Page 1 of 1
Who wins. Kermit Cintron v Michael Jennings
Posted: 14 Mar 2005, 09:25
by REAL_DEAL
who knows it could happen, looking at the WBO rankings
Position
Name
Country
Champion: ANTONIO MARGARITO (MEX)
INTERIM CHAMPION KERMIT CINTRON (PR)
1. Michael JenningsGB
2. Walter Dario Matthysee (Latino)ARG
3. Frederic Klose (EBU) FRA
4. Joshua Clottey GHA
5. Newton Villareal COL
6. Sebastian Lujan ARG
7. Cory Spinks USA
8. Oktay Urkal GER
9. Michael Trabant GER
10. David Barnes GB
11. Chris Smith USA
12. Carlos Quintana PR
13. Jose Luis Cruz MEX
14. Manuel Gomez MEX
15. Alexis Division DR
Rankings are subject to changes.
Posted: 14 Mar 2005, 09:27
by Kilburn
Would be a tall order for Jennings. Cintron is a quality operator, the fight with Margarito is a very interesting clash.
Would be even better if we actually got to see it.
Posted: 14 Mar 2005, 09:36
by stujones
I think Crinton would be a bit too much for Michael at this stage, but hey if Margarito beats Crinton and then moves up - it could be Jennings vs Matthyse for the vacant title.
Good find, Real Deal. Very interesting those.
Posted: 14 Mar 2005, 09:39
by MightyWarrior
Good to see the WBO are still coming out with the daftest ratings around.
WBO No#1 without ever beating a top ten fighter

Posted: 14 Mar 2005, 10:18
by Neri
All sanctioning bodies ratings should be labelled as Comedy
Posted: 14 Mar 2005, 10:38
by Zhuge
Cintron easily
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 07:36
by Nels
BWAH-HAHA-HAHAH! That's just made me spray coffee all over my PC. Cheers, the WBO! They really are the most fornicating awful ratings ever, aren't they?
Klose and Villareal (NEWTON fornicating VILLAREAL) over Spinks? And who pray tell has Jennings beaten?
I know I'm sounding like a scratched record, but a guy who hasn't even fought for the BRITISH title is rated number 1 in the world? WTF? Has he, like, taken the Kirkland Laing route then, and gone to America and fought real tough fighters and contenders?
I thought about whingeing about, you know, the unheimlich nature of his management choice and lofty ranking, but on second thoughts: I hope he DOES get to fight the winner of Margarito-Cintron.
And gets his arse handed to him.
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 07:43
by Old bones Ian
Nels wrote:BWAH-HAHA-HAHAH! That's just made me spray coffee all over my PC. Cheers, the WBO! They really are the most fornicating awful ratings ever, aren't they?
Klose and Villareal (NEWTON fornicating VILLAREAL) over Spinks? And who pray tell has Jennings beaten?
I know I'm sounding like a scratched record, but a guy who hasn't even fought for the BRITISH title is rated number 1 in the world? WTF? Has he, like, taken the Kirkland Laing route then, and gone to America and fought real tough fighters and contenders?
I thought about whingeing about, you know, the unheimlich nature of his management choice and lofty ranking, but on second thoughts: I hope he DOES get to fight the winner of Margarito-Cintron.
And gets his arse handed to him.
I agree that the rating are stupid, Jennings isn't even provin on the Euro circuit yet.
But it isn't his fault that they do rate him no1, so you can't really slag off Jenning for that. I doubt very much that his managment would rush into a fight with either Cintron or Margarito, unless the money was to good to turn down.
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 07:49
by Nels
You're right dude. Over-reaction on my part. Too much of this stuff goes on to get so worked up over.
Right, thinking calming thoughts...
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 07:55
by nickd
Cintron wins easily. This is almost as much of a joke as when Michael Gomez was WBO#1 to Freitas - he'd have got smashed to a pulp. The WBO ratings are the worst around surely.
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 07:58
by Loynesy
Well BOXREC have Ted Bami as the world's no. 5 welterweight, I'd say that one is even wider of the mark!!
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 07:58
by JimStone
Nels wrote:but on second thoughts: I hope he DOES get to fight the winner of Margarito-Cintron.
And gets his arse handed to him.
And 'I hope' you die of cancer.
What's Jennings ever done to turn you against him?
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 08:10
by Nels
Thank you so much.
I have nothing against Michael Jennings. Which is why I apologised for my rash remark.
And indeed, did not (and would never) wish him actual bodily harm.
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 08:11
by JimStone
Nels wrote:Thank you so much.
I have nothing against Michael Jennings. Which is why I apologised for my rash remark.
And indeed, did not (and would never) wish him actual bodily harm.
Good.
Posted: 15 Mar 2005, 08:35
by Foggy
This is an absolute joke, no disrespect to Jennings but lets be real he aint done nowt to deserve being the Mandatory challenger, mind you i'd rather see him fight for a WBO title than a WBU

.