Page 1 of 2

1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 12 May 2018, 13:36
by oogiebe
The 1970's was a classic time for the Middleweight Division. Chock full of great fighters who fought each other throughout the decade. Look up any one of the below and see how much crossover fights they had! Note the dominance of Philly fighters (Philadelphia, PA)

C - Carlos Monzon

Gratian Tonna
Bennis Briscoe - Philly
Bobby "Boogaloo" Watts - Philly
Vito Antuofermo
Billy Douglas - Philly
WIllie Monroe - Philly
Eugene Hart - Philly
Rodrigo Valdes
Tony Licata
Alan Minter
Armundo Muniz
Mustafa Hamsho
Tony Mundine
Nino Benvenuti (at end of his career)
Marvin Hagler
Jean Claude Bouttier
Emile Griffith (great welterweight champ but included here out of respect)
Tom Bogs (went on to LHW)
Vinnie Curto
Denny Moyer
Juan and Antonio Aguilar
Et Al. Who were the others missed by me?

I believe the most exciting decade in the division of all-time.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 12 May 2018, 13:37
by oogiebe
For me the best part of the 1970's was you could open up anyone's record and you'll see all the other guys, many times twice and a bunch more than that? Everyone fought each other...imagine!?

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 12 May 2018, 13:50
by SenorPipino
That was a classic era. It probably gets unfairly downgraded because of Monzon's dominance during the bulk of that decade.

If there was no Monzon, Valdez would be much more remembered and revered.

The Philly fighters were special with Boogaloo Watts (hey, there's a great name) handing Hagler the first defeat of his career (very disputed) and Worm Monroe turning the same trick just months later (deserved).

Hagler would avenge those losses with KO wins.

Too bad Monzon and Hagler missed each other by a few years.

Only error I see on your list is including Mando Muñiz, a career welterweight.

Unlike others, I won't call you every 4 letter word in the book for this mistake or suggest that the world would he better off without your presence.

But believe me, somebody will.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 12 May 2018, 13:52
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:50 That was a classic era. It probably gets unfairly downgraded because of Monzon's dominance during the bulk of that decade.

If there was no Monzon, Valdez would be much more remembered and revered.

The Philly fighters were special with Boogaloo Watts (hey, there's a great name) handing Hagler the first defeat of his career (very disputed) and Worm Monroe turning the same trick just months later (deserved).

Hagler would avenge those losses with KO wins.

Too bad Monzon and Hagler missed each other by a few years.

Only error I see on your list is including Mando Muñiz, a career welterweight.

Unlike others, I won't call you every 4 letter word in the book for this mistake or suggest that the world would he better off without your presence.

But believe me, somebody will.
I didn't look up any on the list. From my head. Not the first time I have Armundo in as middleweight. Don't know why that keeps happening to me! I don't mind being corrected at all.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 12 May 2018, 13:54
by oogiebe
oogiebe wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:52
SenorPipino wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:50 That was a classic era. It probably gets unfairly downgraded because of Monzon's dominance during the bulk of that decade.

If there was no Monzon, Valdez would be much more remembered and revered.

The Philly fighters were special with Boogaloo Watts (hey, there's a great name) handing Hagler the first defeat of his career (very disputed) and Worm Monroe turning the same trick just months later (deserved).

Hagler would avenge those losses with KO wins.

Too bad Monzon and Hagler missed each other by a few years.

Only error I see on your list is including Mando Muñiz, a career welterweight.

Unlike others, I won't call you every 4 letter word in the book for this mistake or suggest that the world would he better off without your presence.

But believe me, somebody will.
I didn't look up any on the list. From my head. Not the first time I have Armundo in as middleweight. Don't know why that keeps happening to me! I don't mind being corrected at all.
BTW! LMAO! I can only imagine the ridiculousness of a certain somebody hyper-focusing an oversight, and thus taking away from the post itself. Thank you!

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 12 May 2018, 14:05
by SenorPipino
Muniz was one of my favorites.

Followed him from the beginning when turned pro at the Olympic Auditorium in 1970.

Fought Carlos Palomino twice for the welterweight title, and is best remembered for being robbed in Mexico against Mantequilla Napoles.

Imagine that--- a Mexican robbed in his native country when fighting a Cuban.

Ended his career on his stool against Ray Leonard, but Mando's time was over.

But if it's any consolation, if Muniz was any bigger, he would have made a fine middleweight.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 12 May 2018, 16:20
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 12 May 2018, 14:05 Muniz was one of my favorites.

Followed him from the beginning when turned pro at the Olympic Auditorium in 1970.

