BoxRec

G.McClellan wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 03:05 Lets assume there was nothing to provoke the situation.

Datsue wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 14:44

G.McClellan wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 03:05 Lets assume there was nothing to provoke the situation.

Provoke the situation... of choking a woman?

The only time such behaviour is acceptable is if someone's asked you to do it for mutually consensual kinky sexy-time reasons, which as this was outside against a fence it's obviously not the case.

Whether he did it or not, I can see someone digging for that angle, maybe even I'd let it go without saying anything. But implying that there is a situation where the alleged offence is justifiable means that you, sir, are a complete & total fuckwit.

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:33

Datsue wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 14:44

G.McClellan wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 03:05 Lets assume there was nothing to provoke the situation.

Provoke the situation... of choking a woman?

The only time such behaviour is acceptable is if someone's asked you to do it for mutually consensual kinky sexy-time reasons, which as this was outside against a fence it's obviously not the case.

Whether he did it or not, I can see someone digging for that angle, maybe even I'd let it go without saying anything. But implying that there is a situation where the alleged offence is justifiable means that you, sir, are a complete & total fuckwit.

She may have attacked him with some sort of weapon.

Then it's self defense. And self defense is justifiable no matter what the gender.

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:53

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:33

Datsue wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 14:44

Provoke the situation... of choking a woman?

The only time such behaviour is acceptable is if someone's asked you to do it for mutually consensual kinky sexy-time reasons, which as this was outside against a fence it's obviously not the case.

Whether he did it or not, I can see someone digging for that angle, maybe even I'd let it go without saying anything. But implying that there is a situation where the alleged offence is justifiable means that you, sir, are a complete & total fuckwit.

She may have attacked him with some sort of weapon.

Then it's self defense. And self defense is justifiable no matter what the gender.

Ah, you think he was the one calling police to arrest the armed female aggressor?

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 16:26

boxing_rocks wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:53

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 15:33

She may have attacked him with some sort of weapon.

Then it's self defense. And self defense is justifiable no matter what the gender.

Ah, you think he was the one calling police to arrest the armed female aggressor?

I don't know who called the police.

Sometimes the perp does it as a way to look like the innocent victim.

Or the woman may have started the whole incident and then called the police for protection once Charlo got the upper hand.

Honestly, i don't know. I never said that Charlo was innocent. He may be guilty as hell.

I'm just defending him until the entire story comes out. And reminding everyone that just because a woman is involved, it doesn't mean she has a free pass to do whatever she wants while the man has to suck it up.

Male or female, you gotta pay your dues.

Sequitorian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:02 Looks to me like he's training for the cage ...

... (the MMA cage, that is ... though MMA and jails attract the same sort of scum) ....

punchoutsb wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:04

Sequitorian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:02 Looks to me like he's training for the cage ...

... (the MMA cage, that is ... though MMA and jails attract the same sort of scum) ....

I've never heard of a boxer doing something like this...

Sequitorian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:05

punchoutsb wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:04

Sequitorian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:02 Looks to me like he's training for the cage ...

... (the MMA cage, that is ... though MMA and jails attract the same sort of scum) ....

I've never heard of a boxer doing something like this...

Right ... it's usually a punch ...

candyslim wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 16:52 Yeaaah Perhaps she was a North Korean spy and Jermell went for her throat to stop her yelling secret information to her contact hiding the other side of the fence that he would have reported back to little rocket man. Jermell could be a national hero but there you go jumping to conclusions and assuming he's the bad guy.

Never thought of that did ya?

Sequitorian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:36 Hell ... cops can't even choke someone ... it's illegal outside the cage ...

... (that's the MMA cage AND jail ... same environment) ... ...

SenorPipino wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 19:30

Sequitorian wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 18:36 Hell ... cops can't even choke someone ... it's illegal outside the cage ...

... (that's the MMA cage AND jail ... same environment) ... ...

From what I understand, cops in many cities (but not all) are prohibited from using a strict chokehold but they can use a very similar stranglehold which applies pressure on the carotid artery.

That's pretty effective, nevertheless.

Imagine a cop fighting for his life in a struggle with some resisting cretin....and being told he has to play nice.

Ludicrous. Whatever works, use it.

chuck9788 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 19:44 Both of the Charlo brothers have difficulty controlling their emotions. Especially Jermell. I've seen Jermall have to calm his brother down in certain instances.

chuck9788 wrote: ↑25 Jul 2018, 19:44 Both of the Charlo brothers have difficulty controlling their emotions. Especially Jermell. I've seen Jermall have to calm his brother down in certain instances.