Page 1 of 2

Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 07 Mar 2018, 10:56
by DrDuke
Prime vs Prime,

Holmes of his early championship time against Bowe of the early 90s, up to the 1st Holyfield-fight and subsequent successful title defences.

Who would you pick and why?

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 03:55
by Kalan
Holmes wins easy.... Larry would stuff Bowe's slow, power jab like he did Bonecrusher Smith -- and slip Bowe's swings like he did Ray Mercer... He would counter the crap out of him.... You have to be a better technician than Bowe to beat Holmes.

He would do what Herbie HIde did for 3 rounds - except he wouldn't allow a frustrated Bowe to maul him...

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 06:10
by DrDuke
Holmes was a more proficient boxer. Furthermore, he could brawl also, he was able to answer inside, if someone like Bowe managed to get closer. Anyway Larry's jab would have ruined Bowe's attempts to achieve success. I pick Holmes to outbox him.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 13:38
by Flump
Holmes by decision, using the Tony Tubbs blueprint, but with much more authority.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 16:37
by Ambling Alp II
Bowe had a better win/loss record, KO% and he weighed more. Doesn't that automatically mean that he would win?

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 17:33
by Nile4000
Larry wins a 9-3, 8-4 type of decision, using his jab and his boxing ability to keep Riddick at bay, mixing it up with him just enough to earn his respect.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 17:50
by Kalan
Ambling Alp II wrote: 08 Mar 2018, 16:37 Bowe had a better win/loss record, KO% and he weighed more. Doesn't that automatically mean that he would win?
Only in your closed off 1-trick pony world.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 17:52
by BoxBuzz
I may be "odd man out" here because I'm going to just cover a nuance that is at least worthy of consideration.

Larry Holmes was a much better champion....and my gut says he wins this. AND

I've always felt Bowe was rather amazing at his peak which lasted for the blink of an eye....and which is always fodder for most everyone as to why he does not rank with the greats. I think Saad may have shared this opinion with me. A rare case where he and I saw eye to eye. So as odd as it sounds..you take the best Larry, and face him against that "window of opportunity" where Bowe did show remarkable ability....and you have yourself a real fight. In my opinion.

Much of my take here is that psyche's win fights as often as conditioning skill and talent. And Ali and Holmes are the strongest psyche's the sport has ever produced....which is why I favor Larry. But much of the physical data could point in Bowe's direction. I'm on the record as believing he beats Lewis prime for prime.....but Lewis could probably just do a slow ring walk, and enough time would have passed to where he's back in favor....even in my estimation. That's how ridiculously short Riddicks prime was.

But as Alp jokingly refers to the "stats" with a sense of humor, and Kalan seems to take them seriously when he needs to and ignore them on rainy days, they do tell a bit of a story. Beating Holyfield should give one pause.

So...In my goofy world.....Foreman hits harder than Ike based on what my "lying eyes" tell me...............I simply believe it to be true......Larry beats Bowe in most cases....but IF this happens at Bowes pinnacle.....I would not place a bet. But that pinnacle has such a short warranty.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 18:26
by Kalan
BoxBuzz wrote: 08 Mar 2018, 17:52 Ali and Holmes are the strongest psyche's the sport has ever produced ...... I'm on the record as believing [Bowe] beats Lewis prime for prime.... But as Alp jokingly refers to the "stats" with a sense of humor, and Kalan seems to take them seriously.... So...In my goofy world.....Foreman hits harder than Ike based on what my "lying eyes" tell me
Frazier, Spinks, and Norton psyched Ali out -- simply by not buying into his "greatness" and treating him as cannon fodder.

Tyson psyched Holmes out -- by exerting his youth, strength, and punching power (considerable advantages for Mikey) and smashing right into Larry until he was outta there.

It would be hard to imagine the dim witted and hittable Bowe getting the better of the resourceful Lewis.... Only you could do that by ignoring the extremely variant results of their match-ups with guys like punching bag Golota... Who was as dumb as Bowe, but not as easy to punch up side the head.

I guess you never heard of sarcasm... Everyone knows that Alp is constantly championing little tykes to beat bigger stronger men - and putting out stats that ignore Liston-Patterson... Tyson-Spinks... Foreman-Frazier... Lewis-Tyson... Ibeabuchi-Byrd and most fights where size and strength played a critical role... They don't meet his magic formula for weight advantage.

