BoxRec

So, apparently only one question left out there. Well, it has never been a question to me, but still a lot of other people were considering Joshua as the best. Now there's no 3 kings, only 2 left. Joshua is gonna fight Pulev or someone else soon. Maybe WBO will give him other mandatory afterwards and Fury also will make a defence. But theoretically they can meet in late 2020 or somewhere in 2021 to determine, how is the one and the only king. Of course, it's The Gypsy King, but let's do a poll.

I'd say probably Fury.

It's completely different from fighting Wilder. Wilder can't box for shit, he was getting out boxed by that scrub Washington. His freak power helps him out.

So for someone like Fury whose so exceptionally skilled it shows a huge difference.

But Joshua actually is highly skilled himself. Maybe not as much as Fury but more so than Wilder.

Fury won't box Joshua silly like he could Wilder. Fury can't bully and push around Joshua like he could Wilder because Joshua is a hulk of a man himself. Then of course Joshua is a real big puncher too more so than Fury.

So I don't know but probably Fury on points.

It would be 50/50 fight................

If a fight of Tyson Fury vs Oluwafemi Olaseni can't be made in Vegas it won't be made at all.

I can't really see how AJ wins this he can't outbox Fury he looked fragile Vs Ruiz I can see Fury roughing him if he wants or outboxing him of course AJ has. Punchers chance but Fury has shown a great chin Vs Wilder

In my opinion Fury just beat his biggest potential rival. Styles make fights, and I never thought AJ had what it takes to beat Tyson (or Wilder for that matter).

This forum is a pretty strange place. A week ago, at least 70% posters would have been vote for Joshua.

ValMar wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 11:37 This forum is a pretty strange place. A week ago, at least 70% posters would have been vote for Joshua.

If you think this is a strange place nip over to off topic when Stuarty in on form.

ValMar wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 11:37 This forum is a pretty strange place. A week ago, at least 70% posters would have been vote for Joshua.

It’s always been fairly fashionable to shite on Fury here, but it’s even more fashionable to jump on bandwagons

sturm vogel wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 11:10 If a fight of Tyson Fury vs Oluwafemi Olaseni can't be made in Vegas it won't be made at all.

Why use middle names for Anthony Joshua? It's weird.

Maybe the fight could happen in the Spring of 2021, but I have a feeling Wilder will exersise his rematch clause within the 30 days. Money is too good to not do it.

Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 11:50

sturm vogel wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 11:10 If a fight of Tyson Fury vs Oluwafemi Olaseni can't be made in Vegas it won't be made at all.

Why use middle names for Anthony Joshua? It's weird.

Prefix and suffix names aside, Olaseni is a proud Nigerian. Why hide it?

sturm vogel wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 11:54

Lenny Cravats wrote: ↑23 Feb 2020, 11:50

Why use middle names for Anthony Joshua? It's weird.

Prefix and suffix names aside, Olaseni is a proud Nigerian. Why hide it?

Probably for the same reason that no one else calls people by their middle names unless they request it.

My middle name is Scott, a proud Scottish name. I don't hide it, but no ones calls me that because it's not my first name - it would be weird if they did.

Tyson's name is Luke. As a proud Christian, why not refer to him as Luke Fury from now on?

I'm pretty sure that's it almost international standard to address people by the first names or given names. I mean, it's what they were given them for.
Why are you addressing someone by the middle names when you don't know personally them? It's weird.