Fought Carlos Palomino twice for the welterweight title, and is best remembered for being robbed in Mexico against Mantequilla Napoles.

Imagine that--- a Mexican robbed in his native country when fighting a Cuban.

Ended his career on his stool against Ray Leonard, but Mando's time was over.

But if it's any consolation, if Muniz was any bigger, he would have made a fine middleweight.
LOL! Ok...I feel much better now!
LMAO!

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 07:17
by bennie
oogiebe wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:36 The 1970's was a classic time for the Middleweight Division. Chock full of great fighters who fought each other throughout the decade. Look up any one of the below and see how much crossover fights they had! Note the dominance of Philly fighters (Philadelphia, PA)

C - Carlos Monzon

Gratian Tonna
Bennis Briscoe - Philly
Bobby "Boogaloo" Watts - Philly
Vito Antuofermo
Billy Douglas - Philly
WIllie Monroe - Philly
Eugene Hart - Philly
Rodrigo Valdes
Tony Licata
Armundo Muniz
Mustafa Hamsho
Tony Mundine
Nino Benvenuti (at end of his career)
Marvin Hagler
Jean Claude Bouttier
Emile Griffith (great welterweight champ but included here out of respect)
Tom Bogs (went on to LHW)
Vinnie Curto
Denny Moyer
Juan and Antonio Aguilar
Et Al. Who were the others missed by me?

I believe the most exciting decade in the division of all-time.

Griffith gave Monzon a really hard fight in their rematch in 1973 so he deserves to be in there. I've seen Hart's fight with Hagler in 1976 and he seemed to be hurting Hagler with body shots before he eventually bailed out.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:16
by Flump
From our side of the pond I'd like to see Kevin Finnegan and Alan Minter on that list

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:25
by oogiebe
Flump wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:16 From our side of the pond I'd like to see Kevin Finnegan and Alan Minter on that list
Alan mintor was on my original list before I accidentally erased my txt and had to start over. Adding him now. N

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:26
by oogiebe
oogiebe wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:36 The 1970's was a classic time for the Middleweight Division. Chock full of great fighters who fought each other throughout the decade. Look up any one of the below and see how much crossover fights they had! Note the dominance of Philly fighters (Philadelphia, PA)

C - Carlos Monzon

Gratian Tonna
Bennis Briscoe - Philly
Bobby "Boogaloo" Watts - Philly
Vito Antuofermo
Billy Douglas - Philly
WIllie Monroe - Philly
Eugene Hart - Philly
Rodrigo Valdes
Tony Licata
Armundo Muniz
Alan Minter
Mustafa Hamsho
Tony Mundine
Nino Benvenuti (at end of his career)
Marvin Hagler
Jean Claude Bouttier
Emile Griffith (great welterweight champ but included here out of respect)
Tom Bogs (went on to LHW)
Vinnie Curto
Denny Moyer
Juan and Antonio Aguilar
Et Al. Who were the others missed by me?

I believe the most exciting decade in the division of all-time.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:29
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:50 That was a classic era. It probably gets unfairly downgraded because of Monzon's dominance during the bulk of that decade.

If there was no Monzon, Valdez would be much more remembered and revered.

The Philly fighters were special with Boogaloo Watts (hey, there's a great name) handing Hagler the first defeat of his career (very disputed) and Worm Monroe turning the same trick just months later (deserved).

Hagler would avenge those losses with KO wins.

Too bad Monzon and Hagler missed each other by a few years.

Only error I see on your list is including Mando Muñiz, a career welterweight.

Unlike others, I won't call you every 4 letter word in the book for this mistake or suggest that the world would he better off without your presence.

But believe me, somebody will.
Great post! I always thought that Monzon would do away with Hagler believe it or not. Too long too strong too good a counter puncher.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:30
by Flump
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:25
Flump wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:16 From our side of the pond I'd like to see Kevin Finnegan and Alan Minter on that list
Alan mintor was on my original list before I accidentally erased my txt and had to start over. Adding him now. N
No love for Finnegan oogiebe? He beat Tonna, Bouttier and Sibson, gave Hagler two good arguments and lost by the width on a cigarette paper to Minter.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:35
by oogiebe
Flump wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:30
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:25
Flump wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:16 From our side of the pond I'd like to see Kevin Finnegan and Alan Minter on that list
Alan mintor was on my original list before I accidentally erased my txt and had to start over. Adding him now. N
No love for Finnegan oogiebe? He beat Tonna, Bouttier and Sibson, gave Hagler two good arguments and lost by the width on a cigarette paper to Minter.
to be honest, he fell through the cracks as I am not as familiar with him. It was to be all the blokes who fought one another, so in that respect it's not a miss. He gets an asterisk for fighting Mintor three times and Haggler twice.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:35
by oogiebe
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:35
Flump wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:30
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:25

