Page 1 of 4

Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 09:10
by Enlightened-One
Bob Arum: “We’re not paying Wilder to step aside. It’s better to get rid of him and go about our business. We can make the Fury-Joshua fight for November or December.”

Thoughts? :confused:

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 09:13
by joshj909
Would probably be a Fury decision this time. Wilder will be more tentative and try using new techniques he's recently learnt such as the jab. Wont do as many PPV buys as nobody cares.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 09:13
by Enlightened-One
A fight that no one wants to see, other than Wilder fans and the lawyers that were paid handsomely to gain the arbitration verdict.

Wilder loses and retires.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 09:14
by Noxy
It’s become boring. No fight is worth so much blah blah.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 09:52
by Bard of Boxrec
Getting paid off would be a perfect spot for wilder, get money without getting beat up again, talk about no brainer. Put up just enough protest to retain some dignity.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 09:57
by ironbeard
I think Bob is trolling for AJ money to payoff Wilder with.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 10:00
by IRONFIST
Fury should just dump the belt and get on with the Joshua fight, let Wilder fight Usyk for the vacant belt.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 10:01
by bobcatbox
This is one way to call Wilder’s bluff and make him take a smaller payout. Basically says “alright come fight us ASAP” if you’re really in shape. Smart move by Uncle Bob.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 11:10
by Jeff_lacy_ko
No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 11:15
by squiggy
Utterly stupid situation

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 12:35
by snake33
Wilder is ruined mentally. This will be his last fight, for now.
He should have been on his second interim fight
by now, with his confidence renewed and a shot
at winning. Instead he sat around and whined,
fired his coaching staff and hired a new scape
goat. He'll retire and make a bad come back in
a year or so when he burns through his money.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 13:21
by Enlightened-One
IRONFIST wrote: 18 May 2021, 10:00 Fury should just dump the belt and get on with the Joshua fight, let Wilder fight Usyk for the vacant belt.
It seems that Fury is legally-obliged to face Wilder, unless the Brit pays-off the American.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 13:30
by Enlightened-One
The only good thing to come out of the arbitration situation is Wilder’s imminent retirement (when he suffers a third Fury loss) and potentially Usyk hanging up his gloves too.

Not that I dislike Usyk, but he’s not big enough to compete at heavyweight. He’s also injury prone and struggled badly against a fringe contender, which suggests he may already be past-his-prime.

So Usyk may as well be highly-rewarded for losing to Joshua, before hanging up his gloves to enjoy the fruits of his illustrious career.

The top-ten rated heavyweight rankings has become stale and needs fresh blood.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 13:33
by cormack
same outcome anyway

wilders not a threat

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 13:45
by Ruthless-RKO
Enlightened-One wrote: 18 May 2021, 13:21
IRONFIST wrote: 18 May 2021, 10:00 Fury should just dump the belt and get on with the Joshua fight, let Wilder fight Usyk for the vacant belt.
It seems that Fury is legally-obliged to face Wilder, unless the Brit pays-off the American.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 13:48
by Scott14833
I don't think I'll stay up till 5am to watch this one....

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 14:15
by maverick23
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 11:10 No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank
I think it depends on whether Fury or Wilder have any guarantees in their deals. Given by most accounts their last fight lost money for the networks I would have thought they’d just spend less on promotion, agree smaller guarantees for the fighters and take something like 500k buys.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 16:08
by H8Usernames
I think that this is perfect both for Fury and Joshua. A legitimate reason to postpone their fight and to build up some more hype around it. Big question is how can that be done?

AJ will need a fight in the meantime. Who should he have a go at while waiting? It's kinda problematic how few hype producing fights there are out there for AJ. A Ruiz III bout in Mexico city would do wonders but also carry enormous risk.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 16:34
by gilgamesh
It's not a bad thing really if they're actually able to get Fury vs Joshua done before years end. Or hell even Wilder vs Joshua if something unexpected should happen.

It'll probably be a little more competitive than the 2nd bout, but only because Fury will be a little more careful with a big megafight looming on the horizon.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 17:30
by The Gratest
If Wilder gets the weight of his ring walk costume right then hell, anything can happen!


Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 18:26
by Monzon83
If these 2 keep fighting each other it's not impossible that Wilder eventually lands one of those hail mary right hands and gets a KO. He nearly did in the first fight, which people forget.

Then what? We get Wilder-Fury part 4.

I would not be surprised if that happens.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 20:50
by Jeff_lacy_ko
maverick23 wrote: 18 May 2021, 14:15
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 11:10 No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank
I think it depends on whether Fury or Wilder have any guarantees in their deals. Given by most accounts their last fight lost money for the networks I would have thought they’d just spend less on promotion, agree smaller guarantees for the fighters and take something like 500k buys.
The networks pay for the tv advertising and they surely made money.

Top rank and haymon lost money because of ridiculous guarantees. I would assume a 3rd fight has guranteed money too - let me check the court filings

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 18 May 2021, 21:54
by margaret thatcher
Monzon83 wrote: 18 May 2021, 18:26 If these 2 keep fighting each other it's not impossible that Wilder eventually lands one of those hail mary right hands and gets a KO. He nearly did in the first fight, which people forget.

Then what? We get Wilder-Fury part 4.

I would not be surprised if that happens.
lol, wilder-fury 4, with a rematch clause for the loser :lol:

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 19 May 2021, 02:23
by DrDuke
Probably team Wilder is just b!tching for the bigger step aside check.

Re: Fury-Wilder III (24th July, Las Vegas)

Posted: 19 May 2021, 02:37
by maverick23
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 20:50
maverick23 wrote: 18 May 2021, 14:15
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 18 May 2021, 11:10 No way
This is going to lose a lot of money for al and top rank
I think it depends on whether Fury or Wilder have any guarantees in their deals. Given by most accounts their last fight lost money for the networks I would have thought they’d just spend less on promotion, agree smaller guarantees for the fighters and take something like 500k buys.
The networks pay for the tv advertising and they surely made money.

Top rank and haymon lost money because of ridiculous guarantees. I would assume a 3rd fight has guranteed money too - let me check the court filings
The networks dedicated loads of ad space for pushing the fight. In the end the money they would have received from the fight would have been less than they would have received if they’d just sold the airtime to normal advertisers.

I’d be surprised if Bob/Al lost money but who knows. May explain why they were so against staging the fight with minimal fans.