BoxRec

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 07:01 By CompuBox

COMPUBOX BY THE NUMBERS

3 - jabs landed per round by Spence after landing 7 per round in his previous 6 fights (welter avg.: 5)

7 - number of rounds in which Spencer & Porter were within 4 connects of each other
(Thurman & Porter were within 5 connects of each other in 10 of 12 rounds in their fight)

9.4 - body shots landed per round by Spence, double the CompuBox avg.

26 - punches landed by Spence in round 12, his high for the fight

26 - punches landed by Porter in round 4, most by a Spence opponent

41% - time spent in close range by Spence-Porter after Porter spent just 17% of the Ugas fight at close range (according to CompuTrack)

44 - power punches thrown per round by Porter vs. Spence after throwing 37 per round in his previous 10 fights, #1 among top tier welterweights

51% - pct. of Spence's landed punches that were to body of Porter (CompuBox Avg. : 29.5%)

62 - punches thrown per round by Porter after averaging 52 per round in his previous 10 fights (welter avg.: 57)

62 - punches thrown per round by Spence after averaging 72 per round in his previous 6 fight

88 - punches thrown by Spence in round 12, his high for the fight

90 - punches thrown by Porter in round 4, most by a Spence opponent

113 - body shots landed by Spence, a career high

172 - punches landed by Porter in the fight, most by a Spence opponent

744 - punches thrown by Porter in the fight, most by a Spence opponent

WHAT WE LEARNED:

• Porter took away Spence’s jab with effective feinting and foot work.

• Porter has now lost razor thin decisions to Spence (they were within 4 connects of each other in 7 of 12 rounds) & Thurman (they were within 5 connects of each other in 10 of 12 rounds).

• Porter is WAY more effective at close range, as 41% of Porter-Spence was fought inside resulting in 172 landed punches by Porter. Just 17% of Porter-Ugas was spend at close range, resulting in just 144 landed punches by Porter.

• Spence’s body attack was the difference in this fight, he landed nearly 10 per round and half his landed punches were to the body of Porter.

• Spence rallied late with the fight in the balance, landing 23 of 80 punches in rounds 11 & 12.

• Needless to say, Porter was Spence’s toughest opponent to date, landing 172 punches, most by a Spence opponent.

Bandog wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 07:46

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 07:01 By CompuBox

COMPUBOX BY THE NUMBERS

3 - jabs landed per round by Spence after landing 7 per round in his previous 6 fights (welter avg.: 5)

7 - number of rounds in which Spencer & Porter were within 4 connects of each other
(Thurman & Porter were within 5 connects of each other in 10 of 12 rounds in their fight)

9.4 - body shots landed per round by Spence, double the CompuBox avg.

26 - punches landed by Spence in round 12, his high for the fight

26 - punches landed by Porter in round 4, most by a Spence opponent

41% - time spent in close range by Spence-Porter after Porter spent just 17% of the Ugas fight at close range (according to CompuTrack)

44 - power punches thrown per round by Porter vs. Spence after throwing 37 per round in his previous 10 fights, #1 among top tier welterweights

51% - pct. of Spence's landed punches that were to body of Porter (CompuBox Avg. : 29.5%)

62 - punches thrown per round by Porter after averaging 52 per round in his previous 10 fights (welter avg.: 57)

62 - punches thrown per round by Spence after averaging 72 per round in his previous 6 fight

88 - punches thrown by Spence in round 12, his high for the fight

90 - punches thrown by Porter in round 4, most by a Spence opponent

113 - body shots landed by Spence, a career high

172 - punches landed by Porter in the fight, most by a Spence opponent

744 - punches thrown by Porter in the fight, most by a Spence opponent

WHAT WE LEARNED:

• Porter took away Spence’s jab with effective feinting and foot work.

• Porter has now lost razor thin decisions to Spence (they were within 4 connects of each other in 7 of 12 rounds) & Thurman (they were within 5 connects of each other in 10 of 12 rounds).

• Porter is WAY more effective at close range, as 41% of Porter-Spence was fought inside resulting in 172 landed punches by Porter. Just 17% of Porter-Ugas was spend at close range, resulting in just 144 landed punches by Porter.

• Spence’s body attack was the difference in this fight, he landed nearly 10 per round and half his landed punches were to the body of Porter.

• Spence rallied late with the fight in the balance, landing 23 of 80 punches in rounds 11 & 12.

• Needless to say, Porter was Spence’s toughest opponent to date, landing 172 punches, most by a Spence opponent.

Needless to say, Spence was Porter's toughest opponent to date, and I'm guessing had the most landed by a Porter opponent, but you left that out. Compubox numbers are legit and make a difference when you want them to.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 11:31 Kell Brook still did the best at negating Porter

dagilechia wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 09:12 compubox stats are bullśhit, almost always wrong and almost always favour the A side fighter

Duran1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 12:25 I hate how these numbers are forced fed to the viewers every fight that's aired..as if a fighter must've won a round by outlanding his opponent 7-5... amateurish scoring

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 12:59

Duran1970 wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 12:25 I hate how these numbers are forced fed to the viewers every fight that's aired..as if a fighter must've won a round by outlanding his opponent 7-5... amateurish scoring

Anyone that thinks like that is just plain stupid..

gilgamesh wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 11:33

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 11:31 Kell Brook still did the best at negating Porter

I didn't watch Spence vs Porter yet, but from all the feedback that would seem to be accurate. I don't really recall anybody questioning Brook's win in the slightest.

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 22:45 Doesn't matter what any commentator said, Brook handled Porter and pretty much defused him. Clear 8-4 type of win and got the decision in the USA. If anyone scored that for Porter then LOL, total example of being a sucker for ineffective flailing.

james5000+ wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 22:50

margaret thatcher wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 22:45 Doesn't matter what any commentator said, Brook handled Porter and pretty much defused him. Clear 8-4 type of win and got the decision in the USA. If anyone scored that for Porter then LOL, total example of being a sucker for ineffective flailing.

When someone claims nobody doubted the result it does matter.

Porter was basically all over Brook like a rash. No doubt Brook landed a lot of eye catching punches but he was out worked for a lot of the fight.

Spence landed more and landed the more eye catching punches and got the KD

Spence also whooped Brooks ass

Impractical Poster wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 10:17

Bandog wrote: ↑01 Oct 2019, 07:46

Needless to say, Spence was Porter's toughest opponent to date, and I'm guessing had the most landed by a Porter opponent, but you left that out. Compubox numbers are legit and make a difference when you want them to.

I think you have the names mixed up Dog.