Page 1 of 1
Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 12:13
by Ruthless-RKO
I read this fight is being confirmed.
Friday night on Channel 5..
We got a card already on 25th, so this will be good. 2 nights of boxing.
Card will be taking place in Bolton.5
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 12:47
by maverick23
Really good fight. I quite fancy Bolotniks.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 13:37
by margaret thatcher
ya good one
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 13:49
by THEBUTCH
Lyndon Arthur...Great !!!
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 14:07
by margaret thatcher
ricky bolotiks is a warrior though , maybe he can bring out the battle in lyndy
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 18:50
by gregregegg
Amazed how 1 sided this pole is. I’m backing Lyndon by points if he can trust his jab.
Edit: wait fuk all have voted yet,. So hardly conclusive…
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023 - Can you guess why?
Posted: 31 Jan 2023, 19:35
by quickeyg
That day will be great.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023, 04:56
by a force
I think the first Yarde fight flattered Arthur & I don’t think he’s anything better than British level & would expect Bolotniks to win this especially with a decent amount of time to prepare.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023, 11:47
by Manchester Hitman
I’m going for Bolotniks - good fight
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 01 Feb 2023, 13:24
by jameswilson
10 rounds or 12 rounds?
Some of the body shots Bolotniks sunk into Buatsi would have had a lot of light heavyweights over.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 02 Feb 2023, 08:55
by keithmoonhangover
Is it just me, or do Pat Barrett trained boxers not throw enough punches?
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 02 Feb 2023, 12:06
by skanksta
keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 08:55
Is it just me, or do Pat Barrett trained boxers not throw enough punches?
Zelfa does doesn't he ?
I think it's just Arthur - he's big at the weight and not really a duracell bunny type. His style basically.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 02 Feb 2023, 12:16
by keithmoonhangover
skanksta wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 12:06
keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 08:55
Is it just me, or do Pat Barrett trained boxers not throw enough punches?
Zelfa does doesn't he ?
I think it's just Arthur - he's big at the weight and not really a duracell bunny type. His style basically.
I never thought Zelfa throws enoug.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 02 Feb 2023, 13:58
by jameswilson
This is a great fight for main event free to air tv let’s be frank about it.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 06 Feb 2023, 05:10
by Ruthless-RKO
jameswilson wrote: ↑02 Feb 2023, 13:58
This is a great fight for main event free to air tv let’s be frank about it.
Hopefully we get another decent scrap on the undercard.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 06 Feb 2023, 06:48
by olij999
Decent quality fight. Well done C5.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - 24 March 2023
Posted: 06 Feb 2023, 15:47
by mickey1975
He was on about a South American opponent in an interview I saw.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 09 Feb 2023, 07:08
by Ruthless-RKO
Shame.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 09 Feb 2023, 12:16
by margaret thatcher
rich vs rick is good too though
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 09 Feb 2023, 15:29
by olij999
"Not approved"? By whom? Can't be a quality issue, given his record, so surely can't be the sanctioning body. Is it an injury (although Boxrec lists Bolotnik fighting on 1 April against Craig Richards)? Maybe he's failed a check weigh, if they are done for IBO titles? Anybody know why it is off?
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 09 Feb 2023, 16:48
by Ruthless-RKO
olij999 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 15:29
"Not approved"? By whom? Can't be a quality issue, given his record, so surely can't be the sanctioning body. Is it an injury (although Boxrec lists Bolotnik fighting on 1 April against Craig Richards)? Maybe he's failed a check weigh, if they are done for IBO titles? Anybody know why it is off?
Bolotniks is now fighting Richards on AJ card.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 10 Feb 2023, 06:22
by olij999
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:48
olij999 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 15:29
"Not approved"? By whom? Can't be a quality issue, given his record, so surely can't be the sanctioning body. Is it an injury (although Boxrec lists Bolotnik fighting on 1 April against Craig Richards)? Maybe he's failed a check weigh, if they are done for IBO titles? Anybody know why it is off?
Bolotniks is now fighting Richards on AJ card.
I get that. But my point was about the Everythingboxing tweet which said the fight was "not approved". That's a bit different from him deciding to fight someone else a week later, which is why I was wondering what it meant.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 10 Feb 2023, 06:30
by maverick23
olij999 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2023, 06:22
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:48
olij999 wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 15:29
"Not approved"? By whom? Can't be a quality issue, given his record, so surely can't be the sanctioning body. Is it an injury (although Boxrec lists Bolotnik fighting on 1 April against Craig Richards)? Maybe he's failed a check weigh, if they are done for IBO titles? Anybody know why it is off?
Bolotniks is now fighting Richards on AJ card.
I get that. But my point was about the Everythingboxing tweet which said the fight was "not approved". That's a bit different from him deciding to fight someone else a week later, which is why I was wondering what it meant.
Amazingly I think the IBO have a rule whereby someone has to be in their top 30 or something to challenge for their title and Bolotniks wasn’t in there so wasn’t approved.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 10 Feb 2023, 06:33
by Ruthless-RKO
maverick23 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2023, 06:30
olij999 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2023, 06:22
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:48
Bolotniks is now fighting Richards on AJ card.
I get that. But my point was about the Everythingboxing tweet which said the fight was "not approved". That's a bit different from him deciding to fight someone else a week later, which is why I was wondering what it meant.
Amazingly I think the IBO have a rule whereby someone has to be in their top 30 or something to challenge for their title and Bolotniks wasn’t in there so wasn’t approved.
Yeh, you'd think that IBO would want their 3% commission and put him in there.
Re: Lyndon Arthur vs. Richard Bolotnik | CH5 - OFF
Posted: 10 Feb 2023, 06:37
by olij999
maverick23 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2023, 06:30
olij999 wrote: ↑10 Feb 2023, 06:22
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑09 Feb 2023, 16:48
Bolotniks is now fighting Richards on AJ card.
I get that. But my point was about the Everythingboxing tweet which said the fight was "not approved". That's a bit different from him deciding to fight someone else a week later, which is why I was wondering what it meant.
Amazingly I think the IBO have a rule whereby someone has to be in their top 30 or something to challenge for their title and Bolotniks wasn’t in there so wasn’t approved.
Thank you - interesting to hear that. Rare days indeed when a sanctioning body rejects a pretty good challenger.