Is Glen Johnson really Archie Moore?
Posted: 16 Dec 2004, 11:38


Stick to heavyweights Bubi. He kicked Ulrich's arse big-style and only AFTER battering Roy Jones was Jones considered totally shot. Where were you when the odds on a Johnson win were something like 8/1? Tipping Jones no doubt.BubiScholz wrote:i think he is just a top ten boxer. RJJ is done. a lot of guys would beat him. i watched both fights vs Woods and of course the one vs. Svennie-darling. Johnson hasn´t convinced till now.
and Branco... who showed his class by schooling the talented Ulrich for 11 rounds before walking onto a huge shotjamesmcdonnell wrote:Should have got the nod against Gonzales too, and Judah....
Ulrich was no top ten boxer when he fought Johnson. he only was convincing in his last fight and in the fight vs Rocky. but Sven Otke outclassed him in super middle. a win vs Jones is like a win vs Tyson. as i have always said Jones was overrated in the last ten years. after the Tarver-fight a knock out was not out of reach. i was cheering for Johnson in this fight BTW. i have never been a supporter of RJJ. you should know that.bennie wrote:Stick to heavyweights Bubi. He kicked Ulrich's arse big-style and only AFTER battering Roy Jones was Jones considered totally shot. Where were you when the odds on a Johnson win were something like 8/1? Tipping Jones no doubt.BubiScholz wrote:i think he is just a top ten boxer. RJJ is done. a lot of guys would beat him. i watched both fights vs Woods and of course the one vs. Svennie-darling. Johnson hasn´t convinced till now.
Ive foten thought of this also. strange how you never see the two of them in the same ring together eh??bennie wrote:Maybe it's just me, but Glen looks remarkably like the Ol' Mongoose in that shot. Fitting, really, given he's a throwback fighter.

He wasn't outclassed by Ottke. The German really struggled with the hard-hitting, clever style of the Jamaican and needed a big finish to get home by two scores of 115-113 and 116-112 (in Dusseldorf).BubiScholz wrote:Ulrich was no top ten boxer when he fought Johnson. he only was convincing in his last fight and in the fight vs Rocky. but Sven Otke outclassed him in super middle. a win vs Jones is like a win vs Tyson. as i have always said Jones was overrated in the last ten years. after the Tarver-fight a knock out was not out of reach. i was cheering for Johnson in this fight BTW. i have never been a supporter of RJJ. you should know that.bennie wrote:Stick to heavyweights Bubi. He kicked Ulrich's arse big-style and only AFTER battering Roy Jones was Jones considered totally shot. Where were you when the odds on a Johnson win were something like 8/1? Tipping Jones no doubt.BubiScholz wrote:i think he is just a top ten boxer. RJJ is done. a lot of guys would beat him. i watched both fights vs Woods and of course the one vs. Svennie-darling. Johnson hasn´t convinced till now.
Ulrich was just a 25-year-old talent. and otke is a super middle. that shows that Johnson is nothing special in light heavy.bennie wrote:He wasn't outclassed by Ottke. The German really struggled with the hard-hitting, clever style of the Jamaican and needed a big finish to get home by two scores of 115-113 and 116-112 (in Dusseldorf).BubiScholz wrote:Ulrich was no top ten boxer when he fought Johnson. he only was convincing in his last fight and in the fight vs Rocky. but Sven Otke outclassed him in super middle. a win vs Jones is like a win vs Tyson. as i have always said Jones was overrated in the last ten years. after the Tarver-fight a knock out was not out of reach. i was cheering for Johnson in this fight BTW. i have never been a supporter of RJJ. you should know that.bennie wrote: Stick to heavyweights Bubi. He kicked Ulrich's arse big-style and only AFTER battering Roy Jones was Jones considered totally shot. Where were you when the odds on a Johnson win were something like 8/1? Tipping Jones no doubt.
And Ulrich was 20-0 when he got turned over in his own hometown of Berlin by Johnson.
Ulrich was there a top 20 or top 30 fighter. maybe now he is top ten. that´s what i wanted to say.jamesmcdonnell wrote:What do you mean JUST 25, like that makes him a teenager or something.
Yet another case of someone not wanting to give a non-european any credit.
What about Gonzales? Gonzales was good enough to beat Dariusz, even if Dariusz was past his best, he was still a top 5 LH, and Johnson beat
Johnson is a small light heavyweight, but that doesn't make him a poor fighter.
I am going for the upset with Johnson against Tarver, I'm pretty much a lone voice pissing in the wind.
Agreed. A freak in the nicest possible sense. His career stats will never be equalled.topper123 wrote:IMO Archie Moore is a top ten all time great, 28 year boxing career, won 185 (131 ko's) - lost 24 - drawn 11 - tot 221 .
131 Ko's, what a puncher.
I always think my mate James looks like Sonny Liston. and the strange thing is ive never seen liston, glencoffee or james in the one room at the same time...stujones wrote:I always thought there was a physical resemblence between Johnson and Sonny Liston
According to Moore, hogue was a great fighter, in those days though, losses were no big deal, you took them as part of your learning process, and picked up and carried on. Bearing in mind that nobody saw videos of one another, or even knew their opponents records, it's not surprising really. Moore was also a very small light heavyweight for most of his career often weighing in under 170 on the night.MightyWarrior wrote:Amazing to think a guy called Shorty Hogue had THREE wins over Moore.
How good must've that guy been?
Archie got him in the end though, when he came in as a last minute sub for his brother....Big Boy Houge!!
http://www.boxrec.com/boxer_display.php?boxer_id=009985