Page 1 of 1
margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 06 May 2023, 09:49
by Sweet Dick Willie
I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!

Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 06 May 2023, 09:53
by Sweet Dick Willie
Just kidding, 119-110 (or 119-109) Bivol... But I could see how I scored some of the early rounds back then with my tired, tipsy, dreary Canelo glasses without realising most of the mexicans punches clearly landing on Bivol's shoulders.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 06 May 2023, 15:57
by KiwiRider
You'll get over it.
Upsets can catch us out.
I had Bivol taking it by 3, it was a superb performance. It was one of those fights where one guy is slowly slipping back in points, but you kinda expect him to get back into it with his power.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 06 May 2023, 16:03
by wrighty
Off topic but I had bjs vs canelo a lot closer than what the judges had it. Granted Bjs still lost but they said he was pretty much losing everything. I thought he was nicking a few rounds and was looking sharp. It just made me think "what's the point if judges will just do that". Yep I've had a bevvy
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 06 May 2023, 17:46
by margaret thatcher
a much better score this time my man, i think i had it 9-3 or 10-2 bivol. a few early rounds and the 9th could've gone to nelo
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 06 May 2023, 18:24
by wrighty
margaret thatcher wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 17:46
a much better score this time my man, i think i had it 9-3 or 10-2 bivol. a few early rounds and the 9th could've gone to nelo
How would it play out at 168?
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 06 May 2023, 18:26
by margaret thatcher
good question, bivol never strikes me as being a big light heavy and he seems very confident about his abilities at 168. i think he'd still get the better of canelo, but the issue of getting a fair shake is always there. based on cards from the first fight, canelo would basically just need to do a tiny bit better
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 08 May 2023, 16:50
by handsofstone
The weight dispute for the rematch seems a rare problem where both Bivol and Canelo are perceived to be pushing for the harder option , Canelo obviously wants to prove he doesn't need to drag Bivol down to beat him and Bivol obviously wants to become undisputed at Super Middle and not have to drag Canelo up from his natural weight class to beat him him again, I've always loved the idea of Bivol at 168, he's always been a small Light Heavy
It shouldn't be hard to solve, Bivol deserves to have to have the ultimate say and hope he does because this will be a better fight at 168 imo
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 08 May 2023, 17:06
by wrighty
A fair assessment by both. I'm shocked Ryder had the success he did, but I think a lot of that is he has improved after the Blackwell stoppage!
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 09 May 2023, 06:20
by JamesPhilips
wrighty wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 17:06
A fair assessment by both. I'm shocked Ryder had the success he did, but I think a lot of that is he has improved after the Blackwell stoppage!
Yes. It’s the egg diet
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 09 May 2023, 18:31
by wrighty
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 06:20
wrighty wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 17:06
A fair assessment by both. I'm shocked Ryder had the success he did, but I think a lot of that is he has improved after the Blackwell stoppage!
Yes. It’s the egg diet
Has he got the same chef as Benn?
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 10 May 2023, 09:15
by JamesPhilips
wrighty wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 18:31
JamesPhilips wrote: ↑09 May 2023, 06:20
wrighty wrote: ↑08 May 2023, 17:06
A fair assessment by both. I'm shocked Ryder had the success he did, but I think a lot of that is he has improved after the Blackwell stoppage!
Yes. It’s the egg diet
Has he got the same chef as Benn?
They’re good friends apparently
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 10 May 2023, 11:53
by cormack
JackSprocket wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 09:49
I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!
I take it you were either pissed up or on the wacky backy

Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 10 May 2023, 22:12
by oogiebe
stevec@france wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 11:53
JackSprocket wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 09:49
I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!
I take it you were either pissed up or on the wacky backy
Read his second post.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 11 May 2023, 09:56
by cormack
oogiebe wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 22:12
stevec@france wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 11:53
JackSprocket wrote: ↑06 May 2023, 09:49
I finally rewatched Canelo-Bivol!
...and still 115-114 - but this time for Canelo!
I take it you were either pissed up or on the wacky backy
Read his second post.
dont be clever !
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 11 May 2023, 15:16
by Dioufy
Cannot believe MagThatch getting his own thread - he’s a slag.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 11 May 2023, 15:36
by oogiebe
stevec@france wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 09:56
oogiebe wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 22:12
stevec@france wrote: ↑10 May 2023, 11:53
I take it you were either pissed up or on the wacky backy
Read his second post.
dont be clever !

Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 12 May 2023, 16:20
by Sweet Dick Willie
Dioufy wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 15:16
Cannot believe MagThatch getting his own thread - he’s a slag.
Well of course, he's my boy!
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 12 May 2023, 19:42
by Frostieballs
Every time I see this thread title I think it’s going to be about the miners.
Re: margaret thatcher!!!
Posted: 12 May 2023, 19:45
by margaret thatcher
Dioufy wrote: ↑11 May 2023, 15:16
Cannot believe MagThatch getting his own thread - he’s a slag.
you know you love me
