Callum Smith Blows
Posted: 16 Sep 2017, 17:37
How the F was this guy a -3500 favorite in this fight?
I've been pretty impressed by Skoglund. His feints are quite good, but lacks pop in his punches.diddy wrote:How the F was this guy a -3500 favorite in this fight?
No, Smith has been the better one, obviously. Without any doubts.diddy wrote:That fight was incredibly close. Of course that doesn't matter in England. We will see the same in the next fight.
It was a clear 8-4 type fightdiddy wrote:That fight was incredibly close. Of course that doesn't matter in England. We will see the same in the next fight.
Yes, it was 8-4, plus KD - it is clear......Ossyrules wrote:It was a clear 8-4 type fightdiddy wrote:That fight was incredibly close. Of course that doesn't matter in England. We will see the same in the next fight.
But you stick with your anti England theme, you winner
ValMar wrote:Yes, it was 8-4, plus KD - it is clear......Ossyrules wrote:It was a clear 8-4 type fightdiddy wrote:That fight was incredibly close. Of course that doesn't matter in England. We will see the same in the next fight.
But you stick with your anti England theme, you winner
I can not see Smith as a winner against Eubank.
Before this fight I had smith as clear favourite for that fight, now I'm less confident.ValMar wrote:Yes, it was 8-4, plus KD - it is clear......Ossyrules wrote:It was a clear 8-4 type fightdiddy wrote:That fight was incredibly close. Of course that doesn't matter in England. We will see the same in the next fight.
But you stick with your anti England theme, you winner
I can not see Smith as a winner against Eubank.
I am 99/01 Eubank, he is much more creative, and I do not think that Smith is a great puncher (solid one - yes).Ossyrules wrote:Before this fight I had smith as clear favourite for that fight, now I'm less confident.ValMar wrote:Yes, it was 8-4, plus KD - it is clear......Ossyrules wrote:
It was a clear 8-4 type fight
But you stick with your anti England theme, you winner
I can not see Smith as a winner against Eubank.
Both a very aggressive on the inside.
Smiths better on the outside
Eubanks fitter. Smith had to shake the lactic out his arms a couple times.
I'm 60/40 smith. My problem with smith is he starts really well, but as a fight goes on he seems to lack ideas sometimes and can get a bit predictable and robotic in a way. He holds big physical size advantage vs eubank though
99/1 is ridiculous valmar be seriousValMar wrote:I am 99/01 Eubank, he is much more creative, and I do not think that Smith is a great puncher (solid one - yes).Ossyrules wrote:Before this fight I had smith as clear favourite for that fight, now I'm less confident.ValMar wrote:
Yes, it was 8-4, plus KD - it is clear......
I can not see Smith as a winner against Eubank.
Both a very aggressive on the inside.
Smiths better on the outside
Eubanks fitter. Smith had to shake the lactic out his arms a couple times.
I'm 60/40 smith. My problem with smith is he starts really well, but as a fight goes on he seems to lack ideas sometimes and can get a bit predictable and robotic in a way. He holds big physical size advantage vs eubank though
OK, I have been exaggerated, 99/1 was too much. I expected Smith to defeat this Swedish guy (I've never watched him before) by KO/TKO.Ossyrules wrote:99/1 is ridiculous valmar be seriousValMar wrote:I am 99/01 Eubank, he is much more creative, and I do not think that Smith is a great puncher (solid one - yes).Ossyrules wrote:
Before this fight I had smith as clear favourite for that fight, now I'm less confident.
Both a very aggressive on the inside.
Smiths better on the outside
Eubanks fitter. Smith had to shake the lactic out his arms a couple times.
I'm 60/40 smith. My problem with smith is he starts really well, but as a fight goes on he seems to lack ideas sometimes and can get a bit predictable and robotic in a way. He holds big physical size advantage vs eubank though
Smith doesn't punch like golovkin or kovalev, but he does punch hard enough, and carries his power from 1-12. He punches much bigger than eubank for sure
Eubank has fought a career or nobodies including a miles past it abraham and also billy joe Saunders. He got out pointed vs Saunders. Be serious with 99/1
Groves beats eubank imoValMar wrote:OK, I have been exaggerated, 99/1 was too much. I expected Smith to defeat this Swedish guy (I've never watched him before) by KO/TKO.Ossyrules wrote:99/1 is ridiculous valmar be seriousValMar wrote: I am 99/01 Eubank, he is much more creative, and I do not think that Smith is a great puncher (solid one - yes).