Alan mintor was on my original list before I accidentally erased my txt and had to start over. Adding him now. N
No love for Finnegan oogiebe? He beat Tonna, Bouttier and Sibson, gave Hagler two good arguments and lost by the width on a cigarette paper to Minter.
to be honest, he fell through the cracks as I am not as familiar with him. It was to be all the blokes who fought one another, so in that respect it's not a miss. He gets an asterisk for fighting Mintor three times and Haggler twice.
Haggler ko'd him twice.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:46
by SenorPipino
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:29
SenorPipino wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:50 That was a classic era. It probably gets unfairly downgraded because of Monzon's dominance during the bulk of that decade.

If there was no Monzon, Valdez would be much more remembered and revered.

The Philly fighters were special with Boogaloo Watts (hey, there's a great name) handing Hagler the first defeat of his career (very disputed) and Worm Monroe turning the same trick just months later (deserved).

Hagler would avenge those losses with KO wins.

Too bad Monzon and Hagler missed each other by a few years.

Only error I see on your list is including Mando Muñiz, a career welterweight.

Unlike others, I won't call you every 4 letter word in the book for this mistake or suggest that the world would he better off without your presence.

But believe me, somebody will.
Great post! I always thought that Monzon would do away with Hagler believe it or not. Too long too strong too good a counter puncher.

Monzon's long arms and his skill at tying opponents up before they could find the proper range might have given him the nod over Hagler.

He was able to defuse Valdez by wrapping him up before Valdez could cut the distance, especially in the first fight which I thought Monzon won in lopsided fashion.

But I don't think that Monzon would "do away" with Hagler easily.

Marvelous was no weakling and would have been a 15 round handful for any middleweight champion.

Probably a squeaker of a decision.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:47
by Flump
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:35
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:35
Flump wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:30

No love for Finnegan oogiebe? He beat Tonna, Bouttier and Sibson, gave Hagler two good arguments and lost by the width on a cigarette paper to Minter.
to be honest, he fell through the cracks as I am not as familiar with him. It was to be all the blokes who fought one another, so in that respect it's not a miss. He gets an asterisk for fighting Mintor three times and Haggler twice.
Haggler ko'd him twice.
Both cuts stoppages when he was well in the fights, Finnegan used to bleed as badly as Minter.

But it's your list mate, just throwing him out there...

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 13:49
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:46
oogiebe wrote: 13 May 2018, 13:29
SenorPipino wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:50 That was a classic era. It probably gets unfairly downgraded because of Monzon's dominance during the bulk of that decade.

If there was no Monzon, Valdez would be much more remembered and revered.

The Philly fighters were special with Boogaloo Watts (hey, there's a great name) handing Hagler the first defeat of his career (very disputed) and Worm Monroe turning the same trick just months later (deserved).

Hagler would avenge those losses with KO wins.

Too bad Monzon and Hagler missed each other by a few years.

Only error I see on your list is including Mando Muñiz, a career welterweight.

Unlike others, I won't call you every 4 letter word in the book for this mistake or suggest that the world would he better off without your presence.

But believe me, somebody will.
Great post! I always thought that Monzon would do away with Hagler believe it or not. Too long too strong too good a counter puncher.

Monzon's long arms and his skill at tying opponents up before they could find the proper range might have given him the nod over Hagler.

He was able to defuse Valdez by wrapping him up before Valdez could cut the distance, especially in the first fight which I thought Monzon won in lopsided fashion.

But I don't think that Monzon would "do away" with Hagler easily.

Marvelous was no weakling and would have been a 15 round handful for any middleweight champion.

Probably a squeaker of a decision.
As a Monzon fan, Valdes scared the crap out of me. It was towards Monzon's twilight though and I don't think 3 years earlier it wouldn't have been a rout.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 14:15
by SenorPipino
Valdez had developed into an outstanding champion and I expected him to give Monzon all he could handle in the first fight.

But Monzon drew Valdez in, countered spectacularly, and tied him up when necessary.

I didn't feel the fight was close. Maybe 10-5 or 11-4 Monzon. The judges saw it quite a bit closer though.

A year later, with Monzon approaching 35, it was apparent that he was slipping. It took him about 5 or 6 rounds to get untracked and was even decked early.

This was a fight where Monzon's physical strength and boxing wisdom carried him to a close win.

Valdez was in the fight throughout, but appeared to wear down from Monzon's pressure.

