Page 1 of 2

BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 02:51
by apollo creed
https://twitter.com/bjsaunders_/status/ ... 9166575616

First thing to say is : b.s, that won't happen! :OhYes:

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 02:59
by Best Coast
apollo creed wrote:https://twitter.com/bjsaunders_/status/ ... 9166575616

First thing to say is : b.s, that won't happen! :OhYes:
:lol: Saunders is a clown who is nowhere near GGG's level.

The most damage he could possibly do to Golovkin is to have his little bastard son punch GGG in the nuts. If that happens, hopefully GGG will knock the little bastard across the stage, like Monroe should have done. :OhYes:

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 03:34
by apollo creed
Best Coast wrote:
apollo creed wrote:https://twitter.com/bjsaunders_/status/ ... 9166575616

First thing to say is : b.s, that won't happen! :OhYes:
:lol: Saunders is a clown who is nowhere near GGG's level.

The most damage he could possibly do to Golovkin is to have his little bastard son punch GGG in the nuts. If that happens, hopefully GGG will knock the little bastard across the stage, like Monroe should have done. :OhYes:
:OhYes: :lol:

Saunders is all barking. He's just a troll! He'd price himself out like he usually does.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 03:36
by Jip
Boring saunders. Nibody wants to watch him. Ggg agai st canelo 2, jacobs 2 or charlo. I have 0 interest in bjs

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 04:26
by apollo creed
Jip wrote:Boring saunders. Nibody wants to watch him. Ggg agai st canelo 2, jacobs 2 or charlo. I have 0 interest in bjs
Saunders is so annoying with his wbo strap. He's just a beltholder.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 09:44
by jezzamundo
I'd really like to see GGG-Saunders in December, so the Canelo rematch is for the unified title, though I agree Jacobs or Charlo would be more interesting fights.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 10:04
by Tanzio
3G has already stated that he wants "a fight." In otherwords he does not like to fight slick boxers. Saunders is nothing but slick. It would be another frustrating night for 3G, although he would eventually catch up with and stop Saunders.

Also, if it was across the pond and it went the distance it could end up like the other night or worse on the cards.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 10:10
by boxing_rocks
... and then he asks for $4 mil making his "I am ready" claim just pure talk.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 10:30
by apollo creed
boxing_rocks wrote:... and then he asks for $4 mil making his "I am ready" claim just pure talk.
:lol: BJS has no pen.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 10:37
by dagilechia
I want GGG-Saunders only because I think that BJS shouldn't hold that belt. I he's not a WBO belt holder then 0 interest in this fight.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 10:38
by Nightmare Roy
I'd love to see GGG chin him, easy warm up before the rematch

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 10:53
by Horse
Golovkin is beatable.

Saunders might be able to do it.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 11:48
by ValMar
Horse wrote:Golovkin is beatable.

Saunders might be able to do it.
Simply bet on Saunders' win, betting odds would be acceptable for you, surely.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 12:35
by boxing_rocks
Horse wrote:Golovkin is beatable.

Saunders might be able to do it.
Ha-ha-ha. I doubt Saunders can even beat Khurt.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 17:41
by Enlightened-One
apollo creed wrote:
Best Coast wrote:
apollo creed wrote:https://twitter.com/bjsaunders_/status/ ... 9166575616

First thing to say is : b.s, that won't happen! :OhYes:
:lol: Saunders is a clown who is nowhere near GGG's level.

The most damage he could possibly do to Golovkin is to have his little bastard son punch GGG in the nuts. If that happens, hopefully GGG will knock the little bastard across the stage, like Monroe should have done. :OhYes:
:OhYes: :lol:

Saunders is all barking. He's just a troll! He'd price himself out like he usually does.
Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!

You clearly don't follow the sport of boxing, do you?

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 17:52
by boxing_rocks
Enlightened-One wrote:
apollo creed wrote:
Best Coast wrote: :lol: Saunders is a clown who is nowhere near GGG's level.

The most damage he could possibly do to Golovkin is to have his little bastard son punch GGG in the nuts. If that happens, hopefully GGG will knock the little bastard across the stage, like Monroe should have done. :OhYes:
:OhYes: :lol:

Saunders is all barking. He's just a troll! He'd price himself out like he usually does.
Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!

You clearly don't follow the sport of boxing, do you?
Loefler just said that Saunders asks for crasy money. When it was agreed, the fight was supposed to happen in Astana and money was supposed to come from Kazakh government. Now Saunders needs to be more realistic.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 17:55
by Enlightened-One
boxing_rocks wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
apollo creed wrote: :OhYes: :lol:

Saunders is all barking. He's just a troll! He'd price himself out like he usually does.
Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!

You clearly don't follow the sport of boxing, do you?
Loefler just said that Saunders asks for crasy money. When it was agreed, the fight was supposed to happen in Astana and money was supposed to come from Kazakh government. Now Saunders needs to be more realistic.
I'll say it again, because it's a fact that you cannot possibly refute...

Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 17:55
by northern
Best Coast wrote:
apollo creed wrote:https://twitter.com/bjsaunders_/status/ ... 9166575616

First thing to say is : b.s, that won't happen! :OhYes:
:lol: Saunders is a clown who is nowhere near GGG's level.

The most damage he could possibly do to Golovkin is to have his little bastard son punch GGG in the nuts. If that happens, hopefully GGG will knock the little bastard across the stage, like Monroe should have done. :OhYes:
Genuinely the funniest post I've seen for a long time, mainly because it's true about Billy Joe's little spawn being a little Tw*t and what he deserved :OhYes:

Otherwise couldn't agree more, power advantage has to be Golovkin and he just went 12 rounds with arguably one of, if not the best boxer in the middleweight division. Billy Joe would likely be a good warm up before the re-match with Alvarez and let the Kazakhstan born champion finish his collection of belts to unify the division.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 17:58
by SaadOffTheDeck
Looks like an immediate rematch, now onto Bjs Vs khan.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 18:49
by boxing_rocks
Enlightened-One wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote: Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!

You clearly don't follow the sport of boxing, do you?

Loefler just said that Saunders asks for crasy money. When it was agreed, the fight was supposed to happen in Astana and money was supposed to come from Kazakh government. Now Saunders needs to be more realistic.
I'll say it again, because it's a fact that you cannot possibly refute...

Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!
... And I say that you are worthless mother*cker.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 19 Sep 2017, 20:16
by Cyclops
apollo creed wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:... and then he asks for $4 mil making his "I am ready" claim just pure talk.
:lol: BJS has no pen.
I heard he does have one but he can't read or write so he just gets it out and looks at it occasionally. It's more of an ornament, really.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 20 Sep 2017, 01:53
by Enlightened-One
boxing_rocks wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:

Loefler just said that Saunders asks for crasy money. When it was agreed, the fight was supposed to happen in Astana and money was supposed to come from Kazakh government. Now Saunders needs to be more realistic.
I'll say it again, because it's a fact that you cannot possibly refute...

Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!
... And I say that you are worthless mother*cker.
The truth hurts, eh?

You know for certain that my claim is factually correct and was even corroborated by both sides of the negotiating table.

It would only take seconds for someone possessing moderate intellect to verify the objective truth of reality that I have uttered.

In stark contrast, your excuses are purely your own, since K2 haven't even attempted to contact Queensberry Promotions about a potential GGG-Saunders fight since the Canelo bout.

What are you going to do, kid? Become all teary-eyed and emotional because I dared to have the sheer audacity to reiterate a painful truth that you are intellectually incapable of undermining? Are you going to create another thread poll demanding that I receive a permanent ban?

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 20 Sep 2017, 02:38
by DA GOOSE
jezzamundo wrote:I'd really like to see GGG-Saunders in December, so the Canelo rematch is for the unified title, though I agree Jacobs or Charlo would be more interesting fights.
Me too so all the belts WBA,WBC,WBO,IBO,RING will be on the line for the rematch. Would add to the events interest (for casuals and keen boxing fans alike).

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 20 Sep 2017, 02:57
by Best Coast
Saunders has NO business fighting GGG. He needs to concentrate his efforts on a fellow 2nd-tier fighter like Amir Khan :lol:

http://www.BS.com/saunders-tar ... ht--120579
With Canelo and Golovkin possibly heading to a rematch, Saunders made an unexpected challenge by calling out former champion Amir Khan. The Bolton boxer has been inactive since last May, when he was brutally knocked out by Canelo in six rounds. In that bout, Khan moved up to a catch-weight of 155-pounds to challenge Canelo for the WBC middleweight belt.

“There’s some big names out there. Khan’s boxed before at 160, I’d love the Amir Khan fight, what a fight that would be,” Saunders said.

Re: BJS to GGG : 'Are you ready? Because I am. All the belts!'

Posted: 20 Sep 2017, 10:13
by boxing_rocks
Enlightened-One wrote:
boxing_rocks wrote:
Enlightened-One wrote: I'll say it again, because it's a fact that you cannot possibly refute...

Saunders had already agreed terms to face GGG, but it was Golovkin that lost his pen!
... And I say that you are worthless mother*cker.
The truth hurts, eh?

You know for certain that my claim is factually correct and was even corroborated by both sides of the negotiating table.

It would only take seconds for someone possessing moderate intellect to verify the objective truth of reality that I have uttered.

In stark contrast, your excuses are purely your own, since K2 haven't even attempted to contact Queensberry Promotions about a potential GGG-Saunders fight since the Canelo bout.

What are you going to do, kid? Become all teary-eyed and emotional because I dared to have the sheer audacity to reiterate a painful truth that you are intellectually incapable of undermining? Are you going to create another thread poll demanding that I receive a permanent ban?
No, communicating with a psychically sick person is what hurts.