Page 1 of 2

If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 11:16
by apollo creed
At 135 Garcia had some solid fights like Linares, Easter Jr and probably Lomachenko ! :box:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
by Enlightened-One
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:16If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

At 135 Garcia had some solid fights like Linares, Easter Jr and probably Lomachenko ! :box:
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 13:43
by apollo creed
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:16If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

At 135 Garcia had some solid fights like Linares, Easter Jr and probably Lomachenko ! :box:
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:
Nope! I can understand the fight with Broner because it made $en$e but why Mikey didn't stay at 135 and try to unify with Linares or Easter Jr who has the IBF title at 135 lbs ? :OhYes:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 14:00
by IKSRTFO
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:16If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

At 135 Garcia had some solid fights like Linares, Easter Jr and probably Lomachenko ! :box:
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:
:lol:
He's the same height (maybe taller) as Tim Bradley, Pernell Whitaker, Macho Camacho, Lucas Matthysse, Manny Pacquiao, Ruslan Provodnikov, Ricky Hatton

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 14:59
by Enlightened-One
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 13:43
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:16If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

At 135 Garcia had some solid fights like Linares, Easter Jr and probably Lomachenko ! :box:
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:
Nope! I can understand the fight with Broner because it made $en$e but why Mikey didn't stay at 135 and try to unify with Linares or Easter Jr who has the IBF title at 135 lbs ? :OhYes:
There's a lot you don't understand that I cannot be bothered to explain to you. If Mikey Garcia's own words, coupled with the actions of the WBC aren't good enough for you then you really do need to seek help from a professionally-trained mental healthcare specialist.

I've provided you with a factually correct definitive answer to the question you posed, so I don't need to do anything else.

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 15:06
by Enlightened-One
IKSRTFO wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:00
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:16If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

At 135 Garcia had some solid fights like Linares, Easter Jr and probably Lomachenko ! :box:
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:
:lol:
He's the same height (maybe taller) as Tim Bradley, Pernell Whitaker, Macho Camacho, Lucas Matthysse, Manny Pacquiao, Ruslan Provodnikov, Ricky Hatton
Mikey Garcia has clearly explained his desire to move back down to 135lbs after his next bout and he's already detailed his reasons for doing so.

If you feel compelled to be a smart ârsê about it, then I suggest you send him a strongly-worded letter telling him that he doesn't know shît about his own body!

End of thread! :TU:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 16:44
by IKSRTFO
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 15:06
IKSRTFO wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:00
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:
:lol:
He's the same height (maybe taller) as Tim Bradley, Pernell Whitaker, Macho Camacho, Lucas Matthysse, Manny Pacquiao, Ruslan Provodnikov, Ricky Hatton
Mikey Garcia has clearly explained his desire to move back down to 135lbs after his next bout and he's already detailed his reasons for doing so.

If you feel compelled to be a smart ârsê about it, then I suggest you send him a strongly-worded letter telling him that he doesn't know shît about his own body!

End of thread! :TU:
He moving down to 135 still doesn't mean that being 5'6" isn't "physically not big enough to permanently campaign." Juan Diaz fought at 135 and 140 at 5'6"

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 17:24
by HyacinthusTurnipseed
Where has this reputation of Mikey Garcia being s chicken suddenly come from?

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 17:25
by apollo creed
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:59
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 13:43
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:
Nope! I can understand the fight with Broner because it made $en$e but why Mikey didn't stay at 135 and try to unify with Linares or Easter Jr who has the IBF title at 135 lbs ? :OhYes:
There's a lot you don't understand that I cannot be bothered to explain to you. If Mikey Garcia's own words, coupled with the actions of the WBC aren't good enough for you then you really do need to seek help from a professionally-trained mental healthcare specialist.

I've provided you with a factually correct definitive answer to the question you posed, so I don't need to do anything else.

I think Mikey knows very well that coming back to 135 lbs would put a lot of pressure on him regarding to a possible fight with Lomachenko. Mikey doesn't want that $hit to happen. :OhYes: So he moved up and took P4P Lipinets instead of trying to unify with Linares or Easter Jr. :OhYes: :wave:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 17:29
by apollo creed
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 15:06
IKSRTFO wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:00
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 11:21
Mikey Garcia’s move to 140lbs is supposedly only a temporary one. There’s a video of him on YouTube stating his desire to return to 135lbs immediately after his next bout.

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.

In fact, the WBC granted special permission to Mikey Garcia to face Sergey Lipinets for the IBF’s 140lbs title under the assumption that he’ll be facing Jorge Linares at 135lbs during his next outing.

