BoxRec

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 14:04**

Very interesting to see Barry Hearn and his wife are both in the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile island black book. Which means they have to be compromised in some way. We can only speculate why they are associated with the world's most hated pedophile. Did he have to sell his soul to become a part of the elite group who control tv and sports? If he was funded by big money which helped pave the way for him and his son to become a top promoter, do the Hearns owe favors to certain elites? Is it possible the AJ alleged dive vs Ruiz was one of those favors.

Can anyone sufficiently explain why on earth Barry Hearn is listed in Jeffrey Epstein's black book along with Simon LeBon, Phil Collins, Naomi Campbell. Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Vera Wang, etc.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... k-redacted

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 14:28**

Epstein, I watched a documentary on him. A complete c*nt. Although, just because he knew Hearn, it doesn’t really mean anything. They were both in business after all.

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 14:48**

Everybody knew what esptein was up to, pimping underage girls and also satanic sacrifies at the island under the temple. Hearn has some explaining to do.

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 15:30**

Barry Hearn eats babies

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 15:42**

Can we have this moved to OT please?
And Mr Numbers put on some sort of tether, his conspiracy crap is off the hook.

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 16:19**

This is old news.

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 16:23**

Depends on the black book. is it his standard adress book, or is it his "boys to call for a bender when i get a new batch of kids" book.

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 19:12**

Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑23 Aug 2021, 16:19 This is old news.

Gee that’s ok then

Posted: **23 Aug 2021, 20:30**

555678 wrote: ↑23 Aug 2021, 14:04 Very interesting to see Barry Hearn and his wife are both in the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile island black book. Which means they have to be compromised in some way. We can only speculate why they are associated with the world's most hated pedophile. Did he have to sell his soul to become a part of the elite group who control tv and sports? If he was funded by big money which helped pave the way for him and his son to become a top promoter, do the Hearns owe favors to certain elites? Is it possible the AJ alleged dive vs Ruiz was one of those favors.

Can anyone sufficiently explain why on earth Barry Hearn is listed in Jeffrey Epstein's black book along with Simon LeBon, Phil Collins, Naomi Campbell. Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, Vera Wang, etc.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... k-redacted

My mobile phone contains a list of contacts. Hundreds of names I’ve accumulated due to my employment.

If I commit a crime, does that automatically mean they’re all guilty by association?

Sometimes a phonebook is only a phonebook.

That’s a sufficient explanation.

If you disagree, you need to specifically state your accusations of the Hearn family.

Tread carefully now, you’re potentially doing something that goes well beyond the scope of trolling or freedom of speech.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 07:56**

JamesPhilips wrote: ↑23 Aug 2021, 19:12
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑23 Aug 2021, 16:19 This is old news.
Gee that’s ok then

Barry’s openly spoken about it in the past. He said he and his wife met him at a function and didn’t see or speak to him again after that.

Epstein probably requested/kept their details as there may have been a business opportunity. Matchroom turnover the best part of 1/4 billion £ per year and it’s a family business so he may be a contact worth having for a financier/media guy to have.

It’s not like there were 50 people in the book, there were the best part of 2,000 from memory including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, their family members, Alec Baldwin, Ralph Fiennes, Mick Jagger, various Secretaries of State, Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch and loads of others.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 08:08**

Charles Lynton.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 11:51**

Of course if he was a client of epstein he is going to deny it and downplay the friendship like prince andrew tried to do but there was a lot of incriminating evidence and testimony against prince andy.

so we don't really know if hearn was a casual acquaintance or a keen client. but the fact is he's in that book and that is a damned red flag. can anyone say what services hearn offered epstein to make him include his contact info in his rolodex?

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 11:56**

see the Stanley Kubrick film Eyes Wide Shut, Kubrick exposed the secret pedo society and was murdered because of it. everyone associated with epstein should be investigated. but as we know, the "investigators" are all compromised.

Hearn's lame explanation sounds exactly as lame and self serving as Prince Andrew's. If he's really completely innocent he needs to say and show more.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 12:02**

maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 07:56
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑23 Aug 2021, 19:12
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑23 Aug 2021, 16:19 This is old news.
Gee that’s ok then
Barry’s openly spoken about it in the past. He said he and his wife met him at a function and didn’t see or speak to him again after that.

Epstein probably requested/kept their details as there may have been a business opportunity. Matchroom turnover the best part of 1/4 billion £ per year and it’s a family business so he may be a contact worth having for a financier/media guy to have.

It’s not like there were 50 people in the book, there were the best part of 2,000 from memory including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, their family members, Alec Baldwin, Ralph Fiennes, Mick Jagger, various Secretaries of State, Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch and loads of others.

Lol imagine believing that. Epstein had like 5 numbers or more including the missus. That’s not just a ‘can I take your mobile mate?” And like Hearn would just give his number (or indeed 5) out like that to a random man he just encountered with no discernible business affiliation. Liar. Hearn is a senior mason too

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 13:08**

JamesPhilips wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 12:02
maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 07:56
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑23 Aug 2021, 19:12

Gee that’s ok then
Barry’s openly spoken about it in the past. He said he and his wife met him at a function and didn’t see or speak to him again after that.

