Page 1 of 2
Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 16:38
by littlepug
No not the Beatles although I would probably pick Lennon, anyway you have to fight either Duran, Leonard, Hagler or Hearns at their best, who do you pick ? For me Tommys out, not going near that dude, also want no part of Leonard, don't fancy Duran either so that leaves Hagler for me !
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 16:53
by SaadOffTheDeck
Definitely Leonard, they'd all kick my ass so I'll just pick the one I hated.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 17:29
by Kalan
Tommy Hearns --- Because he was the chinniest... The skinniest... The dumbest... and the physically weakest of the 4.
And from a technical standpoint -- he was the worst boxer of the 4 with the most holes in his defense that could be exploited.
Marvin was slavering as soon as Tommy signed the contract... "I can't wait to get at this MFer."
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 17:30
by Controversial
I’d knock them out one by one, whatever order
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 17:33
by gilgamesh
Can it be Duran circa the late 1990's or 2000 because if so I'd take him
I'd be getting knocked out regardless, but maybe I would've been able to make it into the 2nd round at least against the older Duran.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 17:36
by Kalan
Controversial wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 17:30
I’d knock them out one by one, whatever order
They're all going... Straight up or flung over the saddle.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 17:44
by paddy chavez
Hearns ...all 4 would destroy me but Tommy would do it quickest ,ray would make me look stupid Duran and Hagler a slower beating but the hitman would take me out in one
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 19:41
by lazboy
I want a fast, precise demise. I don’t want a prolonged beating to my organs. Take me out in rd 1 tommy.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 21:07
by ElJefe
Think I'd go for Hearns as well. Just get it over with. If I was a pro boxer in that time I'd probably say Leonard for the fattest cheque.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 19 Nov 2017, 23:12
by davie
Assuming of course I was a world class boxer but not quite on the level of these 4 greats (I assume this is the premise of the thread... don't shoot me GO)
Duran at 135 would be the last one I'd pick.
Hagler would hurt you and be infuriatingly tough, walking through your shots to do so
Hearns would hurt you at his optimal weight. He could box your lugs off, attempting to close the range would be infuriating
Leonard would give you a lesson but would be least likely to knock you clean out.
It would probably last longer with Ray, which might not be a good thing but it looks better on my resume and I am more likely to get a nice pay day to retire with
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 20 Nov 2017, 02:32
by Sidney Carton
Controversial wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 17:30
I’d knock them out one by one, whatever order
Good answer.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 20 Nov 2017, 07:58
by elmersalsa
Sidney Carton wrote: ↑20 Nov 2017, 02:32
Controversial wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 17:30
I’d knock them out one by one, whatever order
Good answer.
Are you Sugar Ray Robinson or Sam Langford?
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 20 Nov 2017, 10:03
by Bard of Boxrec
lazboy wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 19:41
I want a fast, precise demise. I don’t want a prolonged beating to my organs. Take me out in rd 1 tommy.
How would you be capable of staying in there for a 'prolonged beating' with any of them? Are you a pro?
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 20 Nov 2017, 17:21
by lazboy
Riddick Blowe wrote: ↑20 Nov 2017, 10:03
lazboy wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 19:41
I want a fast, precise demise. I don’t want a prolonged beating to my organs. Take me out in rd 1 tommy.
How would you be capable of staying in there for a 'prolonged beating' with any of them? Are you a pro?
Looking for an argument mate. On a innocent thread. On a pretty innocent answer. Had a hard day? Or just looked in the mirror?
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 20 Nov 2017, 17:23
by ewenhay
golden oldie wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 20:27
Kalan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 17:29
Tommy Hearns --- Because he was the chinniest... The skinniest... The dumbest... and the physically weakest of the 4.
And from a technical standpoint -- he was the worst boxer of the 4 with the most holes in his defense that could be exploited.
Marvin was slavering as soon as Tommy signed the contract... "I can't wait to get at this MFer."
STOP TALKING FUKKKING SHITE.
Leonard EVENTUALLY got to him because he gassed due to weight making. Hagler, and Barkley got to him because their chins could take his bombs. Yours couldn't in a MONTH of Sundays, not now, not then, not EVER. You are totally full of the brown stuff, IDIOT.
SCUM like you make my skin crawl, and I don't give a shite whether they ban me from this site or not. You talk about Hearns as though he was an idiot. You have never MET, or KNOWN anyone as good as Tommy Hearns in your POXY worthless life, and that INCLUDES your scabby family. NO ONE ever outboxed Tommy Hearns, he got out gunned on 3 occasions, and lost to a close S.D. on another, but to read your pathetic nonsensical garbage about him being weak defensively, easy to hit, and all the other spew is about as funny as cancer. Grow up, or fukkk off, you pathetic OLD maggot.