There's not many fights from "prime" Ike to choose from... He had 19 when he fought Byrd... However it was a little different than Tua's fight with Byrd -- and Foreman's fight with Jimmy Young... Foreman landed shots... They didn't do the job.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 08 Mar 2018, 18:44
by oogiebe
Holmes would completely outclass Bowe. Although I have to say, Bowe had a year or so of being quite good, Holmes had all the tools save the lights out punch. The two main talents of Holmes would no doubt get into Bowe's feeble head:

1 - Arguably the greatest jab I've ever seen in the division
2 - Amazing recuperative powers (ask Shavers)

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 09 Mar 2018, 17:25
by BoxBuzz
Dear Kalan....time for the truth patrol again.....you are keeping me workin' today.

Foreman and Peralta......Foreman and Ali......Foreman and Young.


Not one of those losses, (or in Peralta's case a win for George) can possibly speak to Foreman's hitting power. What irks me to pieces, is that I think you know this....and are pulling our chain here. But on the odd possibility that you believe this.....let me offer a counter thought for your perusal. These losses speak to certain fighters ability to be elusive when the Nukes close in. All fast, all evasive, all master craftsman. Two defeated Foreman and the other made him look a bit clumsy.. And....above average chins each of them. Not a bad formula for a darn good chance against the hardest hitting heavyweight in History. Given a good clear shot....Foreman could put anyone to sleep. Trick for the opponent was to never get caught flush.

Respectfully submitted
your friend
BuzzBox

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 09 Mar 2018, 17:27
by Counter-puncher
oogiebe wrote: 08 Mar 2018, 18:44 Holmes would completely outclass Bowe. Although I have to say, Bowe had a year or so of being quite good, Holmes had all the tools save the lights out punch. The two main talents of Holmes would no doubt get into Bowe's feeble head:

1 - Arguably the greatest jab I've ever seen in the division
2 - Amazing recuperative powers (ask Shavers)
:TU: but it's Larrys footwork and athleticism that give him the biggest edge against Bowe, IMO

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 09 Mar 2018, 17:28
by oogiebe
Counter-puncher wrote: 09 Mar 2018, 17:27
oogiebe wrote: 08 Mar 2018, 18:44 Holmes would completely outclass Bowe. Although I have to say, Bowe had a year or so of being quite good, Holmes had all the tools save the lights out punch. The two main talents of Holmes would no doubt get into Bowe's feeble head:

1 - Arguably the greatest jab I've ever seen in the division
2 - Amazing recuperative powers (ask Shavers)
:TU: but it's Larrys footwork and athleticism that give him the biggest edge against Bowe, IMO
Holmes was the most underrated heavy ever IMO. You are correct in his footwork as well.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 02:22
by Kalan
BoxBuzz wrote: 09 Mar 2018, 17:25 Dear Kalan....time for the truth patrol again.....you are keeping me workin' today.

Foreman and Peralta......Foreman and Ali......Foreman and Young.


Not one of those losses, (or in Peralta's case a win for George) can possibly speak to Foreman's hitting power. What irks me to pieces, is that I think you know this....and are pulling our chain here. But on the odd possibility that you believe this.....let me offer a counter thought for your perusal. These losses speak to certain fighters ability to be elusive when the Nukes close in. All fast, all evasive, all master craftsman. Two defeated Foreman and the other made him look a bit clumsy.. And....above average chins each of them. Not a bad formula for a darn good chance against the hardest hitting heavyweight in History. Given a good clear shot....Foreman could put anyone to sleep. Trick for the opponent was to never get caught flush.

Respectfully submitted
your friend
BuzzBox
Thanks for your flights of fancy Buzzbox... Let's just say that Foreman had clear shots at Ali's, Young's, and 194-pound Peralta's chins... None of them were master boxers. They were floored and humiliated by others who hit them.

You have a very weird notion about what a master boxer is... It's not a guy with no body attack or inside game who gets hit with a flood of left hooks - some of which knock the crap out of him... It's not a guy who gets stopped by slow swingers like Gerry Cooney and Ernie Shavers.... And it's not a guy who gets stopped by feather punching Willie Pastrano.

Master boxers are guys like Vasyl Lomachenko.... Mikey Garcia.... Floyd Mayweather.... Salvador Sanchez.... Terence Crawford.... and other highly skilled pugilists of History who never got knocked down, stopped, or beaten up.... Eder Jofre might qualify... I don't know if he ever got floored by anybody. He had 78 fights and fought to age 40.

Now Gene Tunney DID get knocked down once and probably still qualified as a master because he was suffering vision problems in his last 2 fights and developed a blind spot - which he said prompted his retirement at 31.... His eyes went bad from staring into the sun for long periods of time... He knew it was hurting his eyes but he wanted to increase his will power.... He wrote all about it in his book "Arms for Living" .... I thought he was a really intelligent guy until I read that...

