Page 1 of 1

Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 09 Jun 2019, 20:51
by Susej_SOG
Fielding was in the top-15 of the 168 division

The fight was in 168 pounds, not catchweight

Canelo fought against him 3 months later of the rematch vs GGG.

A lot of people was talking sh.it about this fight.


Rolls was not in the top-70 of the 160

Rolls is 35 years old.

Only had 1 fight of 10 rounds.

He never fought against a top-50 fighter


NOBODY IS TALKINH SH.IT ABOUT THIS FIGHT.

The hate against Canelo is too much

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 09 Jun 2019, 21:03
by tiny_acres
I haven't seen too many defend GGG for taking this fight
Pretty much anyone said Rolls had zero chance and GGG needed a better opponent

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 09 Jun 2019, 21:16
by jamamb
bizarre thread, they were both weak ass fights and pretty much no one (well maybe boxing rocks lol) said otherwise, pretty funny that anyone feels the need to defend one being better then the other

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 09 Jun 2019, 21:23
by dagilechia
I have said multiple times that GGG vs Rolls is a boring mismatch. Nobody disagreed with me.

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 09 Jun 2019, 23:51
by Susej_SOG
jamamb wrote: 09 Jun 2019, 21:16 bizarre thread, they were both weak ass fights and pretty much no one (well maybe boxing rocks lol) said otherwise, pretty funny that anyone feels the need to defend one being better then the other
A lot of fans enjoyed the brutal K.O and they are celebrating the win…

False, Fielding was better tan Rolls, that's a fact, not my opinión, Rocky was younger, top-15 of the 168, way bigger tan Canelo .

Rolls was not in top-75.

This fight was one of the worst mismatch ever

And GGG's career is full of fighters like Roll

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 00:08
by jamamb
no one is rating rolls, it was widely hailed as a huge mismatch, both were weak ass fights and too sh!t for really anyone except you i guess to care who was better

ya gggs career is full of soft touches, but who gives a f@ck who was better btwn rolls and fielding, this is iron frost stuff

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 00:28
by Susej_SOG
jamamb wrote: 10 Jun 2019, 00:08 no one is rating rolls, it was widely hailed as a huge mismatch, both were weak ass fights and too sh!t for really anyone except you i guess to care who was better

ya gggs career is full of soft touches, but who gives a f@ck who was better btwn rolls and fielding, this is iron frost stuff
It's a fact, it does not matter what you can say, Fielding was better than Rolls.

The point is GGG always has the press in his side, nobody is talking about the tremendous mismatch, they are celebrating the big K.O.

When Canelo fought against Fielding, all the press and fans were talking sh.it, look the comments in YouTube or Instagram, nobody is talking sh.it about GGG cherrypick.

I was fan of GGG but this guy has a lot of sh.it in his career

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 00:30
by jamamb
hardly seen anyone celebrating, seen waay more ppl call it a crappy mismatch, pretty much no one thinks it was some big win or adds to anyones resume, both awful fights

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 00:36
by Susej_SOG
jamamb wrote: 10 Jun 2019, 00:30 hardly seen anyone celebrating, seen waay more ppl call it a crappy mismatch, pretty much no one thinks it was some big win or adds to anyones resume, both awful fights
Man, this fórum is too small but look this comment:

Thomastearns wrote: 08 Jun 2019, 08:28 I'm impressed with what I've seen of Steve Rolls so far but unfortunately for him it looks like GGG is, shock horror, actually improving.
????

Now, read the comments in YT or Instagram, all the fans of GGG are celebrating and calling out Canelo.

GGG is a diva, man, and he is a master of cherry picks.

He did the same against Murray.

But he was not able to K.O the only two good rivals in his career (Jacobs and Canelo)

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 02:59
by Onetimeonly
It would only be a fact if fielding beat rolle. That would be a tight fight. With all due respect, you're gay.

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 03:03
by Ilya Muromets
Rolls record was not impressive but i thought he put up a good fight and was holding his own until the knockout which i thought was very spectacular. GGG in reality has won every single fight.

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 04:08
by ClivePatrickLyons
And Callum Smith who is the REAL WBA Super Middleweight Champ finished Rocky in one round its a joke the way Golden Boy get away with these fights

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 04:25
by Ruthless-RKO
Rolls put up a better fight than Fielding. If I HAD TO watch one of them again, it would be the GGG fight.

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 05:47
by KiwiRider
ClivePatrickLyons wrote: 10 Jun 2019, 04:08 And Callum Smith who is the REAL WBA Super Middleweight Champ finished Rocky in one round its a joke the way Golden Boy get away with these fights
Right on!
It pisses me off all the talk of Canelo being a SMW champ from beating Fielding :roll:
I like Fielding, he still has plenty of really good domestic tear ups ahead, but he is not a champion, he is a good domestic top #3 on the UK scene- and top #3 because Groves retired.

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 06:08
by jonnyyorkshu
The op needs some sudocrem

Re: Fielding was better than Rolls

Posted: 10 Jun 2019, 07:22
by ironbeard
There should be special conferences for Gingerhead and Fury fans to compare trolling notes at.