BoxRec

1. (1.) James DeGale
2. (2.) Carl Frampton
3. (3.) Anthony Joshua
4. (4.) George Groves
5. (5.) Lee Selby
6. (13.) Billy Joe Saunders
7. (6.) Tyson Fury
8. (7.) Tony Bellew
9. (8.) Jamie McDonnell
10. (18.) Luke Campbell

11. (9.) Kell Brook
12. (10.) Terry Flanagan
13. (11.) Scott Quigg
14. (12.) Amir Khan
15. (14.) Khalid Yafai
16. (15.) Chris Eubank Jr.
17. (21.) Callum Smith
18. (16.) Anthony Crolla
19. (17.) Sam Eggington
20. (19.) Martin Murray

21. (20.) Ryan Burnett
22. (22.) Josh Warrington
23. (23.) Ricky Burns
24. (RE.) Paul Butler
25. (NE.) Rocky Fielding
26. (NE.) Hughie Fury
27. (24.) Bradley Skeete
28. (25.) Josh Taylor
29. (26.) Andrew Selby
30. (27.) Lee Haskins

Out - (28.) Nathan Cleverly
Out - (29.) Andy Lee (Irish)
Out - (30.) Dillian Whyte

Any comments/criticisms of the British Top 30 P4P list are very welcome.

Luke Campbell ahead of Flanagan!! As OG Frank would say do me a favour. Apart from a respectable loss to Linares he hasn't done anything as a pro, he lost to the only other time he stepped up a level.

I think we've found Martin Murrays successor

Luke put in a very good performance against a truly world class fighter, which is more than a lot of fighters between 10 and 20 can say, but ultimately he lost the fight so I think jumping up by 8 places is a bit too much.

digzee wrote:Luke Campbell ahead of Flanagan!! As OG Frank would say do me a favour. Apart from a respectable loss to Linares he hasn't done anything as a pro, he lost to the only other time he stepped up a level.

I think we've found Martin Murrays successor

And what's Flanagan done?

Horse wrote:

digzee wrote:Luke Campbell ahead of Flanagan!! As OG Frank would say do me a favour. Apart from a respectable loss to Linares he hasn't done anything as a pro, he lost to the only other time he stepped up a level.

I think we've found Martin Murrays successor

And what's Flanagan done?

more than Tyson Fury and thats a fact.

Josh Taylor,Ryan Burnett,callum smith very low for me ,no Jamie Conlan
or paddy barnes?

Luke Campbell above Brook?

A pretty good list. Fury should be out though until he gets a licence. Campbell too high. Brook too low.

brilo33 wrote:Josh Taylor,Ryan Burnett,callum smith very low for me ,no Jamie Conlan
or paddy barnes?

why the hell would barnes be there? looks like poo and i thought he drew his 3rd fight.

conlan doesnt deserve a spot either.

jamamb wrote:

brilo33 wrote:Josh Taylor,Ryan Burnett,callum smith very low for me ,no Jamie Conlan
or paddy barnes?

why the hell would barnes be there? looks like poo and i thought he drew his 3rd fight.

conlan doesnt deserve a spot either.

a bit of ribbing for him to be honest ,but paddy has a WBO European Flyweight Title, conlan has a world title shot coming up, it is looking a little stale

pretty sad that even hardcore boxing fans think abc trinkets should get ppl spots in these lists. that title means very little. barnes has looked crap and beaten no one. who are conlans best three wins. and hes almost lost a few.

Yeah between 10 and 15 of the 30 on that list will be gone in the next 2-3 years. We need the next generation to start stepping up.

Hahahahahahahahahahahaha What a crock of s h i t

Eggington being ranked above Josh Taylor is beyond parody.

ewenhay wrote:A pretty good list. Fury should be out though until he gets a licence. Campbell too high. Brook too low.

Brook lost his last 2 fights

Ruthless-RKO wrote:

ewenhay wrote:A pretty good list. Fury should be out though until he gets a licence. Campbell too high. Brook too low.

Brook lost his last 2 fights

Yes but against Golovkin and Spence.

ewenhay wrote:

Ruthless-RKO wrote:

ewenhay wrote:A pretty good list. Fury should be out though until he gets a licence. Campbell too high. Brook too low.

Brook lost his last 2 fights

Yes but against Golovkin and Spence.

He's gradually lowering on Horse's list.. had he won those, Horse would probably have him top 3..

Before GGG, Brook wouldn't have deserved top 10 anyway..

mimmy123 wrote:

Horse wrote:

digzee wrote:Luke Campbell ahead of Flanagan!! As OG Frank would say do me a favour. Apart from a respectable loss to Linares he hasn't done anything as a pro, he lost to the only other time he stepped up a level.

I think we've found Martin Murrays successor

And what's Flanagan done?

more than Tyson Fury and thats a fact.

He's never beaten a Klitschko.

mimmy123 wrote:

Horse wrote:

digzee wrote:Luke Campbell ahead of Flanagan!! As OG Frank would say do me a favour. Apart from a respectable loss to Linares he hasn't done anything as a pro, he lost to the only other time he stepped up a level.

I think we've found Martin Murrays successor

And what's Flanagan done?

more than Tyson Fury and thats a fact.

Shall we explain the meaning of the word 'fact' for you?

Ruthless-RKO wrote:

ewenhay wrote:

Ruthless-RKO wrote:
Brook lost his last 2 fights

Yes but against Golovkin and Spence.

He's gradually lowering on Horse's list.. had he won those, Horse would probably have him top 3..

Before GGG, Brook wouldn't have deserved top 10 anyway..

Complete bollocks. Brook before and after golovkin is top 10 p4p. This is only UK there’s no shit loads of elite to kick him out

Ossyrules wrote:

Ruthless-RKO wrote:

ewenhay wrote:
Yes but against Golovkin and Spence.

He's gradually lowering on Horse's list.. had he won those, Horse would probably have him top 3..

Before GGG, Brook wouldn't have deserved top 10 anyway..

Complete bollocks. Brook before and after golovkin is top 10 p4p.

Ossyrules wrote:

Ruthless-RKO wrote:

ewenhay wrote:
Yes but against Golovkin and Spence.

He's gradually lowering on Horse's list.. had he won those, Horse would probably have him top 3..

Before GGG, Brook wouldn't have deserved top 10 anyway..

Complete bollocks. Brook before and after golovkin is top 10 p4p. This is only UK there’s no poo loads of elite to kick him out

Based on what? Prior to Spence Khan had fought better welterweights.. and Brook has been welter all his career

BitPlayer wrote:

mimmy123 wrote:

Horse wrote:And what's Flanagan done?

more than Tyson Fury and thats a fact.

He's never beaten a Klitschko.

Did I say that? Lets not jump to conclusions. It is a fact that Flanagan has done more than Tyson Fury. Flanagan has infact fought in 2017 the last time Fury fought was 2015.

So lets look at the facts.

Since 2015 Flanagan has fought 7 times. Tyson Fury has fought once in 2015.

Looking at that FACT its a fact that Terry Flanagan has done more than Tyson Fury.

No need to apologize but fact are indeed facts.

Put about 50 or 60 more pounds on this, and that's where #7 P4P is now



All the fighters ranked 8 thru 30 on Horse's list should be insulted.