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 07:46
by Controversial
Kalan wrote: 10 Mar 2018, 02:22
Let's just say that Foreman had clear shots at Ali's, Young's, and 194-pound Peralta's chins... None of them were master boxers. They were floored and humiliated by others who hit them.

And it's not a guy who gets stopped by feather punching Willie Pastrano.
Peralta easily beat Pastrano in their first fight. He lost the rematch due to a cut in a world title fight (in Pastrano's hometown), he wasn’t knocked out or down. It was said to be a poor stoppage too.


.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 13:06
by oogiebe
Kalan wrote: 10 Mar 2018, 02:22
BoxBuzz wrote: 09 Mar 2018, 17:25 Dear Kalan....time for the truth patrol again.....you are keeping me workin' today.

Foreman and Peralta......Foreman and Ali......Foreman and Young.


Not one of those losses, (or in Peralta's case a win for George) can possibly speak to Foreman's hitting power. What irks me to pieces, is that I think you know this....and are pulling our chain here. But on the odd possibility that you believe this.....let me offer a counter thought for your perusal. These losses speak to certain fighters ability to be elusive when the Nukes close in. All fast, all evasive, all master craftsman. Two defeated Foreman and the other made him look a bit clumsy.. And....above average chins each of them. Not a bad formula for a darn good chance against the hardest hitting heavyweight in History. Given a good clear shot....Foreman could put anyone to sleep. Trick for the opponent was to never get caught flush.

Respectfully submitted
your friend
BuzzBox
Thanks for your flights of fancy Buzzbox... Let's just say that Foreman had clear shots at Ali's, Young's, and 194-pound Peralta's chins... None of them were master boxers. They were floored and humiliated by others who hit them.

You have a very weird notion about what a master boxer is... It's not a guy with no body attack or inside game who gets hit with a flood of left hooks - some of which knock the crap out of him... It's not a guy who gets stopped by slow swingers like Gerry Cooney and Ernie Shavers.... And it's not a guy who gets stopped by feather punching Willie Pastrano.

Master boxers are guys like Vasyl Lomachenko.... Mikey Garcia.... Floyd Mayweather.... Salvador Sanchez.... Terence Crawford.... and other highly skilled pugilists of History who never got knocked down, stopped, or beaten up.... Eder Jofre might qualify... I don't know if he ever got floored by anybody. He had 78 fights and fought to age 40.

Now Gene Tunney DID get knocked down once and probably still qualified as a master because he was suffering vision problems in his last 2 fights and developed a blind spot - which he said prompted his retirement at 31.... His eyes went bad from staring into the sun for long periods of time... He knew it was hurting his eyes but he wanted to increase his will power.... He wrote all about it in his book "Arms for Living" .... I thought he was a really intelligent guy until I read that...
Wally Pip was a master boxer...couldn't break a fart but was truly amazing to watch. Ask Sandy Saddler.

Also, Harry Greb gave Tunney fits. Beat him once...a middleweight. I think I get what your points are about...to be fair, you are truly a fan of the science.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 23:09
by BoxBuzz
Controversial wrote: 10 Mar 2018, 07:46
Kalan wrote: 10 Mar 2018, 02:22
Let's just say that Foreman had clear shots at Ali's, Young's, and 194-pound Peralta's chins... None of them were master boxers. They were floored and humiliated by others who hit them.

And it's not a guy who gets stopped by feather punching Willie Pastrano.
Peralta easily beat Pastrano in their first fight. He lost the rematch due to a cut in a world title fight (in Pastrano's hometown), he wasn’t knocked out or down. It was said to be a poor stoppage too.


.

This many facts in one short contribution raise the blood pressure for some. Just sayin'.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 10 Mar 2018, 23:14
by BoxBuzz
Kalan......why do you always pretend not to know precisely what I'm aiming at?

Ok....I'm not going to disagree that I used the words "master craftsmen" in the case of Young, Ali and Peralta.
And for the record.....I was generally referring to their ability to provide a good defense for themselves.


You knew that.

And.....we could have another conversation on each of these fighters ability to conduct good offensive maneuvers as well, none of them are as lame in their offense as you are in your willful obfuscation.

And you surely are a benchmark example of a willful obfuscator would you not agree?

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 11 Mar 2018, 13:45
by oogiebe
BoxBuzz wrote: 10 Mar 2018, 23:14 Kalan......why do you always pretend not to know precisely what I'm aiming at?

Ok....I'm not going to disagree that I used the words "master craftsmen" in the case of Young, Ali and Peralta.
And for the record.....I was generally referring to their ability to provide a good defense for themselves.


You knew that.

And.....we could have another conversation on each of these fighters ability to conduct good offensive maneuvers as well, none of them are as lame in their offense as you are in your willful obfuscation.

And you surely are a benchmark example of a willful obfuscator would you not agree?
I'd agree!!!!! lol! ;-)

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 12 Mar 2018, 10:39
by Ambling Alp II
BoxBuzz wrote: 08 Mar 2018, 17:52 I may be "odd man out" here because I'm going to just cover a nuance that is at least worthy of consideration.

Larry Holmes was a much better champion....and my gut says he wins this. AND

I've always felt Bowe was rather amazing at his peak which lasted for the blink of an eye....and which is always fodder for most everyone as to why he does not rank with the greats. I think Saad may have shared this opinion with me. A rare case where he and I saw eye to eye. So as odd as it sounds..you take the best Larry, and face him against that "window of opportunity" where Bowe did show remarkable ability....and you have yourself a real fight. In my opinion.

Much of my take here is that psyche's win fights as often as conditioning skill and talent. And Ali and Holmes are the strongest psyche's the sport has ever produced....which is why I favor Larry. But much of the physical data could point in Bowe's direction. I'm on the record as believing he beats Lewis prime for prime.....but Lewis could probably just do a slow ring walk, and enough time would have passed to where he's back in favor....even in my estimation. That's how ridiculously short Riddicks prime was.

But as Alp jokingly refers to the "stats" with a sense of humor, and Kalan seems to take them seriously when he needs to and ignore them on rainy days, they do tell a bit of a story. Beating Holyfield should give one pause.

So...In my goofy world.....Foreman hits harder than Ike based on what my "lying eyes" tell me...............I simply believe it to be true......Larry beats Bowe in most cases....but IF this happens at Bowes pinnacle.....I would not place a bet. But that pinnacle has such a short warranty.
Yes I was joking about the whole weight advantage, win/loss thing. It is amazing how often people throw those things around as if it means something.
Sometimes the bigger heavyweight won, sometimes he didn't. The win/loss records are usually more to do with the level of competition than how good the fighters were.
What counts is how good someone was and to a lesser extent the styles of the two fighters.
Even though Holmes weighed less when he won the title than little Joe Frazier did when he lost it, it doesn't matter.
Holmes was the better fighter and would probably would have won. However, at this best, Bowe was good enough to give him a lot of trouble.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 13 Mar 2018, 03:02
by Cojimar 1946
There was a time when smaller heavyweights were able to consistently beat larger heavyweights but since the early 1990s the bigger 235+ heavyweights have consistently dominated the division and tend to beat the smaller heavyweights. The top big men have improved to a degree that smaller Holmes-sized heavyweights can rarely compete at the elite level.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 13 Mar 2018, 10:37
by Ambling Alp II
No they have not improved. In the last few years it has been mostly one huge guy vs another. Someone has to win. There simply are very few smaller heavyweights. The fights themselves have little action and usually suck.

Wilder weighed less than 215 for his last fight and beat a guy weighed 240. He has been outweighed in his last 18 fights and won them all.
Holyfield was beating big guys in the 1990s. When he was way, way past it only the judges that thought he didn't beat Valuev.
Roy Jones won a WBS title weighing 193.

It ability that makes the difference. If the bigger guy is better, he will usually win. If the smaller guy is better, he will usually win.
In this case, Holmes is not nearly as heavy but was the better of the two; though when Bowe was at his best the gap was closer than many might think.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 13 Mar 2018, 11:35
by oogiebe
Ambling Alp II wrote: 13 Mar 2018, 10:37 No they have not improved. In the last few years it has been mostly one huge guy vs another. Someone has to win. There simply are very few smaller heavyweights. The fights themselves have little action and usually suck.

Wilder weighed less than 215 for his last fight and beat a guy weighed 240. He has been outweighed in his last 18 fights and won them all.
Holyfield was beating big guys in the 1990s. When he was way, way past it only the judges that thought he didn't beat Valuev.
Roy Jones won a WBS title weighing 193.

It ability that makes the difference. If the bigger guy is better, he will usually win. If the smaller guy is better, he will usually win.
In this case, Holmes is not nearly as heavy but was the better of the two; though when Bowe was at his best the gap was closer than many might think.
Let's not forget this: Today's training and diet are light years above past eras. Imagine George Foreman (a young one) living in today's scientific modern training camps. He would weigh near 240 LBS and be a monster.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 13 Mar 2018, 15:50
by Ambling Alp II
Completely disagree with that modern training is light years better.

Re: Larry Holmes vs Riddick Bowe

Posted: 13 Mar 2018, 15:52
by oogiebe
Ambling Alp II wrote: 13 Mar 2018, 15:50 Completely disagree with that modern training is light years better.
OK!