How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post Reply
MasterG
Super Featherweight
Posts: 7536
Joined: 08 Aug 2018, 16:45

How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by MasterG »

..who beat Mike Tyson






Discuss
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46561
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by gilgamesh »

He would've barely been Top 10 in the world at that time. Every other active Heavyweight who was somebody at that time would've likely beaten him. He was briefly ranked off beating shot Mike though, but that was a very brief run.

Brewster, Byrd, Ruiz, The Klitschko's (Vitali did beat him), Sam Peter, Toney....I don't really see Danny beating any of those guys.
chrisjs1985
Lightweight
Posts: 783
Joined: 11 Jan 2018, 12:45

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by chrisjs1985 »

Crap, in a word.
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6825
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by Noxy »

He was great. Not really a world class guy though, as pointed out already. Had some top domestic scraps.
Controversial
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9186
Joined: 13 Jul 2002, 18:29

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by Controversial »

He had decent ability but seemed to lack confidence in himself, an underachiever. I stood next to him once and I was surprised just how big he was, he’s a massive lump.
writehooks
Cruiserweight
Posts: 181
Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 13:12

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by writehooks »

I'm not sure he was ever even good enough to beat the Danny Williams on the original Hawaii Five-0.
DrDuke
Lightweight
Posts: 13879
Joined: 29 Nov 2017, 09:15

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by DrDuke »

gilgamesh wrote: 06 Sep 2019, 12:08 He would've barely been Top 10 in the world at that time. Every other active Heavyweight who was somebody at that time would've likely beaten him. He was briefly ranked off beating shot Mike though, but that was a very brief run.

Brewster, Byrd, Ruiz, The Klitschko's (Vitali did beat him), Sam Peter, Toney....I don't really see Danny beating any of those guys.
Gotta agree with this.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16792
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by skanksta »

Only just about top 10 at his best.., but still my AT favourite boxer. :salut:
Kassel
Lightweight
Posts: 65
Joined: 17 Mar 2018, 13:43

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by Kassel »

Danny Williams was ranked in the Top 10 - by both the WBC and WBA - in 2003 :box:

Well known he only got the Tyson fight - at short notice - because Kevin McBride's management were asking for too much money....
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15182
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by Ambling Alp II »

It's almost as if the WBC and the WBA put Williams in the Top 10 so that his fight with Tyson would seem like a bigger deal than it was. .....Wait, there is no way that those two respected organizations would do something like that.
Kassel
Lightweight
Posts: 65
Joined: 17 Mar 2018, 13:43

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by Kassel »

Ambling Alp II wrote: 09 Sep 2019, 14:16 It's almost as if the WBC and the WBA put Williams in the Top 10 so that his fight with Tyson would seem like a bigger deal than it was. .....Wait, there is no way that those two respected organizations would do something like that.
:OhYes:
Danny was outside the Top 10, until he signed with Don King - then, hey presto - he was ranked in the top 10 by both WBC & WBA - just pure co-incidence of course :OhYes:
Onetimeonly
Super Featherweight
Posts: 11584
Joined: 16 Oct 2018, 06:28

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by Onetimeonly »

I bet 4 people $20 even up after the first Rd. Thanks Danny!
cormack
Super Featherweight
Posts: 2965
Joined: 30 May 2019, 07:13

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by cormack »

shite would cover it i think
funso banjo baby
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4417
Joined: 23 Sep 2005, 11:05

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by funso banjo baby »

I tend to disagree a bit.

Danny was certainly a bit short of the top level but he was a ferocious puncher in his day.

I'd have given him a fair chance against someone like Brewster.

The weird thing was Danny's strange wobbly legs syndrome. If he'd had a granite chin he'd have been a def contender at his peak...whenever that was.

anyway, he was a warrior and I wont have a bad word said about him

:box: :bag: :salut:
polecateddy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by polecateddy »

British and Commonwealth level, but a level below European level as evidenced by his results.
Bodyshot3
Middleweight
Posts: 9791
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 15:19

Re: How good was the 2004 Danny Williams..........

Post by Bodyshot3 »

British and Commonwealth level, but a level below European level as evidenced by his results.
That's about spot on PC :salut:

Although Danny was very decent at that Brit-Commonwealth level and certainly one or two lesser Brit champs than him managed to win the blue Euro belt in the past.

The arrival of the seriously big, quite well-schooled and very hungry Eastern European heavies shook-up the European scene in terms of quality, physical ability and ambition big time.

It was no longer a title the Brits, Italians and Germans and the odd Scandinavian shared out between themselves.
Post Reply