End of thread! :TU:
:lol:
He's the same height (maybe taller) as Tim Bradley, Pernell Whitaker, Macho Camacho, Lucas Matthysse, Manny Pacquiao, Ruslan Provodnikov, Ricky Hatton
Mikey Garcia has clearly explained his desire to move back down to 135lbs after his next bout and he's already detailed his reasons for doing so.

If you feel compelled to be a smart ârsê about it, then I suggest you send him a strongly-worded letter telling him that he doesn't know shît about his own body!

End of thread! :TU:
Mikey almost got sandwiched between Lomachenko and Crawford, period! Lucky for him that Crawford is gonna compete at 147! :OhYes:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 17:34
by apollo creed
Look what Easter Jr has to say about it:

“That’s just a lame excuse to not fight,” Easter said. “I don’t produce enough fans. What does Lipinets – no disrespect to him – but what … come on now. Everybody knows that is not true. I have fans all over. My fan base is big. Like I said, man, it don’t matter if we fought in a room with nobody. It shouldn’t even matter. If the money’s good and the contract’s good, then we should fight. I wouldn’t care about fighting in front of nobody, because I know what I’m gonna do.”

“If I was that much an easy fight, the fight would’ve been made off the offer they gave Mikey,” Easters said. “It would’ve been made. It just didn’t make sense, all these excuses. I don’t make no excuses. I’m coming to fight and they know that.”


FACT and FACTS!

:OhYes:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 19:39
by Enlightened-One
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 17:29Mikey almost got sandwiched between Lomachenko and Crawford, period! Lucky for him that Crawford is gonna compete at 147! :OhYes:
OK, so it seems you’ve finally come clean about your initially thinly-veiled agenda.

Instead of creating a thread discussing Mikey Garcia’s one-off world title bout at 140lbs, you really wanted to start-up a bandwagon of hatred about the man, by encouraging others to endorse your unsubstantiated belief about him being a “duck”.

You clearly don't know anything about Mikey Garcia's troubled relationship with Top Rank, which promotes Lomachenko and Crawford!

FFS! Why didn’t you just be honest about your opinions and create an anti-Mikey Garcia thread? :shame:

You’re a fúckíng juvenile twát! :lol:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 20:36
by tiny_acres
HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 17:24 Where has this reputation of Mikey Garcia being s chicken suddenly come from?
Because here at Boxrec if a fighter doesn't fight who and when certain posters want.
They are considered a coward a chicken and a disgrace to humanity.
Half of the members are delusional

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 05 Jan 2018, 22:49
by Mexi-Box
tiny_acres wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 20:36
HyacinthusTurnipseed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 17:24 Where has this reputation of Mikey Garcia being s chicken suddenly come from?
Because here at Boxrec if a fighter doesn't fight who and when certain posters want.
They are considered a coward a chicken and a disgrace to humanity.
Half of the members are delusional
Agreed. The guy dominated Dejan coming off a long layoff and a single tuneup, and he moved up to fight Broner. BoxRec is full of idiots.

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 00:32
by Evander
As time goes on this Crawford hype needs to be addressed.
Some are making him out to be worthy of a high placement at 147 and P4P.
Spence has been spoken of as a potential opponent but would the fight be entertaining ?
What fight would vault Crawford as a legit Welterweight and give him some cred in the P4P Top 10 ?

Keith Thurman

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 05:03
by apollo creed
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 19:39
apollo creed wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 17:29Mikey almost got sandwiched between Lomachenko and Crawford, period! Lucky for him that Crawford is gonna compete at 147! :OhYes:
OK, so it seems you’ve finally come clean about your initially thinly-veiled agenda.

Instead of creating a thread discussing Mikey Garcia’s one-off world title bout at 140lbs, you really wanted to start-up a bandwagon of hatred about the man, by encouraging others to endorse your unsubstantiated belief about him being a “duck”.

You clearly don't know anything about Mikey Garcia's troubled relationship with Top Rank, which promotes Lomachenko and Crawford!

FFS! Why didn’t you just be honest about your opinions and create an anti-Mikey Garcia thread? :shame:

You’re a fúckíng juvenile twát! :lol:
:shame: :shame:
You are wrong again! Linares and especially Easter Jr (135 IBF champion) were there to be challenged by Mikey! :OhYes: :box: :box:

Easter Jr: "That’s just a lame excuse to not fight,” Easter said. “I don’t produce enough fans. What does Lipinets – no disrespect to him – but what … come on now."

