Page 1 of 3
Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 15:55
by margaret thatcher
Seeing that del could easily go to 32-10 this week, it made me wonder who the best boxers since the 2000s with 10 or more losses are. obviously the greats of past generations had tons of fights and many had more than 10 losses, but these days guys are less active and more cherry picking usually
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:21
by brilo33
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 15:55
Seeing that del could easily go to 32-10 this week, it made me wonder who the best boxers since the 2000s with 10 or more losses are. obviously the greats of past generations had tons of fights and many had more than 10 losses, but these days guys are less active and more cherry picking usually
Erik Morales 9 loses
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:30
by (craig)
Mosley - 10 but it should be 11 because De la Hoya won that second fight imo.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:34
by Ruthless-RKO
Holyfield count?
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:37
by DrDuke
Glen Johnson 21.
Oliver McCall 14.
Ricardo Mayorga 12.
Gabriel Rosado 12.
James Toney 10.
And almost there:
Roy Jones 9.
Steve Cunningham 9.
Andrew Golota 9.
Hasim Rahman 9.
John Ruiz 9.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:38
by Ruthless-RKO
Can’t have guys like Miguel Roman? Salido?
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:47
by brilo33
(craig) wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:30
Mosley - 10 but it should be 11 because De la Hoya won that second fight imo.
Shane Mosley great shout brilliant boxer
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:53
by jameswilson
brilo33 wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:21
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 15:55
Seeing that del could easily go to 32-10 this week, it made me wonder who the best boxers since the 2000s with 10 or more losses are. obviously the greats of past generations had tons of fights and many had more than 10 losses, but these days guys are less active and more cherry picking usually
Erik Morales 9 loses

Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 16:57
by Coco
Danny Wiliams
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 17:00
by brilo33
jameswilson wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:53
brilo33 wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:21
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 15:55
Seeing that del could easily go to 32-10 this week, it made me wonder who the best boxers since the 2000s with 10 or more losses are. obviously the greats of past generations had tons of fights and many had more than 10 losses, but these days guys are less active and more cherry picking usually
Erik Morales 9 loses
i know its not 10 but great fighters dont lose 10 these days think mosley is best call
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 17:06
by skanksta
Chris Edwards was definitely one of the world's best fighters with a losing record at one point. Something like 12-13 when he won the British ?
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 17:08
by TheGman
(craig) wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:30
Mosley - 10 but it should be 11 because De la Hoya won that second fight imo.
Me too,1st one mosley was crisp and sharp,way too quick for de la hoya but 2nd oscar turned it round but the judges where friends with Terry O'Connor
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 17:09
by margaret thatcher
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:38
Can’t have guys like Miguel Roman? Salido?
can have them for sure, as long as 10 or more losses ...the mexicans are prob a good one for this threa
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 18:11
by Ruthless-RKO
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 17:09
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:38
Can’t have guys like Miguel Roman? Salido?
can have them for sure, as long as 10 or more losses ...the mexicans are prob a good one for this threa
It’s just that it said best.. but I guess they are former world champions..
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 30 Oct 2020, 18:44
by Grilling Machine
Khamitski was still a handful for most with 10 losses.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 03:19
by Boxing Prospect
Maybe not one of the elite ones, but certainly in the chasing group:
Gilberto Keb Baas 22
Rey Megrino 20
Tomas Rojas 19
Sonny Boy Jaro 15
Rey Loreto 15
Kohei Kono 12
Edgar Sosa 11
Jhnonny Gonzalez 11
Darchiyan is a nearly man on 9
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 05:49
by deadpan
Emmanuel Augustus.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 07:59
by Boxing Prospect
Kompyak Porpramook becomes the latest to join this club after losing to Thai prodigy Nonthasith Petchnamthong (2-0) earlier today!
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 08:23
by Jimmy2020
Domestically Micahel Gomez is up there. He was outstanding just couldn't fully apply himself.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 09:39
by Old bones Ian
Evander Holyfield 10 losses
Jhonny Gonzalez 11 losses
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 10:29
by dookus
Only one vote for me. With 16 losses...
Datsue wrote:]
An actual advert from the back of The Ring, circa 1999 wrote:
Gotta vacant title fight to fill? Call 1-800-WEIRDLY-HERKY-JERKY & book Manuel Medina today! Will contest absolutely any sort of vacant belt! Guaranteed successful first defence for someone who probably doesn't deserve their title anyway*! Willing to travel to your boy's back garden & accept lawn ornaments as judges! Cuts easily! Can't punch! What are you waiting for?!?!? Him to get old? HE ALREADY IS!!!! For excess punishment to take its toll? IT ALREADY HAS!!! HE'S BEEN A PRO SINCE HE WAS ABOUT ELEVEN!!!
Call 1-800-WEIRDLY-HERKY-JERKY today!
*: NB: Nueva Weirdly-Herky-Jerky Inc LLc accepts no responsibility should your boy actually be fuckin' clueless enough to follow Manuel around all night eating flounced jabs & zero-leverage right crosses. An inability to cut off the ring will be sorely exposed by liberal applications of Manuel Medina-ness. Even if your boy is fuckin' clueless enough to lose to him, we guarantee you a rematch within twelve days, or before Manuel's cuts have healed properly, whichever is sooner. Your statutory rights are not affected.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 10:39
by gilgamesh
DrDuke wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:37
Glen Johnson 21.
Oliver McCall 14.
Ricardo Mayorga 12.
Gabriel Rosado 12.
James Toney 10.
Ignoring the "Almost there's" and adding a few more that are.
Orlando Salido
Emanuel Augustus
Manuel Medina
Who was that British guy nicknamed "The Upsetter" he had some notable wins, and had well over 10 losses.
Didn't Johnny Nelson lose more than 10 fights? I don't recall if he had any fights after 2000 or not though.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 10:41
by gilgamesh
Old bones Ian wrote: ↑31 Oct 2020, 09:39
Evander Holyfield 10 losses
Jhonny Gonzalez 11 losses
Loved me some Ja-Honey.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 10:41
by DrDuke
gilgamesh wrote: ↑31 Oct 2020, 10:39
Didn't Johnny Nelson lose more than 10 fights? I don't recall if he had any fights after 2000 or not though.
Right, he had 12 and he had a quite long streak of the WBO defences in the 2000s.
Re: Best boxers since the 2000s with 10+ losses
Posted: 31 Oct 2020, 10:42
by gilgamesh
TheGman wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 17:08
(craig) wrote: ↑30 Oct 2020, 16:30
Mosley - 10 but it should be 11 because De la Hoya won that second fight imo.
Me too,1st one mosley was crisp and sharp,way too quick for de la hoya but 2nd oscar turned it round but the judges where friends with Terry O'Connor
I thought Mosley deserved the rematch personally, but it was definitely WAY more competitive and debatable than the 1st bout.
Ironically the 2nd one was a Unanimous Decision for Mosley while the 1st was a Split.
Sometimes Boxing just don't make no kinda sense. Because even though I thought Mosley won, that was definitely a Split Decision kinda bout if I ever saw one.