BoxRec

As hearn said fury never had 1 single entertaining fight. He is a funny dancing bear but he shouldnt box. Just boring.

Wilder is not even a boxer. 0 footwork, 0 head movemant, 0 technique. Guy is player with an athletic body, good height and great punching power and the intelect of mentaly challenged person.

Joshua vs Povetkin II would make sense since alex was winning on points is technicly superior to aj and the first fight wad very entertaining.

Whyte improved, heard Chisora is in his best condition since years, so winner of this fight would also make sense.

Also Ortiz, a good version of Ortiz gives any hw trouble.

Congratulations on being here 24 hours and becoming the most worthless poster on the forum.
Your parents should be proud

tiny_acres wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 19:58 Congratulations on being here 24 hours and becoming the most worthless poster on the forum.
Your parents should be proud

I never thought I'd see worse than Kalan, but at least he had some knowledge, just a warped imagination.

Tell me where you disagree with me. So you find furys fights entertaining and wilder has excellent technique and doesnt rely only on the knock out punch.

Come on. Make me laugh...

tiny_acres wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 19:58 Congratulations on being here 24 hours and becoming the most worthless poster on the forum.
Your parents should be proud

Wuuupa wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 20:00 Tell me where you disagree with me. So you find furys fights entertaining and wilder has excellent technique and doesnt rely only on the knock out punch.

Come on. Make me laugh...

The objective is to hit and not get hit. FURY does a good job of that. Fighters do not need to entertain you. They are there to win and take the least damage possible. FURY fits the criteria.

Wilder is the opposite end of the spectrum. He gets hit and is sloppy but wins through speed and brutal force. If you want to be entertained he fits the bill. Anything can and does happen in a Wilder fight

tiny_acres wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 20:05

Wuuupa wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 20:00 Tell me where you disagree with me. So you find furys fights entertaining and wilder has excellent technique and doesnt rely only on the knock out punch.

Come on. Make me laugh...

The objective is to hit and not get hit. FURY does a good job of that. Fighters do not need to entertain you. They are there to win and take the least damage possible. FURY fits the criteria.

Wilder is the opposite end of the spectrum. He gets hit and is sloppy but wins through speed and brutal force. If you want to be entertained he fits the bill. Anything can and does happen in a Wilder fight

No. Hit and not get hit is not enough, it has to be in a entertaining fashion, otherwise why watch boxing. Why be bored, be entertained.

I want to watch boxing, not street fighting, wilder fights like a street fighter, i dont want to watch street fighting, thats why no wilder. He is no boxer and if you like boxing than you should dislike wilder.

Wuuupa wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 20:14

tiny_acres wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 20:05

Wuuupa wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 20:00 Tell me where you disagree with me. So you find furys fights entertaining and wilder has excellent technique and doesnt rely only on the knock out punch.

Come on. Make me laugh...

The objective is to hit and not get hit. FURY does a good job of that. Fighters do not need to entertain you. They are there to win and take the least damage possible. FURY fits the criteria.

Wilder is the opposite end of the spectrum. He gets hit and is sloppy but wins through speed and brutal force. If you want to be entertained he fits the bill. Anything can and does happen in a Wilder fight

No. Hit and not get hit is not enough, it has to be in a entertaining fashion, otherwise why watch boxing. Why be bored, be entertained.

I want to watch boxing, not street fighting, wilder fights like a street fighter, i dont want to watch street fighting, thats why no wilder. He is no boxer and if you like boxing than you should dislike wilder.

You sir are obviously not a fan.
Proof that you are a troll. Have a nice day

I love boxing. Have a nice day too.

2 of the Top 3 guys in their division who still have multi millions ahead of them in potential ring earnings should retire while still in their prime? That ranks up there as one of the sillier statements ever uttered on this forum, and we've had some doozies as is.

Jesus Christ what a stupid thread

Stuarty wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 21:13 Jesus Christ what a stupid thread

It essentially sounds like a Joshua fan saying "I'm afraid of what'll happen if my favorite guy fights these guys"...but honestly it's probably just a troll trying to f*ck with people.

Because there's really no credible logic behind it.

KiwiRider wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 21:22

Priceless!!!!!

Welcome back Chep! Well "technicly" not welcome back, but here you are anyway

punchoutsb wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 22:34 Welcome back Chep! Well "technicly" not welcome back, but here you are anyway

Was chep also Jip? If so, ffs.

Well, maybe they should, given that they share the division with the all time greatest heavyweight boxer.

I make no bones that I dislike wilder intensely and I agree he has the mental and emotional age of prepubescent boy but my god as much as I dislike him he's annoyingly entertaining...

Fury on the other hand boxed the best I've seen him box v wilder ok admittedly wilder has as much movement as a shopping trolley ... but Fury has a good skill set...

They both are needed and warranted to be in this div

I personally think the HW is now ousing with loads of talent

ajwesty13 wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 23:45 I make no bones that I dislike wilder intensely and I agree he has the mental and emotional age of prepubescent boy but my god as much as I dislike him he's annoyingly entertaining...

Fury on the other hand boxed the best I've seen him box v wilder ok admittedly wilder has as much movement as a shopping trolley ... but Fury has a good skill set...

They both are needed and warranted to be in this div

I personally think the HW is now ousing with loads of talent

Yeah the division as a whole is as good as it's been since the 90's at the moment I think.

gilgamesh wrote: ↑21 Dec 2018, 00:10 Yeah the division as a whole is as good as it's been since the 90's at the moment I think.

Yeah I'm on that level of thinking ...with usyk coming into the mix the HW is alive and kicking..

lazboy wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 22:50

punchoutsb wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 22:34 Welcome back Chep! Well "technicly" not welcome back, but here you are anyway

Was chep also Jip? If so, ffs.

I definitely think so.

Who is chep and jip?

Wuuupa wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 19:51 Joshua vs Povetkin II would make sense since alex was winning on points is technicly superior to aj and the first fight wad very entertaining.

Where did you get that from?
After the 6 completed rounds Joshua was leading 59-55, 58-56, 58-56 on the scorecards.

don't feed the troll, it was obvious he's a troll and/or he lacks boxing knowledge since his very first post

SteveO wrote: ↑21 Dec 2018, 08:29

Wuuupa wrote: ↑20 Dec 2018, 19:51 Joshua vs Povetkin II would make sense since alex was winning on points is technicly superior to aj and the first fight wad very entertaining.

Where did you get that from?
After the 6 completed rounds Joshua was leading 59-55, 58-56, 58-56 on the scorecards.

The scorecards hearn bought make no sense. Pov was boxing beautifully...technicly much superior to aj.