Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 15:51
by dagilechia
Where would you rank the likes of Taylor, Braekhus, Shields in their respective divisions? i'd say top 300 is the maximum they could reach fighting against males
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 15:54
by oogiebe
nowhere
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 15:55
by jamamb
we have some people raving about the amazing talent of the likes of clar sheilds, yet imagine what men would do to her if hanna gabriels can drop her and she cant even kd any women
the men are simply far better and stronger, youd have to go well down in the rankings
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 15:58
by Onetimeonly
At best, like 3500. Probably more like 10000. My bad, thought you meant p4p. They could maybe beat a handful. I'm sure shields could beat Rufus.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 16:02
by dagilechia
could you imagine Shields beating the guy in black trunks? he's 22-33-3, ranked 186 at boxrec
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 16:34
by greg
..still have to see a female boxer in a 12 x 3 boxing match...
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 18:12
by keirw
Women are at a natural disadvantage to men.
If a female boxer was to face a male boxer there would have to be a sizable weight handicap.
The woman would have to face a man two or three weight divisions below them just to be competitive, even then...
Could we imagine Shields vs Prograis or Taylor vs Inoue?
Who would your money be on in those fights?
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 18:16
by Cent0089
Where would you rank male synchronized swimmers in female rankings? : D
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 18 Apr 2019, 21:57
by sturm vogel
Women boxers are not fit to work a man's corner let alone stand against him in the ring. That is Hollywood and Socialist fantasy not reality.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 08:39
by Tony1244
sturm vogel wrote: ↑18 Apr 2019, 21:57
Women boxers are not fit to work a man's corner let alone stand against him in the ring. That is Hollywood and Socialist fantasy not reality.
A woman fighting against a man in a ring is one thing. Knowledgable women not being fit to work a corner? Well, you're just being silly.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 08:47
by tigermoth87
Nowhere
Not even top 500. Not even top 1000. Not even 5000.
Snowflakes will screech autistically at this but women can't compete with men in physical sports.
Look at tennis where the Williams sisters faced a man ranked 203, and got destroyed.
In boxing, you could throw in Glass Joe from Mike Tyson's punchout and he'd still beat any woman boxer.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 08:51
by Tony1244
Maybe the best woman can beat a guy ranked #200 or #500. The way the 21st century is going I have a feeling we're going to find out.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 09:15
by Enlightened-One
dagilechia wrote: ↑18 Apr 2019, 15:51
Where would you rank the likes of Taylor, Braekhus, Shields in their respective divisions? i'd say top 300 is the maximum they could reach fighting against males
Why compare women to men? Males possess unfair biological advantages of over females.
Seriously, why bother to even ask such a question?
I personally wouldn’t want to see men punching women in the face.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 09:47
by Boxerbeetle
keirw wrote: ↑18 Apr 2019, 18:12
Women are at a natural disadvantage to men.
If a female boxer was to face a male boxer there would have to be a sizable weight handicap.
The woman would have to face a man two or three weight divisions below them just to be competitive, even then...
Could we imagine Shields vs Prograis or Taylor vs Inoue?
Who would your money be on in those fights?
I didn’t know I wanted to watch Taylor vs Inoue until you mentioned it. Now I really want to see it happen. It’d be Inoue by absolutely disgusting brutal first round ko tho
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 09:47
by Ricky
I'd beat them.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 11:46
by Enlightened-One
sturm vogel wrote: ↑18 Apr 2019, 21:57
Women boxers are not fit to work a man's corner let alone stand against him in the ring.
Ann Wolfe? She was a decent trainer wasn’t she, as well as being a powerful fundamentally sound fighter also?
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 11:54
by wouter
Lucia Rijker once fought a man in her kickboxing days.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 13:36
by dagilechia
let me guess... he was a total nobody, unknown fighter, right?
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 13:38
by jamamb
dagilechia wrote: ↑19 Apr 2019, 13:36
let me guess... he was a total nobody, unknown fighter, right?
as i recall he wasnt a total scrub, but he wasnt a top fighter. so basically its one of the few fights where the man was actually somewhat competnent, and look what happenend, he quickly ktfo'd one of the greatest female kickboxers and boxers of all time. im pretty sure he was actually smaller then her too
most of the mixed sex fights they match the woman with a total scrub, often who doesnt actually have any combat experience.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 13:47
by Lennox
They could only beat a really poor professional.
There was a fight about 20 years ago, one of the top women fought a 0-2 chap Loi Chow with no punch and the woman won, I think it was 4x3 but I am not 100%, also the MAN ruined his career as he never got another fight as far as I recall. I am not sure if the MAN really gave it 100%... So in weight class, just a few at the bottom possibly.
A licensed pro boxer is still pretty good.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 14:08
by greg
Tony1244 wrote: ↑19 Apr 2019, 08:51
Maybe the best woman can beat a guy ranked #200 or #500. ...
...I believe it's only computer software that can differentiate between #200 and #500 and rank them accordingly..I can't keep track beyond those ranked #20+
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 14:32
by gilgamesh
They would all be ranked at or near the very bottom of whatever weight class you're talking about. The very best woman boxer in the world could still be beaten by dozens of guys who are 3 or 4 weight classes smaller than her let alone guys her size.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 14:34
by gilgamesh
greg wrote: ↑18 Apr 2019, 16:34
..still have to see a female boxer in a 12 x 3 boxing match...
All they have to do is schedule any 2 women for that distance. It'll go the full 12. Can't even remember the last time I saw a KO ending in a female fight.
Re: Where would You rank female boxers in male rankings?
Posted: 19 Apr 2019, 14:34
by gilgamesh
Tony1244 wrote: ↑19 Apr 2019, 08:51Maybe the best woman can beat a guy ranked #200 or #500. The way the 21st century is going I have a feeling we're going to find out.