BoxRec

Latest rankings uploaded;

www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

Always good for a laugh.

Cheers!

Mexi-Box wrote: ↑31 Dec 2017, 17:39 Always good for a laugh.

..I actually consider the "quality opposition" column very informative and helpful..

Lennox wrote: ↑31 Dec 2017, 11:01 Latest rankings uploaded;

www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

What does L* mean?

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Jan 2018, 07:21

Lennox wrote: ↑31 Dec 2017, 11:01 Latest rankings uploaded;

www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

What does L* mean?

L* is when the fighter officially lost but there was sufficient subjective evidence that the result was grossly unfair and therefore the points allocation were altered.

Lennox wrote: ↑03 Jan 2018, 14:06

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Jan 2018, 07:21

Lennox wrote: ↑31 Dec 2017, 11:01 Latest rankings uploaded;

www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

What does L* mean?

L* is when the fighter officially lost but there was sufficient subjective evidence that the result was grossly unfair and therefore the points allocation were altered.

Hmm, that's a hairy business to be in....

Lennox wrote: ↑03 Jan 2018, 14:06

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑03 Jan 2018, 07:21

Lennox wrote: ↑31 Dec 2017, 11:01 Latest rankings uploaded;

www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

What does L* mean?

L* is when the fighter officially lost but there was sufficient subjective evidence that the result was grossly unfair and therefore the points allocation were altered.

I take it ~ is the opposite. I seen it place near a number (win) for example Hassan N'Dam ..

Really dig this ranking system. Good job.

Not a bad list...

Pulev bit too low.

Hammer, Teper and Duhaupas too high.

Not too far of anyways

Heretic wrote: ↑03 Jan 2018, 16:19 Not a bad list...

Pulev bit too low.

Hammer, Teper and Duhaupas too high.

Not too far of anyways

It's all based on who they fight..

Before I take a peek can one tell me if this list has Tyson Fury in it?

If not I take it as a decent reliable list thats worth peeking.

nope

So is this the place we should all look for credible rankings? Just curious, as all seem to have an agenda of some sort.

I notice they have Manny Pacquiao ranked 3rd at welterweight, for example.

is there an agenda in computerized rankings. how is that built into the system for particular biases?

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑05 Jan 2018, 16:10

Heretic wrote: ↑03 Jan 2018, 16:19 Not a bad list...

Pulev bit too low.

Hammer, Teper and Duhaupas too high.

Not too far of anyways

It's all based on who they fight..

Ok then. I can see Duhaupas being there. Helenius and Charr are pretty good names. But who has Teper fought? Only Duhaupas there for him.... And I actually scored that fight for Duhaupas at the time.

Lennox wrote: ↑31 Dec 2017, 11:01 Latest rankings uploaded;

www.premierboxingorganisation.com/heavyweight-200

Quick question..

WASAKIL WANGEK THA 31 WBC W L W W W W W W 16 63 W W W W W W W 1 W 2

I'm sure Wangek didn't fight in between his two Chocolatito fights did he? This would suggest he did.

JESSE MAGDALENO is not showing an L after the Dogboe loss