Who will be favoured by the judges, Joshua or MIller ?
Posted: 14 Feb 2019, 16:36
What do you expect ?
Mighty Hearn against American crowd ?
Mighty Hearn against American crowd ?
Wonderful, wonderful life.................SenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
Same here, it amazes me that people constantly call foul play over scoring when all it takes is a few swing rounds to be scored for one side to give a wider or closer scorecard than expectedSenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
I don't think conspiracy theory per se, but the GGG-Canelo judging (especially in the first fight) and Wilder-Fury outcome was very confusing.littlepug wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:59Same here, it amazes me that people constantly call foul play over scoring when all it takes is a few swing rounds to be scored for one side to give a wider or closer scorecard than expectedSenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
I understand what you’re saying but if 2 judges go opposite ways in a few swing rounds it can happen, plus look how many argue on here about who won what, if we can see different things then so can the judgesRob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 17:22I don't think conspiracy theory per se, but the GGG-Canelo judging (especially in the first fight) and Wilder-Fury outcome was very confusing.littlepug wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:59Same here, it amazes me that people constantly call foul play over scoring when all it takes is a few swing rounds to be scored for one side to give a wider or closer scorecard than expectedSenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
I understand that judge scoring is subjective, but it should be to a certain extent objective. It is of course then very confusing how two judges judging the same fight can have almost polar opposite scorecards.
Yeah but that does not account for scorecards with a 10 round swing. What is the point of having judges scorecards if they give you no barometer of the actual fight itself. I appreciate that close fights can go either way, but they're not the fights I'm referring to. We should never have a fight which can be scored 118-110 by one judge, and 110-118 by another.littlepug wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 17:53I understand what you’re saying but if 2 judges go opposite ways in a few swing rounds it can happen, plus look how many argue on here about who won what, if we can see different things then so can the judgesRob3_142 wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 17:22I don't think conspiracy theory per se, but the GGG-Canelo judging (especially in the first fight) and Wilder-Fury outcome was very confusing.littlepug wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:59Same here, it amazes me that people constantly call foul play over scoring when all it takes is a few swing rounds to be scored for one side to give a wider or closer scorecard than expectedSenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
I understand that judge scoring is subjective, but it should be to a certain extent objective. It is of course then very confusing how two judges judging the same fight can have almost polar opposite scorecards.
Msg has been the site of many rancid decisions.Thomastearns wrote: ↑15 Feb 2019, 06:15 Parties with huge financial investment will always seek to influence the outcome where there's money to be made. That's just human nature, and nothing is immune from this, certainly not boxing.
However this is Madison Square Garden, not Vegas with it's ultra sharp odds players, the spiritual home of the obvious 'cartel', all operating under a different set of sporting values.
MSG should be relatively immune from any such shenanigans, they wouldn't go down so easily with a New York crowd and any resultant furore might draw unwanted scrutiny to boxing underbelly.
In any case, its pretty obvious that the heavyweight division is not the ideal place to try to influence a decision. One punch can quickly render all of your risky 'investment' as worthless as a losing sweepstakes ticket.
I would not disregard the chance of some isolated party (the odd high roller perhaps?) wishing to buy some more assurance in case the fight goes to scorecards, but I don't see it being necessary, because I don't see Miller going beyond 6 rounds.
Disagree. For Canelo to get so many bad calls in his favour, there's something afoot.SenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
Boxing scoring is subjective. You can go over nearly ever bout and find a scorecard you disagree with.tigermoth87 wrote: ↑16 Feb 2019, 02:55Disagree. For Canelo to get so many bad calls in his favour, there's something afoot.SenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
One judge scored him vs Mayweather a tie. Get to eff . As if.
Is Canelo an excellent fighter ? Yes, absolutely !SenorPipino wrote: ↑16 Feb 2019, 11:27Boxing scoring is subjective. You can go over nearly ever bout and find a scorecard you disagree with.tigermoth87 wrote: ↑16 Feb 2019, 02:55Disagree. For Canelo to get so many bad calls in his favour, there's something afoot.SenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
One judge scored him vs Mayweather a tie. Get to eff . As if.
It's just magnified when a high profile fighter is involved.
Canelo has earned every win. If you think something unkosher is afoot, then you probably also believe that 10,000 mysterious shooters were in Dealy Plaza too.
The only egregious decision canelo got was ggg 1. The draw card with Floyd was as bad as it gets, I don't think he won a round but the outcome was just. I thought Lara and trout edged him and the GGG rematch was close but none of them were bad decisions. There is obviously home cooking but the bigger problem is the judges aren't watching the same fight and they're not using the best view to watch it. I don't know if you've ever sat ringside but it's a garbage view compared to your TV. If the ref is in your view and a home crowd goes wild what do you do?ValMar wrote: ↑16 Feb 2019, 13:34Is Canelo an excellent fighter ? Yes, absolutely !SenorPipino wrote: ↑16 Feb 2019, 11:27Boxing scoring is subjective. You can go over nearly ever bout and find a scorecard you disagree with.tigermoth87 wrote: ↑16 Feb 2019, 02:55Disagree. For Canelo to get so many bad calls in his favour, there's something afoot.SenorPipino wrote: ↑14 Feb 2019, 16:41 I expect fair judging. I always do.
These "the judges are bought" conspiracy theories aren't my thing.
The judges will favor the fighter who appears to win the round. No more. No less.
One judge scored him vs Mayweather a tie. Get to eff . As if.
It's just magnified when a high profile fighter is involved.
Canelo has earned every win. If you think something unkosher is afoot, then you probably also believe that 10,000 mysterious shooters were in Dealy Plaza too.
Have the judges protected him several times ? Yes, absolutely !