Page 1 of 1

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 03:32
by gregregegg
Feel like iv forgotten how to read... Can you explain what your trying to say more?

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 05:38
by Lackeos
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:11 am

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 05:44
by DrDuke
Lackeos wrote: 21 Nov 2021, 05:38 Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:11 am
A definition of a slow starter.

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 16 Aug 2022, 04:04
by Lenny Cravats
Bingo Crook wrote: 15 Aug 2022, 23:18 USYK 1ST
WILDER 2ND
JOSHUA 3rd
RUIZ 4.
Frank Sanchez, Joseph Parker.. any number of Boxers could fill the No-4 spot now. Michael Hunter's name I can add easily.
Boxings three (3) "sandtraps" present hour. 1) IBO 2) the "duel tri." 3) aa "Caution" on all former "duel tri" male and female. bb Fury nix it the language par the datelines on his first Lineal rein. This WILL pop up "in context."
IBO "problem" is at the world level alone. It effects the Male league only a.t.t. [I myself "CAN NOT CALL IT" on the Female side. Thus... it "remains ungoverned"/4 the moment].
Note: ALL active duel-tri players male as well as female are WORLD WIDE BANNED by the Board of the UWBCAFO-I.

What happened with that bus in the end, Bill?

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 16 Aug 2022, 04:10
by Counter-puncher
:lol: :TU:

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 29 Jan 2023, 02:28
by gilgamesh
This has gotta be the most unclear style of posting I've ever come across.

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 29 Jan 2023, 10:47
by computerrank
Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 29 Jan 2023, 13:03
by gilgamesh
computerrank wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 10:47 Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:
It might be A, but it missed the I :lol:

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 30 Jan 2023, 04:42
by Finkel
In that case may I just say "Welcome!" to our new AI overlords.

I thought your posting style was very succinct and to the point. Please ignore these infidels; they know not what they say.

When the cullings begin (for our own good I'm sure), please remember you are fully accepted by the boxing fraternity.
:bow:

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 30 Jan 2023, 16:06
by golden_labrador
computerrank wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 10:47 Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:
:clap: I believed you

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 18 Mar 2023, 11:22
by chinarich
Posts written in most confusing way, they are...

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 18 Mar 2023, 18:59
by tiny_acres
gilgamesh wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 13:03
computerrank wrote: 29 Jan 2023, 10:47 Not at all, it's AI ... :TU:
It might be A, but it missed the I :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 18 Mar 2023, 19:25
by JCS
Why does this guy remind me of an old poster... who was it? Didn't he constantly ramble on about suing someone?

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 19 Mar 2023, 18:56
by Bandog
Need to delete this whole idiotic thread.

Re: BoxRec NEEDS to conform in the area of:

Posted: 20 Mar 2023, 06:07
by funso banjo baby
My head hurts