Page 1 of 4

MTK

Posted: 10 Oct 2023, 13:20
by Spud
MTK & Daniel Kinahan

I honestly believe UK boxing misses them. They pumped a lot of money into the sport. They put on some excellent shows, paid fighters well. In addition they managed fighters well.

I fully appreciate that there are alleged accusations against various personalities so I ask the following…

Am I wrong with what I have written above?

What are your thoughts concerning MTKs contribution to boxing?

Re: MTK

Posted: 10 Oct 2023, 13:57
by si7dog7
Spud wrote: 10 Oct 2023, 13:20 MTK & Daniel Kinahan

I honestly believe UK boxing misses them. They pumped a lot of money into the sport. They put on some excellent shows, paid fighters well. In addition they managed fighters well.

I fully appreciate that there are alleged accusations against various personalities so I ask the following…

Am I wrong with what I have written above?

What are your thoughts concerning MTKs contribution to boxing?
Dunno Spud,
but there are a few ideas of where that money “that was pumped into the sport” came from.

Of course it was, and has always been, the case. Through history, dubious characters have lent their worth to boxing. It goes back over a century at least.

Now the Middle East are at it. Its all the same thing.

Sorry MTK. A few of your top boys got paid. It was all Fugazi tho. A washing machine for cash.

Re: MTK

Posted: 10 Oct 2023, 14:02
by Nightmare Roy
Great bunch of lads :TU:

Re: MTK

Posted: 11 Oct 2023, 12:56
by veriton
Edgelord

Re: MTK

Posted: 11 Oct 2023, 13:45
by THEBUTCH
I miss the MTK live shows on YouTube. They were all good cards with competitive fights.

They'd start with a few 4 rounders for their prospects, move on to more competitive 6 & 8 rounders, then finish up with one or two 10 rounders/12 rounders...good format.

It seemed too good to be true that it would last for long.

Re: MTK

Posted: 11 Oct 2023, 14:04
by Ruthless-RKO
THEBUTCH wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 13:45 I miss the MTK live shows on YouTube. They were all good cards with competitive fights.

They'd start with a few 4 rounders for their prospects, move on to more competitive 6 & 8 rounders, then finish up with one or two 10 rounders/12 rounders...good format.

It seemed too good to be true that it would last for long.
They weren’t bad at all.

Re: MTK

Posted: 11 Oct 2023, 16:21
by SeanBrennan
Spud wrote: 10 Oct 2023, 13:20 MTK & Daniel Kinahan

I honestly believe UK boxing misses them. They pumped a lot of money into the sport. They put on some excellent shows, paid fighters well. In addition they managed fighters well.

I fully appreciate that there are alleged accusations against various personalities so I ask the following…

Am I wrong with what I have written above?

What are your thoughts concerning MTKs contribution to boxing?
Murdering narco terrorists and everyone who fought with or worked with them knew. Alleged my arse. Utter scum. Lots of pathetic nobodies like Mcdonagh still laud them. And the other rats scurried off but should be reminded regularly they were a part of it.

Re: MTK

Posted: 11 Oct 2023, 16:56
by CaptainSpacerod
How does Matthew Macklin still get work ?

Re: MTK

Posted: 11 Oct 2023, 21:58
by Monzon83
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 16:56 How does Matthew Macklin still get work ?
Why has no any serious journalist ever pulled him on his mate Kinahan, the murdering drug dealer? It’s not as though he has hidden it, he started a business with the guy. Why has nobody on Sky ever been made to answer questions on why they employ Macklin?

The media that report on boxing really are gutless.

Re: MTK

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 03:59
by TheLeprechaun
Good for boxing in general but had it banned in Ireland and not really what you want to see in terms of negative press generally. I think it would have probably been the number 1 in the game now if they'd done things differently. Tremendous effort and very well played in some respects but I think what ultimately happened was something most people could see coming a mile away.

Re: MTK

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 07:03
by Nightmare Roy
Monzon83 wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 21:58
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 16:56 How does Matthew Macklin still get work ?
Why has no any serious journalist ever pulled him on his mate Kinahan, the murdering drug dealer? It’s not as though he has hidden it, he started a business with the guy. Why has nobody on Sky ever been made to answer questions on why they employ Macklin?

The media that report on boxing really are gutless.
Any serious journalists would be black listed immediately in boxing.

Re: MTK

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 07:07
by cormack
boxing has enough detractors without the additional accusation of drug money being involved - or washed .

Re: MTK

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 07:15
by Twinkle Toes
Chisora pretty much let it out that Daniel is well involved in getting the Usyk/Fury fight over the line.

Expect Gareth A Davies to ask about it never.

Re: MTK

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 07:31
by jwfg
SeanBrennan wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 16:21
Spud wrote: 10 Oct 2023, 13:20 MTK & Daniel Kinahan

I honestly believe UK boxing misses them. They pumped a lot of money into the sport. They put on some excellent shows, paid fighters well. In addition they managed fighters well.