Epstein probably requested/kept their details as there may have been a business opportunity. Matchroom turnover the best part of 1/4 billion £ per year and it’s a family business so he may be a contact worth having for a financier/media guy to have.

It’s not like there were 50 people in the book, there were the best part of 2,000 from memory including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, their family members, Alec Baldwin, Ralph Fiennes, Mick Jagger, various Secretaries of State, Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch and loads of others.
Lol imagine believing that. Epstein had like 5 numbers or more including the missus. That’s not just a ‘can I take your mobile mate?” And like Hearn would just give his number (or indeed 5) out like that to a random man he just encountered with no discernible business affiliation. Liar. Hearn is a senior mason too

Hearn said he didn’t give him his number(s). He said Epstein must have got the details from someone/somewhere else.

From a business point of view Epstein would have been a good contact to have and given his background would have appeared to have good contacts.

Who’s the liar? Do you really think Barry Hearn and his wife were involved with what he was convicted of? What about the other 1,500 or so people listed?

Also I’m not sure what being a mason has to do it with it. Again that would have likely been something to join to boost contacts. I’ve worked with people in the past who’ve been Masons and they all said that’s it helped with things.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 14:37**

maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 13:08
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 12:02
maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 07:56

Barry’s openly spoken about it in the past. He said he and his wife met him at a function and didn’t see or speak to him again after that.

Epstein probably requested/kept their details as there may have been a business opportunity. Matchroom turnover the best part of 1/4 billion £ per year and it’s a family business so he may be a contact worth having for a financier/media guy to have.

It’s not like there were 50 people in the book, there were the best part of 2,000 from memory including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, their family members, Alec Baldwin, Ralph Fiennes, Mick Jagger, various Secretaries of State, Tony Blair, Rupert Murdoch and loads of others.
Lol imagine believing that. Epstein had like 5 numbers or more including the missus. That’s not just a ‘can I take your mobile mate?” And like Hearn would just give his number (or indeed 5) out like that to a random man he just encountered with no discernible business affiliation. Liar. Hearn is a senior mason too
Hearn said he didn’t give him his number(s). He said Epstein must have got the details from someone/somewhere else.

From a business point of view Epstein would have been a good contact to have and given his background would have appeared to have good contacts.

Who’s the liar? Do you really think Barry Hearn and his wife were involved with what he was convicted of? What about the other 1,500 or so people listed?

Also I’m not sure what being a mason has to do it with it. Again that would have likely been something to join to boost contacts. I’ve worked with people in the past who’ve been Masons and they all said that’s it helped with things.

With all respect, myself, and millions of people around the world, who have no contact with Epstein or the elite, knew exactly what Epstein was, what he was doing, years before he was arrested. So it's not reasonable to suggest that Hearn and anyone rich, or anyone who mixes in those circles didn't know.

It's like suggesting that the royal family, Bruno, Keith Starmer, the BBC etc had no idea what Savile was up to.... when many people on the street, pre Internet as well knew what he was up to. Hearn's excuse is pathetic- for him to suggest Epstein deliberately tracked down 5 or more personal numbers for a man who is of little importance financially or with regard to power, esp compared to the big shots Epstein hung with is ludicrous..... almost as ludicrous as suggesting a dodgy businessmen in a dodgy business wouldn't lie and yo believe his pathetic story

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 15:04**

JamesPhilips wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 14:37
maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 13:08
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 12:02

Lol imagine believing that. Epstein had like 5 numbers or more including the missus. That’s not just a ‘can I take your mobile mate?” And like Hearn would just give his number (or indeed 5) out like that to a random man he just encountered with no discernible business affiliation. Liar. Hearn is a senior mason too
Hearn said he didn’t give him his number(s). He said Epstein must have got the details from someone/somewhere else.

From a business point of view Epstein would have been a good contact to have and given his background would have appeared to have good contacts.

Who’s the liar? Do you really think Barry Hearn and his wife were involved with what he was convicted of? What about the other 1,500 or so people listed?

Also I’m not sure what being a mason has to do it with it. Again that would have likely been something to join to boost contacts. I’ve worked with people in the past who’ve been Masons and they all said that’s it helped with things.
With all respect, myself, and millions of people around the world, who have no contact with Epstein or the elite, knew exactly what Epstein was, what he was doing, years before he was arrested. So it's not reasonable to suggest that Hearn and anyone rich, or anyone who mixes in those circles didn't know.

It's like suggesting that the royal family, Bruno, Keith Starmer, the BBC etc had no idea what Savile was up to.... when many people on the street, pre Internet as well knew what he was up to. Hearn's excuse is pathetic- for him to suggest Epstein deliberately tracked down 5 or more personal numbers for a man who is of little importance financially or with regard to power, esp compared to the big shots Epstein hung with is ludicrous..... almost as ludicrous as suggesting a dodgy businessmen in a dodgy business wouldn't lie and yo believe his pathetic story

Hearn may well have heard the rumours but if someone introduces you and your wife at function you’re highly unlikely to call him out on it are you?

