si7dog7 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2023, 15:24
Terms are agreed with Wilder blah blah blah
Things are a bit different in Saudi though so might only get xmillion extra
Then we’ve got Fury (another snake oil salesman btw)
Or Ruiz for a third match
Then there’s Hrgovic
But my man has been so so active. Which is unheard of..
Ok I’m paraphrasing. But FFS.
I’m trusting the BBC to post a correct interview
Otherwise
Originally wasn't Joshua v Wilder meant to be on the same billing as Usyk v Fury. Looks like without the undisputed fight attached to it the Saudis don't want it.
As a boxing fan I just think, so why not move it to Vegas or Wembley? But I guess from the perspective of team Joshua and team Wilder they would prefer to wait on the biggest pot possible before pushing all in. And whilst the promise of Saudi money is still out there... this is likely to drag on and on.
Personally, I think they should go to Vegas. The British audience is already locked in for Wilder v Joshua, it's the American market they would need to capture. If they really wanted it, I would say a sensible approach would be make a fight between Joshua and Ruiz Jr. in America. Let Wilder fight the winner of Charr v Miller for the WBA regular. If they both come through that, there will be some hype behind them. They can sell it as a World Title fight to the Americans (like they have been doing with Tank Davis) with the winner being next up for Usyk.
One thing is for certain, they need to forget about Fury. Let him enjoy his retirement and exhibition fights