Mikey just moved up to a safer division.

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 05:19
by jamamb
loma huggers wanna make it seem like mikeys a ducker

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 05:53
by apollo creed
Also Easter Jr feels he is avoided by Mikey. :OhYes:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 08:29
by Counter-puncher
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:59

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.


I've provided you with a factually correct definitive answer to the question you posed, so I don't need to do anything else.
saying that a fighter's being 5'6 means he is therefore not physically big enough to campaign at 140lbs is absolutely not a 'factually correct definitive answer', you have been helpfully provided with a list of fighters of 5'6, many of them with smaller frames than Garcia, who campaigned with great success at 140lbs.

NOTE TO READERS: DID YOU EVER NOTICE HOW OFTEN EO USES THREE WORDS WHEN ONE WILL DO? 'FACTUAL', OR 'CORRECT', OR 'DEFINITIVE', WOULD DO, BUT HE CAN'T HELP HIMSELF SAYING ALL THREE? THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF A PERSON TRYING TO APPEAR MORE INTELLIGENT THROUGH HIS USE OF LANGUAGE, AND OVERCOMPENSATING. NOTE, IN MOST OF HIS POSTS, THERE WILL BE SIMILAR SUPERFLUOUS USES OF LANGUAGE, WHERE HE WILL SAY BASICALLY THE SAME THING WITH TWO OR THREE DIFFERENT WORDS. PLEASE DON'T CONFUSE HIS VERBOSITY AND POMPOUS TONE FOR INTELLIGENCE- HE REALLY ISN'T A VERY BRIGHT GUY.

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 08:54
by Enlightened-One
Counter-puncher wrote: 06 Jan 2018, 08:29
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:59

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.


I've provided you with a factually correct definitive answer to the question you posed, so I don't need to do anything else.
saying that a fighter's being 5'6 means he is therefore not physically big enough to campaign at 140lbs is absolutely not a 'factually correct definitive answer', you have been helpfully provided with a list of fighters of 5'6, many of them with smaller frames than Garcia, who campaigned with great success at 140lbs.

NOTE TO READERS: DID YOU EVER NOTICE HOW OFTEN EO USES THREE WORDS WHEN ONE WILL DO? 'FACTUAL', OR 'CORRECT', OR 'DEFINITIVE', WOULD DO, BUT HE CAN'T HELP HIMSELF SAYING ALL THREE? THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF A PERSON TRYING TO APPEAR MORE INTELLIGENT THROUGH HIS USE OF LANGUAGE, AND OVERCOMPENSATING. NOTE, IN MOST OF HIS POSTS, THERE WILL BE SIMILAR SUPERFLUOUS USES OF LANGUAGE, WHERE HE WILL SAY BASICALLY THE SAME THING WITH TWO OR THREE DIFFERENT WORDS. PLEASE DON'T CONFUSE HIS VERBOSITY AND POMPOUS TONE FOR INTELLIGENCE- HE REALLY ISN'T A VERY BRIGHT GUY.
Please read through the previous response I supplied to the person that challenged my remark you quoted.

In regards to your irrational rambling spiel that you've articulated using bold uppercase text, I am always capable of justifying my beliefs by citing evidence either from the proverbial "horses mouth" or from reliable sources.

That doesn't require remarkable intellect, instead it demonstrates an ability to effectively quantify one's claims, which requires a certain amount of effort that you regularly fail to demonstrate, hence the reason why I'm always able to argue far more effectively than you can.

Simply put: I reap the rewards of possessing knowledge that was acquired from the amount of effort I expend performing extensive research! Whereas you don't even try, so you always fail.

Keep crying kid, because your tears taste delicious! :TU:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 09:24
by apollo creed
Counter-puncher wrote: 06 Jan 2018, 08:29
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:59

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.


I've provided you with a factually correct definitive answer to the question you posed, so I don't need to do anything else.
saying that a fighter's being 5'6 means he is therefore not physically big enough to campaign at 140lbs is absolutely not a 'factually correct definitive answer', you have been helpfully provided with a list of fighters of 5'6, many of them with smaller frames than Garcia, who campaigned with great success at 140lbs.