Where are you getting the 5 numbers from? Is it the amount of book that was blacked out?

I’ll ask again, do you really think Barry Hearn and his wife were involved with child sex offences? What about the other 1,500 listed?

Also why is Barry Hearn a dodgy businessman?

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 15:24**

I’ve just checked - it’s 3 phone numbers. All seemingly landlines. One’s the office number, one’s the fax and the third is the home number.

It doesn’t make me think secret abuse club but you seemingly know more- what were the other phone numbers you were referring to when you said 5 or more personal numbers?

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 17:18**

maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 15:24 I’ve just checked - it’s 3 phone numbers. All seemingly landlines. One’s the office number, one’s the fax and the third is the home number.

It doesn’t make me think secret abuse club but you seemingly know more- what were the other phone numbers you were referring to when you said 5 or more personal numbers?

Yes it was 3. And an address. But it's not unworthy of notice, and of course Hearn is going to deny everything and palm it off. As if he's gonna admit anything vaguely incriminating.
I have no idea what the relationship was or what happened. There was a weird Martin Bakole tweet as well at the time. And Hearn conveniently had a 'heart attack' which some have claimed was fake when it all came out. Who knows. No point in me or anyone speculating.....BUT the whole thing is dodgy, and dangerous... let's stick to boxing. The whole thing gives me the creeps. Nothing more to add.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 17:48**

I think we can all agree to be at the point where we don’t really know anything, but wouldent let Barry babysit our kids.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 17:50**

gregregegg wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 17:48 I think we can all agree to be at the point where we don’t really know anything, but wouldent let Barry babysit our kids.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 17:55**

JamesPhilips wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 17:18
maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 15:24 I’ve just checked - it’s 3 phone numbers. All seemingly landlines. One’s the office number, one’s the fax and the third is the home number.

It doesn’t make me think secret abuse club but you seemingly know more- what were the other phone numbers you were referring to when you said 5 or more personal numbers?
Yes it was 3. And an address. But it's not unworthy of notice, and of course Hearn is going to deny everything and palm it off. As if he's gonna admit anything vaguely incriminating.
I have no idea what the relationship was or what happened. There was a weird Martin Bakole tweet as well at the time. And Hearn conveniently had a 'heart attack' which some have claimed was fake when it all came out. Who knows. No point in me or anyone speculating.....BUT the whole thing is dodgy, and dangerous... let's stick to boxing. The whole thing gives me the creeps. Nothing more to add.

Ok. The final things I’ll say are the bits of info that were in the book on Hearn were reasonably easily accessible.

The black book details came out in July 2019. Barry had his second heart attack in April 2020 so 9 months after. I’m not sure there’s anything convenient about that.

Ive no idea what the Bakole tweet has anything to do with this. He stupidly put a link/video on Twitter condemning what was happening in the video but given what was on the video he shouldn’t have shared it. This was also 9 months after the black book came out.

You say there’s no point in speculating but that’s what you’re doing.

Anyway let’s get back to boxing.

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 18:11**

maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 17:55
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 17:18
maverick23 wrote: ↑24 Aug 2021, 15:24 I’ve just checked - it’s 3 phone numbers. All seemingly landlines. One’s the office number, one’s the fax and the third is the home number.

It doesn’t make me think secret abuse club but you seemingly know more- what were the other phone numbers you were referring to when you said 5 or more personal numbers?
Yes it was 3. And an address. But it's not unworthy of notice, and of course Hearn is going to deny everything and palm it off. As if he's gonna admit anything vaguely incriminating.
I have no idea what the relationship was or what happened. There was a weird Martin Bakole tweet as well at the time. And Hearn conveniently had a 'heart attack' which some have claimed was fake when it all came out. Who knows. No point in me or anyone speculating.....BUT the whole thing is dodgy, and dangerous... let's stick to boxing. The whole thing gives me the creeps. Nothing more to add.
Ok. The final things I’ll say are the bits of info that were in the book on Hearn were reasonably easily accessible.

The black book details came out in July 2019. Barry had his second heart attack in April 2020 so 9 months after. I’m not sure there’s anything convenient about that.

Ive no idea what the Bakole tweet has anything to do with this. He stupidly put a link/video on Twitter condemning what was happening in the video but given what was on the video he shouldn’t have shared it. This was also 9 months after the black book came out.

You say there’s no point in speculating but that’s what you’re doing.

Anyway let’s get back to boxing.

Agreed. Right so who would win in a boxing match? Prime Epstein or Prime Barry Hearn?

Posted: **24 Aug 2021, 19:14**

So the Mossad honeytrap Jefrey Epstein had something to do with Barry Hearn. Yay who gives a fck?

It's such a bullshit world. The day that Jeffrey Epstein allegedly killed himself I heard a young feminist cheer in victory that he had killed himself and then we heard the media try to affiliate Epstein with Trump. Everyone knows that Epstein didn't kill himself, is he dead is a better question, probably yes but I never personally inspected any corpse of his so I'll have my doubts and the mainstream media can go fck itself.

BoxRec

Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book

Re: Barry Hearn is in the Jeffrey Epstein Island black book