You've reached a new low. Well done
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 21 Nov 2017, 15:02
by Kalan
ewenhay wrote: ↑20 Nov 2017, 17:23
golden oldie wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 20:27
Kalan wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 17:29
Tommy Hearns --- Because he was the chinniest... The skinniest... The dumbest... and the physically weakest of the 4.
And from a technical standpoint -- he was the worst boxer of the 4 with the most holes in his defense that could be exploited.
Marvin was slavering as soon as Tommy signed the contract... "I can't wait to get at this MFer."
STOP TALKING FUKKKING SHITE.
Leonard EVENTUALLY got to him because he gassed due to weight making. Hagler, and Barkley got to him because their chins could take his bombs. Yours couldn't in a MONTH of Sundays, not now, not then, not EVER. You are totally full of the brown stuff, IDIOT.
SCUM like you make my skin crawl, and I don't give a shite whether they ban me from this site or not. You talk about Hearns as though he was an idiot. You have never MET, or KNOWN anyone as good as Tommy Hearns in your POXY worthless life, and that INCLUDES your scabby family. NO ONE ever outboxed Tommy Hearns, he got out gunned on 3 occasions, and lost to a close S.D. on another, but to read your pathetic nonsensical garbage about him being weak defensively, easy to hit, and all the other spew is about as funny as cancer. Grow up, or fukkk off, you pathetic OLD maggot.
You've reached a new low. Well done
Old an Moldie... Why don't you pop about 50 sleeping pills and call it a life??? ... You'd make the world a joyous place.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 21 Nov 2017, 15:05
by BitPlayer
Does it matter?
Prabaly one and I'll be out.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 21 Nov 2017, 18:02
by ewenhay
golden oldie wrote: ↑21 Nov 2017, 17:24
ewenhay wrote: ↑20 Nov 2017, 17:23
golden oldie wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 20:27
STOP TALKING FUKKKING SHITE.
Leonard EVENTUALLY got to him because he gassed due to weight making. Hagler, and Barkley got to him because their chins could take his bombs. Yours couldn't in a MONTH of Sundays, not now, not then, not EVER. You are totally full of the brown stuff, IDIOT.
SCUM like you make my skin crawl, and I don't give a shite whether they ban me from this site or not. You talk about Hearns as though he was an idiot. You have never MET, or KNOWN anyone as good as Tommy Hearns in your POXY worthless life, and that INCLUDES your scabby family. NO ONE ever outboxed Tommy Hearns, he got out gunned on 3 occasions, and lost to a close S.D. on another, but to read your pathetic nonsensical garbage about him being weak defensively, easy to hit, and all the other spew is about as funny as cancer. Grow up, or fukkk off, you pathetic OLD maggot.
You've reached a new low. Well done
But still high enough to get vertigo looking down on the likes of you.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 22 Nov 2017, 01:18
by Kalan
golden oldie wrote: ↑21 Nov 2017, 17:32
Kalan wrote: ↑21 Nov 2017, 15:02
ewenhay wrote: ↑20 Nov 2017, 17:23
You've reached a new low. Well done
Old an Moldie... Why don't you pop about 50 sleeping pills and call it a life??? ... You'd make the world a joyous place.
Why don't you just get cancer, and stop posting your anti Ali, Robinson, Armstrong, Hearns, Duran, etc, etc, etc drivel.
You are the sort of imbecilic cretin that would convince yourself you were right as you were tearing the wings from butterflies, whereas anyone normal would watch them fluttering around, maybe take a picture and derive pleasure from observing them.
You are a sick creep.
You're the butterfly boy. No one would think of those mentally deranged acts except a rotted out sewer dwelling pervert like you Old-n-Moldie.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 22 Nov 2017, 03:51
by NateJR
Hearns, only because he'd hit me so hard once I'd be out like a light and not feel a thing. I'm not saying the others couldn't do the same, but Id rather get my lights put out rather than battered around for awhile..
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 22 Nov 2017, 10:01
by elmersalsa
Thinking about it, I wouldn't fight none of the four greats. Either way you're life is in complete danger.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 22 Nov 2017, 10:18
by tiny_acres
I'll fight whoever gives me the biggest payday.
I'd take a dive before he lands the first punch.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 23 Nov 2017, 17:57
by elmersalsa
tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Nov 2017, 10:18
I'll fight whoever gives me the biggest payday.
I'd take a dive before he lands the first punch.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 23 Nov 2017, 18:34
by cfang
elmersalsa wrote: ↑23 Nov 2017, 17:57
tiny_acres wrote: ↑22 Nov 2017, 10:18
I'll fight whoever gives me the biggest payday.
I'd take a dive before he lands the first punch.
Defo hearns. One punch - boom - hopefully id wake up.
Re: Who would you fight between the fab four
Posted: 23 Nov 2017, 19:11
by davie
Just when you think "this is a nice boxing related thread, posing an interesting, thought provoking question, it couldn't possibly end with people telling each other to kill themselves or that they hoped they'd die of cancer"...... BAM!
