Page 1 of 1
Why doesn't Froch fight......
Posted: 16 Oct 2004, 12:35
by Jacko11
Eric Teymour?Matthew Barney? even Donovan Smillie....? two of these are very dangerous and the other is too akward me thinks?
Re: Why doesn't Froch fight......
Posted: 16 Oct 2004, 13:09
by bennie
Jacko11 wrote:Eric Teymour?Matthew Barney? even Donovan Smillie....? two of these are very dangerous and the other is too akward me thinks?
Teymour is fighting for the vacant WBU super-middleweight title in November I believe. It's the only break he can get.
I've heard Smillie is fighting Roddy Doran for the English middleweight title next month in Telford.
Posted: 16 Oct 2004, 13:44
by Jacko11
YEh i'd like to fight Smillie after roddy if don gets the title as he asked for the fight in bn apparently
Posted: 17 Oct 2004, 13:27
by steve689
I got a signed autograph card of Donavon Smillie's from fellow Boxrec poster Chado, he looks like a pretty menacing character but the question is....can he fight?
Posted: 18 Oct 2004, 08:46
by THEBUTCH
Yeah, Teymour could give Froch a decent argument. Don't agree about Barney and Smillie. One won't try and win, the other can't win IMO.
How about a Commonwealth defence against Otis Grant. Valuable experience to be gained, win or lose, against a proven top performer.
Posted: 18 Oct 2004, 09:22
by chris s
steve689 wrote:I got a signed autograph card of Donavon Smillie's from fellow Boxrec poster Chado, he looks like a pretty menacing character but the question is....can he fight?
He is a bag of shite
Posted: 20 Oct 2004, 11:03
by steve689
chris s wrote:steve689 wrote:I got a signed autograph card of Donavon Smillie's from fellow Boxrec poster Chado, he looks like a pretty menacing character but the question is....can he fight?
He is a bag of shite
Lol, that's that then