Monzon wisely decided to retire shortly after that fight. Hagler was on the rise in 1977 and it's unlikely that a post-35 year old Monzon would have had enough in the tank to upend him.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 13 May 2018, 14:17
by oogiebe
SenorPipino wrote: 13 May 2018, 14:15 Valdez had developed into an outstanding champion and I expected him to give Monzon all he could handle in the first fight.

But Monzon drew Valdez in, countered spectacularly, and tied him up when necessary.

I didn't feel the fight was close. Maybe 10-5 or 11-4 Monzon. The judges saw it quite a bit closer though.

A year later, with Monzon approaching 35, it was apparent that he was slipping. It took him about 5 or 6 rounds to get untracked and was even decked early.

This was a fight where Monzon's physical strength and boxing wisdom carried him to a close win.

Valdez was in the fight throughout, but appeared to wear down from Monzon's pressure.

Monzon wisely decided to retire shortly after that fight. Hagler was on the rise in 1977 and it's unlikely that a post-35 year old Monzon would have had enough in the tank to upend him.
Great post! 100% agreed. :TU: :yay:

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 14 May 2018, 12:09
by Kalan
oogiebe wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:37 For me the best part of the 1970's was you could open up anyone's record and you'll see all the other guys, many times twice and a bunch more than that? Everyone fought each other...imagine!?
They didn’t fight each other that much actually... Who else on your list did Armando Muniz beat? To my knowledge he never fought at Middleweight... Douglas doesn't have a lot of big Middleweight wins either.

Griffith was certainly a better Middleweight than almost anybody you mentioned except Carlos Monzon... Griffith beat Benvenuti, Bogs, Briscoe, and Moyer on your list, along with a lot of 60’s Middleweights like Dick Tiger... Hugo Corro and Ronnie Harris were better 1970’s Middleweights than many on your list. They were pretty fair boxers.

The 90’s had much better Middleweights at the top than the 70's -- with Roy Jones… James Toney… Mike McCallum… Reggie Johnson… Michael Nunn… Bernard Hopkins… Lamar Parks… Julian Jackson… and Gerald McClellan.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 14 May 2018, 14:09
by oogiebe
Kalan wrote: 14 May 2018, 12:09
oogiebe wrote: 12 May 2018, 13:37 For me the best part of the 1970's was you could open up anyone's record and you'll see all the other guys, many times twice and a bunch more than that? Everyone fought each other...imagine!?
They didn’t fight each other that much actually... Who else on your list did Armando Muniz beat? To my knowledge he never fought at Middleweight... Douglas doesn't have a lot of big Middleweight wins either.

Griffith was certainly a better Middleweight than almost anybody you mentioned except Carlos Monzon... Griffith beat Benvenuti, Bogs, Briscoe, and Moyer on your list, along with a lot of 60’s Middleweights like Dick Tiger... Hugo Corro and Ronnie Harris were better 1970’s Middleweights than many on your list. They were pretty fair boxers.

The 90’s had much better Middleweights at the top than the 70's -- with Roy Jones… James Toney… Mike McCallum… Reggie Johnson… Michael Nunn… Bernard Hopkins… Lamar Parks… Julian Jackson… and Gerald McClellan.
I'll let you look it up, Kalan. They most assuredly did. You are entitled to your own opinion, but it doesn't make it better than anyone else's. Most of these guys fought one another more than once. State you disagree and don't carry on an off topic debate on my thread please.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 14 May 2018, 16:06
by Kalan
It's not an opinion when you say you can look up the record on one on your list and see all the others there.... You're stating it like it's a fact... Who was BEST prime Middleweight Marvin Hagler EVER fought who was a natural Middleweight and didn't come up from Lightweight, Welterweight, or Super Welterweight???

I don't see any paragons of Fistic History on his record... Roy Jones fought James Toney and Bernard Hopkins.... James Toney fought Mike McCallum... Michael Nunn... and Reggie Johnson etc.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 14 May 2018, 16:07
by oogiebe
Kalan wrote: 14 May 2018, 16:06 It's not an opinion when you say you can look up the record on one on your list and see all the others there.... You're stating it like it's a fact... Who was BEST prime Middleweight Marvin Hagler EVER fought who was a natural Middleweight and didn't come up from Lightweight, Welterweight, or Super Welterweight???

I don't see any paragons of Fistic History on his record.
If that's how you feel then go somewhere else. You've hijacked another post and I'm f'n done with your antics.

Re: 1970's Great Middleweight Era

Posted: 14 May 2018, 16:09
by Kalan
I see a lot of fights between 90's Middleweight Champions who were ATG Middleweights... Not too much from the 70's.