Page 1 of 2

2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 15:53
by apollo creed
2018 Golovkin that fought Canelo vs 2005 Taylor who fought Hopkins ?

2018 Golovkin that fought Canelo vs 2001 Trinidad who fought Hopkins?

2018 Golovkin that fought Canelo vs 2004 ODLH who fought Sturm and Hopkins?


@ 160 lbs of course! :box:

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 16:27
by DrDuke
Golovkin would bash all of them out. And he'd kick Hopkins butt too.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 16:31
by gilgamesh
The 2018 Golovkin would probably be even money against the very best Taylor. He'd outbox Trinidad and probably stop him late, same as he would De La Hoya.

If you say the 2015 version of Golovkin he knocks 'em all out, and dominates the fight every step of the way.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 16:32
by gilgamesh
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:27 Golovkin would bash all of them out. And he'd kick Hopkins butt too.
I don't see him beating Hopkins. Especially not the 2018 version of him. If it's the Hopkins that fought Taylor who had basically outgrown Middleweight, and was not getting the best performances out of his body in those fights Golovkin could beat him, but if it's the best Middleweight Hopkins I'd pick Hopkins to win a decision more often than not.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 16:46
by DrDuke
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:32
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:27 Golovkin would bash all of them out. And he'd kick Hopkins butt too.
I don't see him beating Hopkins. Especially not the 2018 version of him. If it's the Hopkins that fought Taylor who had basically outgrown Middleweight, and was not getting the best performances out of his body in those fights Golovkin could beat him, but if it's the best Middleweight Hopkins I'd pick Hopkins to win a decision more often than not.
Both of them are similar with reigning at a comparably weak MW division. Golovkin is better as a boxer though. Hopkins' dirty tricks wouldn't work. He's not elusive enough. Golovkin will make him to feel the power. I see Golovkin at least confidently outworking Hopkins.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 16:49
by gilgamesh
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:46
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:32
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:27 Golovkin would bash all of them out. And he'd kick Hopkins butt too.
I don't see him beating Hopkins. Especially not the 2018 version of him. If it's the Hopkins that fought Taylor who had basically outgrown Middleweight, and was not getting the best performances out of his body in those fights Golovkin could beat him, but if it's the best Middleweight Hopkins I'd pick Hopkins to win a decision more often than not.
Both of them are similar with reigning at a comparably weak MW division. Golovkin is better as a boxer though. Hopkins' dirty tricks wouldn't work. He's not elusive enough. Golovkin will make him to feel the power. I see Golovkin at least confidently outworking Hopkins.
I think it'd be a competitive bout, but yes Hopkins dirty tricks would indeed work. He has superior timing and knowing WHEN to attack then Golovkin. Golovkin definitely has more power, and probably equal speed, Hopkins has better timing, and more tricks up his sleeve.

I wouldn't call Hopkins a "Dirty" Fighter. I'd call him a crafty fighter. He didn't just foul relentlessly, but he knew how to get little extra advantages when he needed them. Something like that would give him the edge against Golovkin.

Hopkins also always took a good shot too so I don't see Golovkin stopping him or even knocking him down to be quite honest.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 17:04
by apollo creed
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:27 Golovkin would bash all of them out. And he'd kick Hopkins butt too.
Probably.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 17:23
by apollo creed
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:31 The 2018 Golovkin would probably be even money against the very best Taylor. He'd outbox Trinidad and probably stop him late, same as he would De La Hoya.

If you say the 2015 version of Golovkin he knocks 'em all out, and dominates the fight every step of the way.

