Mike Tyson vs Razor Ruddock Fight: Did the Referee Stopped the Fight Too Soon?
Posted: 08 Sep 2019, 22:36
Iron Mike was getting the benefit of a doubt when having a man hurt, the referee was like if he counted very fast. Ever since the Carl "The Truth" Williams fight, the referees had the aura of stopping the fight very quickly once a Tyson's opponent was in trouble or in queer street.
And it happened again in his first fight with dangerous puncher Donovan "Razor" Ruddock of Jamaica. A left hook by Tyson in Ruddock's jaw put him reeling to the ropes. As soon the referee saw that, he stopped the fight and Tyson was the winner by TKO in round 7. But, my question was at the time, "Was it really a TKO win for Iron Mike?" He was winning the fight big time. He dropped Ruddock on the 2nd and 3rd rounds. And Tyson was winning comfortably 59-54 by round 7 in my scorecard. But, in round 6, which was Ruddock's best round, it seemed like he was coming back strong. The other thing was that the knockdown in round 2 should have not be called a knockdown. Ruddock tripped in Tyson's foot. Ruddock protested but the referee still ruled it a knockdown.
Referee Richard Steele was known at the time as a suspicious referee for promoter Don King ever since the Julio Cesar Chavez vs Meldrick Taylor fight #1 the year before.
Was this a possibility of protecting Tyson to win against a dangerous opponent like Ruddock at any cost, or was it that the referee stopped the fight too soon?
Your thoughts.
And it happened again in his first fight with dangerous puncher Donovan "Razor" Ruddock of Jamaica. A left hook by Tyson in Ruddock's jaw put him reeling to the ropes. As soon the referee saw that, he stopped the fight and Tyson was the winner by TKO in round 7. But, my question was at the time, "Was it really a TKO win for Iron Mike?" He was winning the fight big time. He dropped Ruddock on the 2nd and 3rd rounds. And Tyson was winning comfortably 59-54 by round 7 in my scorecard. But, in round 6, which was Ruddock's best round, it seemed like he was coming back strong. The other thing was that the knockdown in round 2 should have not be called a knockdown. Ruddock tripped in Tyson's foot. Ruddock protested but the referee still ruled it a knockdown.
Referee Richard Steele was known at the time as a suspicious referee for promoter Don King ever since the Julio Cesar Chavez vs Meldrick Taylor fight #1 the year before.
Was this a possibility of protecting Tyson to win against a dangerous opponent like Ruddock at any cost, or was it that the referee stopped the fight too soon?
Your thoughts.