I think the Motor City Cobra beats McCallum, but the Hitman could get overzealous, tire and get stopped late.
Hearns 116-112 for me.
I'm sure you've seen it tiny, but just incase.....
Image is not appearing
Oops.
Look pretty evenly matched for a sparring session. But sparring is not an actual fight.
Definitely a dream match up
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 26 Nov 2022, 19:30
by goose 5
I'd take Robinson, Gavilan, Griffith and Luis Rodriguez to beat Hearns at 154. I can't help but suspect that guys I didn't see like Jose Basora, Holman Williams and Charley Burley beat him as well.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 26 Nov 2022, 19:41
by keithmoonhangover
goose 5 wrote: ↑26 Nov 2022, 19:30
I'd take Robinson, Gavilan, Griffith and Luis Rodriguez to beat Hearns at 154. I can't help but suspect that guys I didn't see like Jose Basora, Holman Williams and Charley Burley beat him as well.
Did they all fight at 154?
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 26 Nov 2022, 19:42
by Seamus
I'd take SRR by stoppage, too strong and durable, SRL would be 50/50.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 10:27
by Nile4000
Possibly McCallum. Ray is a bit of an unknown,Kalule gave him a bit of a good fight.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 10:37
by littlepug
Leonard v Hearns at 154 would have been interesting.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 13:43
by Syntax Error
Canelo Alvarez & Mike McCallum.
I feel those guys would have been able to withstand Hearns's guided missile Right hand & pressure him into late rounds defeat.
Canelo might have been able to Hagler him if he went balls out, but that's not his style.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 15:34
by goose 5
The guys I mentioned all beat middleweights when they were not much over welterweight. of course, there was no junior middleweight division years ago.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 15:48
by keithmoonhangover
goose 5 wrote: ↑27 Nov 2022, 15:34
The guys I mentioned all beat middleweights when they were not much over welterweight. of course, there was no junior middleweight division years ago.
My original question was about people that fought at 154. Matters not though. All opinions welcome.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 16:27
by Syntax Error
littlepug wrote: ↑27 Nov 2022, 10:37
Leonard v Hearns at 154 would have been interesting.
Indeed.
Leonard and Hearns would always have had intruiging fights providing both were still 'living'.
Two evenly matched ATGs with phenomenal skillsets who always brought the best out of each other.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 17:13
by nobleart1978
Hearns pretty unstoppable at light middle especially during 1982 to 86 timeframe
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 19:02
by Wee Tommy
keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑26 Nov 2022, 12:52
Does anyone who fought at 154 beat him?
McCallum, Ray Leonard, Emile Griffith and possibly Julian Jackson. If there is one champion I’d bet on Hearns to beat handily it’s Canelo. Absolutely no chance.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 20:00
by elmersalsa
nobleart1978 wrote: ↑27 Nov 2022, 17:13
Hearns pretty unstoppable at light middle especially during 1982 to 86 timeframe
almost invincible at 154lbs. That was clearly his best weight.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 20:21
by bollocks
Never liked the way Hearns swung his left arm side to side whilst it was hanging around at hip height. He was lucky that very few were able to take advantage of it. I'd say McCallum beats Hearns at 154lbs, 7 out of 10
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 27 Nov 2022, 21:09
by goose 5
I think Mugabi, pre-Hagler, gives him all he wants and is a very live dog to catch Hearns and take him out. But, I wouldn't bet on it.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 28 Nov 2022, 11:18
by Ambling Alp II
Robinson would be another that would have had a good chance.
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 28 Nov 2022, 14:32
by elmersalsa
bollocks wrote: ↑27 Nov 2022, 20:21
Never liked the way Hearns swung his left arm side to side whilst it was hanging around at hip height. He was lucky that very few were able to take advantage of it. I'd say McCallum beats Hearns at 154lbs, 7 out of 10
I don't disagree one bit with you. The great Mike McCallum was a very complete fighter.
bollocks wrote: ↑27 Nov 2022, 20:21
Never liked the way Hearns swung his left arm side to side whilst it was hanging around at hip height. He was lucky that very few were able to take advantage of it. I'd say McCallum beats Hearns at 154lbs, 7 out of 10
I don't disagree one bit with you. The great Mike McCallum was a very complete fighter.
Once read that he was considered a head case, in that he was difficult to deal with outside the ring
Re: Hearns @ 154
Posted: 28 Nov 2022, 16:59
by Syntax Error
bollocks wrote: ↑27 Nov 2022, 20:21
Never liked the way Hearns swung his left arm side to side whilst it was hanging around at hip height. He was lucky that very few were able to take advantage of it. I'd say McCallum beats Hearns at 154lbs, 7 out of 10
I'm inclined to agree with you.
If Tommy boxed, I think he could have won, but Hearns just couldn't resist going for it and that would have been his undoing against someone like McCallum.
Mike had a great chin to go with his technical ability.
Someone with a granite chin and stamina who can put Hearns under pressure beats him.
Fortunately for Tommy, fighters with those attributes almost always are ATGs and there aren't too many of them to choose from, particularly in the relatively unfashionable 154 lb division.