Yup, but 2018 Golovkin beat Canelo which is a great win. I put that version of GGG. But yeah 2012-2015 version of G was fresher and sharper.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 17:27
by apollo creed
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:46
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:32
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:27 Golovkin would bash all of them out. And he'd kick Hopkins butt too.
I don't see him beating Hopkins. Especially not the 2018 version of him. If it's the Hopkins that fought Taylor who had basically outgrown Middleweight, and was not getting the best performances out of his body in those fights Golovkin could beat him, but if it's the best Middleweight Hopkins I'd pick Hopkins to win a decision more often than not.
Both of them are similar with reigning at a comparably weak MW division. Golovkin is better as a boxer though. Hopkins' dirty tricks wouldn't work. He's not elusive enough. Golovkin will make him to feel the power. I see Golovkin at least confidently outworking Hopkins.
Golovkin has a very good powerful jab that would've punished Hopkins.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 17:34
by apollo creed
GGG beat Jacobs and Canelo ( a very strong and upgraded version of Canelo) which imo is better than any win of Hopkins at mw. Hopkins got beat by Taylor two times.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 18:10
by gilgamesh
apollo creed wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 17:27
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:46
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:32

I don't see him beating Hopkins. Especially not the 2018 version of him. If it's the Hopkins that fought Taylor who had basically outgrown Middleweight, and was not getting the best performances out of his body in those fights Golovkin could beat him, but if it's the best Middleweight Hopkins I'd pick Hopkins to win a decision more often than not.
Both of them are similar with reigning at a comparably weak MW division. Golovkin is better as a boxer though. Hopkins' dirty tricks wouldn't work. He's not elusive enough. Golovkin will make him to feel the power. I see Golovkin at least confidently outworking Hopkins.
Golovkin has a very good powerful jab that would've punished Hopkins.
Taylor had a great jab. Hopkins took it away from him.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 10 Jan 2021, 18:11
by gilgamesh
apollo creed wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 17:34 GGG beat Jacobs and Canelo ( a very strong and upgraded version of Canelo) which imo is better than any win of Hopkins at mw. Hopkins got beat by Taylor two times.
Hopkins dominating and stopping Tito is better than losing controversial decisions to Canelo.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 11 Jan 2021, 07:37
by DrDuke
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 18:11
apollo creed wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 17:34 GGG beat Jacobs and Canelo ( a very strong and upgraded version of Canelo) which imo is better than any win of Hopkins at mw. Hopkins got beat by Taylor two times.
Hopkins dominating and stopping Tito is better than losing controversial decisions to Canelo.
It hard to say, especially acknowledging that the 1st fight was a quite clear robbery. Canelo is a much more fitting fighter for the MW limit, than Tito, whose best achievements had been lower.

Golovkin most likely wouldn't stop Hopkins, but I see him clearly outworking and outscoring Hopkins. Yes, Hopkins' timing is better, but Golovkin has better speed, power, workrate and punch resistance. Hopkins' timing wouldn't be crucial because of Golovkin's freakish chin.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 11 Jan 2021, 16:49
by IKSRTFO
Prime Hopkins being punished by 2018 GGG? Some of y'all smokin the good good.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 11 Jan 2021, 20:43
by margaret thatcher
ggg couldnt lay a glove on hopkins, hop would tool him

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 11 Jan 2021, 21:42
by Jeff_lacy_ko
Ggg isnt hard to hit and i agree hop schools him

Ggg vs Taylor is a ggg win. Taylor struggled witb pavliks jab and GGG jab is better and he has better footwork and combinations than pavlik

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 11 Jan 2021, 21:43
by Jeff_lacy_ko
Plus hopkins is stronger hed frustrate ggg inside and outbox him like jacobs from the outside

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 12 Jan 2021, 10:28
by apollo creed
DrDuke wrote: 11 Jan 2021, 07:37
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 18:11
apollo creed wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 17:34 GGG beat Jacobs and Canelo ( a very strong and upgraded version of Canelo) which imo is better than any win of Hopkins at mw. Hopkins got beat by Taylor two times.
Hopkins dominating and stopping Tito is better than losing controversial decisions to Canelo.
It hard to say, especially acknowledging that the 1st fight was a quite clear robbery. Canelo is a much more fitting fighter for the MW limit, than Tito, whose best achievements had been lower.

