DOKES/RAZOR
Posted: 26 Feb 2019, 17:41
A QUICK REVIEW, GRT KO..................

What's your point?
LOL! Yes that's clear! I just don't see the relevance to the thread!Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:46Isn't the point clear? The fight was on ppv. What's confusing?
The fight in the thread title was on ppv. Hard to find anywhere more relevant than here to mention it. I doubt many knew it was.
I see. I'm sure folks found that fascinating. Thank you. It wasn't a very strong card if I remember correctly.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:51The fight in the thread title was on ppv. Hard to find anywhere more relevant than here to mention it. I doubt many knew it was.
Complete garbage card. I imagine it's as fascinating as your riveting post that you watched it.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:55I see. I'm sure folks found that fascinating. Thank you. It wasn't a very strong card if I remember correctly.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:51The fight in the thread title was on ppv. Hard to find anywhere more relevant than here to mention it. I doubt many knew it was.
HAHA!! It's so obvious when you are annoyed!!! Poor boy. You're getting pretty popular in the forum, aren't you, crusty!?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:56Complete garbage card. I imagine it's as fascinating as your riveting post that you watched it.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:55I see. I'm sure folks found that fascinating. Thank you. It wasn't a very strong card if I remember correctly.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:51The fight in the thread title was on ppv. Hard to find anywhere more relevant than here to mention it. I doubt many knew it was.
I just responded to your quoting. Nothing on here annoys me.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:58HAHA!! It's so obvious when you are annoyed!!! Poor boy. You're getting pretty popular in the forum, aren't you, crusty!?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:56Complete garbage card. I imagine it's as fascinating as your riveting post that you watched it.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:55I see. I'm sure folks found that fascinating. Thank you. It wasn't a very strong card if I remember correctly.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:51The fight in the thread title was on ppv. Hard to find anywhere more relevant than here to mention it. I doubt many knew it was.
Thank God! I was concerned. Just poking the bear, big guy.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:02I just responded to your quoting. Nothing on here annoys me.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:58HAHA!! It's so obvious when you are annoyed!!! Poor boy. You're getting pretty popular in the forum, aren't you, crusty!?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:56Complete garbage card. I imagine it's as fascinating as your riveting post that you watched it.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:55I see. I'm sure folks found that fascinating. Thank you. It wasn't a very strong card if I remember correctly.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:51The fight in the thread title was on ppv. Hard to find anywhere more relevant than here to mention it. I doubt many knew it was.
I know what you were doing. You thought I was insinuating you didn't see it because it was ppv. I'm not passively aggressive either, very up front. You can add that to your chart as you try to figure out the puzzle of saad.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:04Thank God! I was concerned. Just poking the bear, big guy.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:02I just responded to your quoting. Nothing on here annoys me.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:58HAHA!! It's so obvious when you are annoyed!!! Poor boy. You're getting pretty popular in the forum, aren't you, crusty!?Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:56Complete garbage card. I imagine it's as fascinating as your riveting post that you watched it.oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:55I see. I'm sure folks found that fascinating. Thank you. It wasn't a very strong card if I remember correctly.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 17:51The fight in the thread title was on ppv. Hard to find anywhere more relevant than here to mention it. I doubt many knew it was.![]()
Not at all true. You're not that simple, and I couldn't remember if it was or not and couldn't care really. I didn't see the need to mention it. I thought maybe I missed something. You'll find me rather straight forward. I don't do hidden meaning tricks. It's easier to be blunt.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:08
I know what you were doing. You thought I was insinuating you didn't see it because it was ppv. I'm not passively aggressive either, very up front. You can add that to your chart as you try to figure out the puzzle of saad.![]()
oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:11Not at all true. You're not that simple, and I couldn't remember if it was or not and couldn't care really. I didn't see the need to mention it. I thought maybe I missed something. You'll find me rather straight forward. I don't do hidden meaning tricks. It's easier to be blunt.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:08
I know what you were doing. You thought I was insinuating you didn't see it because it was ppv. I'm not passively aggressive either, very up front. You can add that to your chart as you try to figure out the puzzle of saad.![]()
Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:16oogiebe wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:11Not at all true. You're not that simple, and I couldn't remember if it was or not and couldn't care really. I didn't see the need to mention it. I thought maybe I missed something. You'll find me rather straight forward. I don't do hidden meaning tricks. It's easier to be blunt.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:08
I know what you were doing. You thought I was insinuating you didn't see it because it was ppv. I'm not passively aggressive either, very up front. You can add that to your chart as you try to figure out the puzzle of saad.![]()
![]()
Nope, it's you bruh. Using pictures instead of words.Onetimeonly wrote: ↑26 Feb 2019, 18:19 The dork is the one conversing with an emoticon. I never do that.