NOTE TO READERS: DID YOU EVER NOTICE HOW OFTEN EO USES THREE WORDS WHEN ONE WILL DO? 'FACTUAL', OR 'CORRECT', OR 'DEFINITIVE', WOULD DO, BUT HE CAN'T HELP HIMSELF SAYING ALL THREE? THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF A PERSON TRYING TO APPEAR MORE INTELLIGENT THROUGH HIS USE OF LANGUAGE, AND OVERCOMPENSATING. NOTE, IN MOST OF HIS POSTS, THERE WILL BE SIMILAR SUPERFLUOUS USES OF LANGUAGE, WHERE HE WILL SAY BASICALLY THE SAME THING WITH TWO OR THREE DIFFERENT WORDS. PLEASE DON'T CONFUSE HIS VERBOSITY AND POMPOUS TONE FOR INTELLIGENCE- HE REALLY ISN'T A VERY BRIGHT GUY.
EO is trying to convince others that what he says it's the only irrefutable truth by repeating these words. EO is like a broken record. :OhYes: :lol:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 09:26
by apollo creed
Enlightened-One wrote: 06 Jan 2018, 08:54
Counter-puncher wrote: 06 Jan 2018, 08:29
Enlightened-One wrote: 05 Jan 2018, 14:59

Mikey is only 5’ 6” and he’s physically not big enough to permanently campaign at 140lbs.


I've provided you with a factually correct definitive answer to the question you posed, so I don't need to do anything else.
saying that a fighter's being 5'6 means he is therefore not physically big enough to campaign at 140lbs is absolutely not a 'factually correct definitive answer', you have been helpfully provided with a list of fighters of 5'6, many of them with smaller frames than Garcia, who campaigned with great success at 140lbs.

NOTE TO READERS: DID YOU EVER NOTICE HOW OFTEN EO USES THREE WORDS WHEN ONE WILL DO? 'FACTUAL', OR 'CORRECT', OR 'DEFINITIVE', WOULD DO, BUT HE CAN'T HELP HIMSELF SAYING ALL THREE? THIS IS A CLASSIC SIGN OF A PERSON TRYING TO APPEAR MORE INTELLIGENT THROUGH HIS USE OF LANGUAGE, AND OVERCOMPENSATING. NOTE, IN MOST OF HIS POSTS, THERE WILL BE SIMILAR SUPERFLUOUS USES OF LANGUAGE, WHERE HE WILL SAY BASICALLY THE SAME THING WITH TWO OR THREE DIFFERENT WORDS. PLEASE DON'T CONFUSE HIS VERBOSITY AND POMPOUS TONE FOR INTELLIGENCE- HE REALLY ISN'T A VERY BRIGHT GUY.
Please read through the previous response I supplied to the person that challenged my remark you quoted.

In regards to your irrational rambling spiel that you've articulated using bold uppercase text, I am always capable of justifying my beliefs by citing evidence either from the proverbial "horses mouth" or from reliable sources.

That doesn't require remarkable intellect, instead it demonstrates an ability to effectively quantify one's claims, which requires a certain amount of effort that you regularly fail to demonstrate, hence the reason why I'm always able to argue far more effectively than you can.

Simply put: I reap the rewards of possessing knowledge that was acquired from the amount of effort I expend performing extensive research! Whereas you don't even try, so you always fail.

Keep crying kid, because your tears taste delicious! :TU:
Mikey has moved up to a safer division. FACT! :OhYes: :OhYes:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 09:33
by Counter-puncher
'I reap the rewards of possessing knowledge' :lol:

Way to go EO, you really disproved my point about your pompous superfluous use of language there

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 11:39
by apollo creed
Counter-puncher wrote: 06 Jan 2018, 09:33 'I reap the rewards of possessing knowledge' :lol:

Way to go EO, you really disproved my point about your pompous superfluous use of language there
:lol: Don't know why but I have the feeling EO is Chris Eubank Sr. spreding his wisdom on this forum. Both seems to have the same habits when they communicate with other people and both think they are always right. :lol:

Re: If Crawford would've stood at 140 would Mikey Garcia still moved up at this weight ?

Posted: 06 Jan 2018, 11:54
by Enlightened-One
apollo creed wrote: 06 Jan 2018, 11:39
Counter-puncher wrote: 06 Jan 2018, 09:33 'I reap the rewards of possessing knowledge' :lol:

Way to go EO, you really disproved my point about your pompous superfluous use of language there
:lol: Don't know why but I have the feeling EO is Chris Eubank Sr. spreding his wisdom on this forum. Both seems to have the same habits when they communicate with other people and both think they are always right. :lol:
You're just bitter because you don't follow the sport as closely as I do, which means you know a lot less about it.

If you try harder and follow the sport better, you'll eventually learn to make fewer bizarre unsubstantiated claims that bear absolutely no relation to reality. :TU:

I think it's cute seeing juveniles like you having little temper tantrums. :lol: