Why??? When a fighter gets caught on PEDs after...
Posted: 22 Apr 2018, 21:50
I recently watched a really good interview with boxing trainer Adam Booth on the use of PEDs in boxing.
He raised an interesting point using David Price as an example. Price lost to Thompson and Teper who both subsequently (post fight) tested positive for performance enhancing drugs. However, Price record still shows a L against both guys, even though they tested positive.
Booth also claims often a winner would be paid a winners bonus (or winners purse share be higher or whatever) yet that’s never revoked and sent to the loser who’s been cheated. , neither has anyone ever looked at a “potential loss of earnings” for losing against a cheat. For example had Price won the rematch with Thompson he would’ve been in line for a much bigger money fight than he had after losing.
He raised an interesting point using David Price as an example. Price lost to Thompson and Teper who both subsequently (post fight) tested positive for performance enhancing drugs. However, Price record still shows a L against both guys, even though they tested positive.
Booth also claims often a winner would be paid a winners bonus (or winners purse share be higher or whatever) yet that’s never revoked and sent to the loser who’s been cheated. , neither has anyone ever looked at a “potential loss of earnings” for losing against a cheat. For example had Price won the rematch with Thompson he would’ve been in line for a much bigger money fight than he had after losing.