BoxRec

https://diepresse.com/home/sport/mehrsp ... nnte-Titel

Due to a technicality (Charr's representatives not being allowed to be present at the opening of the B sample) the ruling could become void, allowing Charr to retain his belt.

This type of situation has been upheld in sports before by international courts - e.g. http://www.espn.co.uk/olympics/judo/new ... id=6150132

Miller v Dinu looks like it could be unlikely be for the WBA belt due to Charr appealing and potentially filing civil suit OR Charr could still get stripped and file a suit and be offered a title shot in 4 years time which now has precedent

The saga continues

joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 08:02 Miller v Dinu looks like it could be unlikely be for the WBA belt due to Charr appealing and potentially filing civil suit OR Charr could still get stripped and file a suit and be offered a title shot in 4 years time which now has precedent

Could be a final eliminator? Man Charr hasn't fought in a year.

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 08:09

joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 08:02 Miller v Dinu looks like it could be unlikely be for the WBA belt due to Charr appealing and potentially filing civil suit OR Charr could still get stripped and file a suit and be offered a title shot in 4 years time which now has precedent

Could be a final eliminator? Man Charr hasn't fought in a year.

It might be, i would say that it would be bold to make a decision on it with a potential lawsuit pending bu this is the WBA.

Also, Arum made a point about Jennings being leapfrogged, against the WBA's own rules, for the discussed titlefight between Miller and Dinu so i imagine they would make an appeal for a final eliminator if the rules are similar aswell.

The Championships Chairman may notify the two highest ranked available boxers, or the highest ranked available regional champions, or a combination thereof, of the obligation to meet in an elimination bout to become a mandatory contender, giving them dates by which the negotiations must commence and be concluded.

http://www.wbaboxing.com/wp-content/upl ... -11-15.pdf

Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!

Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24 Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!

Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts

tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:36

Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24 Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!

Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts

LMAO! RIGHT?!

tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:36

Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24 Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!

Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts

Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title

It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about

joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:43

tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:36

Boxing Prospect wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:24 Finally the WBA may have them selves a situation where legal proceedings could stop their multiple title bollocks!

Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts

Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title

It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about

Oquendo does not have to have a eliminator. He's guaranteed a title shot

tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 14:05

joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:43

tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:36

Or the WBA will just then have
Joshua
Charr
Bryan
Miller
Oquendo
Can all have world belts

Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title

It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about

Oquendo does not have to have a eliminator. He's guaranteed a title shot

I was sarcastically pointing out that Jennings might end up filing a similar complaint to the one Oquendo did and mocking the claims people have to the belt/title shot.

joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 15:14

tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 14:05

joshj909 wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 11:43

Jennings v Oquendo for the mandated regular title-shot eliminator
Bryan v Miller/Dinu for the unified Interim Regular title
Charr v Joshua for the WBA unified super regular title

It's all so simple, i don't know what the fuss is about

Oquendo does not have to have a eliminator. He's guaranteed a title shot

I was sarcastically pointing out that Jennings might end up filing a similar complaint to the one Oquendo did and mocking the claims people have to the belt/title shot.

Sorry. I thought you were another nutcase who saw nothing wrong with the multi belt garbage.
So sorry

tiny_acres wrote: ↑06 Nov 2018, 15:21 Sorry. I thought you were another nutcase who saw nothing wrong with the multi belt garbage.
So sorry

No worries, i should've made myself clearer because you do somehow find those nutcases here and there on here.