Page 1 of 1

Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Posted: 11 Mar 2022, 04:48
by 867393
Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Iron Mike Tyson at his peak was an apex predator, top of the food chain. Power and movement a rhythm of amazing wizardry Tyson at his peak could dodge any punch and explode at will. He could knockout anyone with one shot. Jake Paul has knocked out every man he's faced. 5-0 with 4 KO's Paul is on top of todays' boxing world. Not as a champion but he's still popular. He's proven he has power.

Paul is nothing compared to peak Tyson he's just getting started. 30 year's in age difference Paul is 25 and Tyson is 55.

https://youtu.be/a1f3wKlvWSM

In a mythical battle I'm sure most would say Tyson would rip Paul apart, but in a boxing match today who would take it Mike Tyson or Jake Paul?

Re: Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Posted: 12 Mar 2022, 01:20
by Cutman Scabbers
Well, I'm pretty sure George Foreman at age 50 would have handled Jake Paul.

Mike Tyson at 55?

I guess it's hard to bet on any 55 year old man against a 25 year old, even if both are in shape.

Re: Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Posted: 12 Mar 2022, 02:57
by HomicideHenry
I think George Foreman right now could kick Jake Paul's butt :lol: I can't take this discussion seriously because for the most part I don't believe most of Paul's fights have been on the level anyways.

Re: Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Posted: 12 Mar 2022, 08:37
by Cutman Scabbers
HomicideHenry wrote: 12 Mar 2022, 02:57 I think George Foreman right now could kick Jake Paul's butt :lol: I can't take this discussion seriously because for the most part I don't believe most of Paul's fights have been on the level anyways.
I was thinking the same thing about Foreman. When you say "not on the level," could you elaborate?

Maybe this is why there haven't been so many responses to this post.

Re: Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Posted: 12 Mar 2022, 10:47
by HomicideHenry
Cutman Scabbers wrote: 12 Mar 2022, 08:37
HomicideHenry wrote: 12 Mar 2022, 02:57 I think George Foreman right now could kick Jake Paul's butt :lol: I can't take this discussion seriously because for the most part I don't believe most of Paul's fights have been on the level anyways.
I was thinking the same thing about Foreman. When you say "not on the level," could you elaborate?

Maybe this is why there haven't been so many responses to this post.
Even if his fights were legitimate they are basically low-level journeyman caliber wins at best. That being said, I do think that some of his wins if not all of his wins have an asterisk next to it either people losing purposely to the man or they did not go full out on the man. Not to mention the fact that he has refused time and again to undergo testing for certain drugs that enhance performance.

Re: Mike Tyson vs Jake Paul

Posted: 14 Mar 2022, 12:05
by emallini
Pass away