Smith doesn't punch like golovkin or kovalev, but he does punch hard enough, and carries his power from 1-12. He punches much bigger than eubank for sure
Eubank has fought a career or nobodies including a miles past it abraham and also billy joe Saunders. He got out pointed vs Saunders. Be serious with 99/1
For me, Smith is no more than B+ SMW (something like Groves), and Eubank might be A- (he toyed with Abraham). Anyway, Eubank will be the favourite if this match happen, he . It is my personal opinion, of course. Smith-Groves would be 50/50 type of fight.
Ossyrules, believe me, I am not Eubank's fan, but I have to admit that his skillset is on the top level. Yes Abraham has passed his prime, but he is/was a truly warior, I have watched more than 20 his fights.Ossyrules wrote:Groves beats eubank imoValMar wrote:OK, I have been exaggerated, 99/1 was too much. I expected Smith to defeat this Swedish guy (I've never watched him before) by KO/TKO.Ossyrules wrote:
99/1 is ridiculous valmar be serious
Smith doesn't punch like golovkin or kovalev, but he does punch hard enough, and carries his power from 1-12. He punches much bigger than eubank for sure
Eubank has fought a career or nobodies including a miles past it abraham and also billy joe Saunders. He got out pointed vs Saunders. Be serious with 99/1
For me, Smith is no more than B+ SMW (something like Groves), and Eubank might be A- (he toyed with Abraham). Anyway, Eubank will be the favourite if this match happen, he . It is my personal opinion, of course. Smith-Groves would be 50/50 type of fight.
Eubank toyed with abraham, who was literally 6/7 years past his best. That's the problem with eubank fans, they say this that and the other but when it comes to it, he's fighting domestic standard boxers. He's great at looking good against domestic standard but he's supposed to be world level. Fight some good opponents and see if you're toying with anyone then
Sorry valmar but abraham was way past his best it was not a contest.ValMar wrote:Ossyrules, believe me, I am not Eubank's fan, but I have to admit that his skillset is on the top level. Yes Abraham has passed his prime, but he is/was a truly warior, I have watched more than 20 his fights.Ossyrules wrote:Groves beats eubank imoValMar wrote: OK, I have been exaggerated, 99/1 was too much. I expected Smith to defeat this Swedish guy (I've never watched him before) by KO/TKO.
For me, Smith is no more than B+ SMW (something like Groves), and Eubank might be A- (he toyed with Abraham). Anyway, Eubank will be the favourite if this match happen, he . It is my personal opinion, of course. Smith-Groves would be 50/50 type of fight.
Eubank toyed with abraham, who was literally 6/7 years past his best. That's the problem with eubank fans, they say this that and the other but when it comes to it, he's fighting domestic standard boxers. He's great at looking good against domestic standard but he's supposed to be world level. Fight some good opponents and see if you're toying with anyone then
I disliked his behaviour, when he ducked GGG, I do not know who was guilty, he or his father (likely both), but CEJ has something special, he bought me with his creativity. Anyway, we will see soon if he is really a "special one"..........I am not sure, of course, but I suppose he might be....Ossyrules wrote:Sorry valmar but abraham was way past his best it was not a contest.ValMar wrote:Ossyrules, believe me, I am not Eubank's fan, but I have to admit that his skillset is on the top level. Yes Abraham has passed his prime, but he is/was a truly warior, I have watched more than 20 his fights.Ossyrules wrote:
Groves beats eubank imo
Eubank toyed with abraham, who was literally 6/7 years past his best. That's the problem with eubank fans, they say this that and the other but when it comes to it, he's fighting domestic standard boxers. He's great at looking good against domestic standard but he's supposed to be world level. Fight some good opponents and see if you're toying with anyone then
Well only know if eubank is top level when he fights a top level guy, whose not ready for retirement like abraham