Golovkin most likely wouldn't stop Hopkins, but I see him clearly outworking and outscoring Hopkins. Yes, Hopkins' timing is better, but Golovkin has better speed, power, workrate and punch resistance. Hopkins' timing wouldn't be crucial because of Golovkin's freakish chin.
:TU:
True. Canelo is big framed and stocky as a fighter. Look at him at 168 lbs! He's even stronger! Canelo was a natural MW fighting at 154 lbs back in the day.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 12 Jan 2021, 10:34
by apollo creed
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 11 Jan 2021, 21:42 Ggg isnt hard to hit and i agree hop schools him

Ggg vs Taylor is a ggg win. Taylor struggled witb pavliks jab and GGG jab is better and he has better footwork and combinations than pavlik
Yup, GGG isn't hard to hit but the problem is he has good timing and power and when he hits you, you feel it! So I think Hopkins would get hit by GGG. Also GGG is a skilled fighter too. You don't win so many fights at ams and beat Jacobs and Canelo just with power. GGG boxed pretty well vs Canelo in their first fight. :TU:

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 12 Jan 2021, 10:38
by apollo creed
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 18:10
apollo creed wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 17:27
DrDuke wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 16:46

Both of them are similar with reigning at a comparably weak MW division. Golovkin is better as a boxer though. Hopkins' dirty tricks wouldn't work. He's not elusive enough. Golovkin will make him to feel the power. I see Golovkin at least confidently outworking Hopkins.
Golovkin has a very good powerful jab that would've punished Hopkins.
Taylor had a great jab. Hopkins took it away from him.
But Hopkins still lost 2 times against him.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 12 Jan 2021, 11:01
by apollo creed
I don't understand why people rate so high the win of Hopkins over Tito? Tito was a great fighter but at 147 lbs! It's not like Hopkins beat a fully grown mw in Tito!

At mw Hopkins lost one time vs RJJ two times vs Taylor.(two top mw opponents). Hopkins beat Mercado, JD Jackson, Glen Johnson and Joppy as fully grown mw opponents. :TU:

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 12 Jan 2021, 12:18
by IKSRTFO
apollo creed wrote: 12 Jan 2021, 11:01 I don't understand why people rate so high the win of Hopkins over Tito? Tito was a great fighter but at 147 lbs! It's not like Hopkins beat a fully grown mw in Tito!

At mw Hopkins lost one time vs RJJ two times vs Taylor.(two top mw opponents). Hopkins beat Mercado, JD Jackson, Glen Johnson and Joppy as fully grown mw opponents. :TU:
Tito was beating legit middleweights up leading to the fight. He was even favored over Hopkins. All of a sudden, the win is overrated.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 12 Jan 2021, 16:49
by gilgamesh
margaret thatcher wrote: 11 Jan 2021, 20:43 ggg couldnt lay a glove on hopkins, hop would tool him
I mean Golovkin is no scrub. He'd have his moments, but Hopkins would almost certainly have more of them. I'd confidently pick Hopkins let's put it that way.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 12 Jan 2021, 16:51
by gilgamesh
apollo creed wrote: 12 Jan 2021, 10:38
gilgamesh wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 18:10
apollo creed wrote: 10 Jan 2021, 17:27

Golovkin has a very good powerful jab that would've punished Hopkins.
Taylor had a great jab. Hopkins took it away from him.
But Hopkins still lost 2 times against him.
He did. I think his body had outgrown the Middleweight division for the 2 Taylor fights. When he moved up to Light Heavyweight he started performing at a higher level again, he was still good enough to make both Taylor fights close, but I don't think he belonged at 160 anymore by that point.

Re: 2018 Golovkin vs 2005 Jermain Taylor/ vs 2001 Felix Trinidad / vs 2004 ODLH - who would win and how?

Posted: 13 Jan 2021, 07:39
by apollo creed
IKSRTFO wrote: 12 Jan 2021, 12:18
apollo creed wrote: 12 Jan 2021, 11:01 I don't understand why people rate so high the win of Hopkins over Tito? Tito was a great fighter but at 147 lbs! It's not like Hopkins beat a fully grown mw in Tito!

At mw Hopkins lost one time vs RJJ two times vs Taylor.(two top mw opponents). Hopkins beat Mercado, JD Jackson, Glen Johnson and Joppy as fully grown mw opponents. :TU:
Tito was beating legit middleweights up leading to the fight. He was even favored over Hopkins. All of a sudden, the win is overrated.
Who ? It was just William Joppy in a weak mw era. Then that guy lost to all top MW's.