I fully appreciate that there are alleged accusations against various personalities so I ask the following…

Am I wrong with what I have written above?

What are your thoughts concerning MTKs contribution to boxing?
Murdering narco terrorists and everyone who fought with or worked with them knew. Alleged my arse. Utter scum. Lots of pathetic nobodies like Mcdonagh still laud them. And the other rats scurried off but should be reminded regularly they were a part of it.
Well said that man. :TU:

Re: MTK

Posted: 12 Oct 2023, 16:34
by SeanBrennan
jwfg wrote: 12 Oct 2023, 07:31
SeanBrennan wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 16:21
Spud wrote: 10 Oct 2023, 13:20 MTK & Daniel Kinahan

I honestly believe UK boxing misses them. They pumped a lot of money into the sport. They put on some excellent shows, paid fighters well. In addition they managed fighters well.

I fully appreciate that there are alleged accusations against various personalities so I ask the following…

Am I wrong with what I have written above?

What are your thoughts concerning MTKs contribution to boxing?
Murdering narco terrorists and everyone who fought with or worked with them knew. Alleged my arse. Utter scum. Lots of pathetic nobodies like Mcdonagh still laud them. And the other rats scurried off but should be reminded regularly they were a part of it.
Well said that man. :TU:
cheers mate

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 10:25
by Glass Joe
i enjoyed the York Hall MTK bills and the Tournament, I went to the semi-final one with Ryan Walsh stopping the South American and Leigh Wood. It was a top bill.

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 10:44
by CaptainSpacerod
Monzon83 wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 21:58
CaptainSpacerod wrote: 11 Oct 2023, 16:56 How does Matthew Macklin still get work ?
Why has no any serious journalist ever pulled him on his mate Kinahan, the murdering drug dealer? It’s not as though he has hidden it, he started a business with the guy. Why has nobody on Sky ever been made to answer questions on why they employ Macklin?

The media that report on boxing really are gutless.
Sky were very quick to sack Keys and Gray for partaking in some mildly unsavoury sexist banter off air so clearly they want to be seen to be doing the right thing.

Odd then that they seem perfectly happy to continue employing the dull as ditchwater Macklin despite his well publicised hobnobbing with and business connections to narco terrorists.

Almost as if they’re under duress ….

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 11:21
by veriton
That's a silly claim. Boxing is full of people out of the sewer - being slurped by camp media toffs - so what difference does Macklin make.

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 11:53
by CaptainSpacerod
veriton wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 11:21 That's a silly claim. Boxing is full of people out of the sewer - being slurped by camp media toffs - so what difference does Macklin make.
The difference he makes is that he’s directly employed by one of the major national broadcasters.

Seems odd doesn’t it that in an age when big business falls over itself to be whiter than white and cause no offence to anyone they would employ a man with such a firm link to major league criminals ? Why not just choose another identikit pundit off the conveyer belt of ex boxers scrambling for media work.

It’s different for example than somebody saying Fury should be blacklisted for his alleged links to Kinahan, he’s the talent and pretty much indispensable. Matt’s just a very unimportant cog in the machine.

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 13:16
by si7dog7
So much better when gangsters were involved.
I’m sure they’ll find me.
When I don’t post next April. Never utter MT? Ever again. Get you iced.

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 14:36
by Coco
MTK were good to boxers

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 15:49
by veriton
Coco wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 14:36 MTK were good to boxers
True. And Jimmy Savile built Stoke Mandeville hospital.

Re: MTK

Posted: 13 Oct 2023, 16:27
by SeanBrennan
veriton wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 15:49
Coco wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 14:36 MTK were good to boxers
True. And Jimmy Savile built Stoke Mandeville hospital.
Amen. I think Spud is hoping Uncle Dan will give him a few quid for his old begging bowl fundraiser.

Re: MTK

Posted: 14 Oct 2023, 03:27
by Spud
veriton wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 15:49
Coco wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 14:36 MTK were good to boxers
True. And Jimmy Savile built Stoke Mandeville hospital.
I fully appreciate the point you are making.

Re: MTK

Posted: 14 Oct 2023, 03:32
by Spud
SeanBrennan wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 16:27
veriton wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 15:49
Coco wrote: 13 Oct 2023, 14:36 MTK were good to boxers
True. And Jimmy Savile built Stoke Mandeville hospital.
Amen. I think Spud is hoping Uncle Dan will give him a few quid for his old begging bowl fundraiser.
As mentioned on another thread I was diagnosed with Parkinson’s a few years back and my
Wife did a fundraiser fin 2022 for the cause.

I find your mocking of that incredibly sad and pathetic.

You can be pleased with yourself I am stunned you are mocking me using my fundraiser as an excuse to verbally attack me in this way.