BoxRec

If they put that on PPV they may as well forget it

Yes, I have this feeling also. Sky a stating shows they are showing in March, but no mention of this. Calzaghe, Eastman, Hopkins, Amir Khan - looks like a PPV.

I might go for it providing Calzaghe is fighting someone decent (or someone ranked in the top ten).

stujones wrote:I might go for it providing Calzaghe is fighting someone decent (or someone ranked in the top ten).

So you won't be going for it then stu

calzaghe card is happening on the 11th

I thought Khan's fights where going to be shown on the BBC (well his fights for the next 18 months)

How does this fit in and around SKY is interesting.

I get PPV for free anyway so will be watching it regardless..

Calzaghe can barely draw flies to a turd no way is he going to be on PPV.

but he"s an undefeated world champ on the brink of a career defining un
ification superfight,this is going to be his year etc etc

calzaghe will be fighting scott pemberton, probably.

another blow out, another waste of time, and yes i also think they will have the gall to put it on ppv.

There is no way Calzaghe v Pemberton will be on PPV.

Twinkle Toes wrote:I thought Khan's fights where going to be shown on the BBC (well his fights for the next 18 months)

How does this fit in and around SKY is interesting.

Good question.

its on a allegedly show, allegedly has done a deal with the ABA. sky have rights to show whats on his show, bbc are only showing khan fights when he fights Tournaments or nations matches me thinks

whats this new allegedly feature after i write a promoter name

They can suck my cock. I am never ever going to pay to watch Calzaghe or Hatton unless its against the very best. And even then it will have to be a special fight.

Talk about killing boxing. First they cut down their live fights, more mismatches than ever, Ringside and Fightschool gone and now this.

Lefthookhappy19 wrote:They can suck my cock. I am never ever going to pay to watch Calzaghe or Hatton unless its against the very best. And even then it will have to be a special fight.

Talk about killing boxing. First they cut down their live fights, more mismatches than ever, Ringside and Fightschool gone and now this.

I see what you're saying but no PPV has been announced people are speculating. There is no way it will be a PPV its a friday night fight on Feb 11th nothing to do with Eastman v Hopkins at all. Eastman is with Hennessy.

Surely Eastman will be on BBC?

If not on Sunday afternoon grandstand, then Sunday night - and late.

I doubt we'll see it live over here so have to dust off the old wireless and tune into Five Live.

Since the purseoffer was won by Golden boy promotions (GBP) they are the one that have the UK tv right, so it really depends on who will offer GBP the most money/or do GBP already have a deal with eother SKY or BBC?

sky sports boxing is so bad they havent even done a knock outs of 2004 show. :(

REAL_DEAL wrote:sky sports boxing is so bad they havent even done a knock outs of 2004 show. :(

They have a programme on news years eve...although Alexander might have made in a no contest (unless they have some Roy Jones coverage).

As for the PPV, Calzaghe Vs Veit will never be PPV.

REAL_DEAL wrote:sky sports boxing is so bad they havent even done a knock outs of 2004 show. :(

Yes I noticed that tp. Oh well I have the 2003 show on tape maybe I will dig that out.