Sven Ottke vs. Canelo
Posted: 05 May 2024, 09:14
168,12 rounds in Germany.
I hear you. But... I decided to take a little risk hereNazNaci1 wrote: โ09 May 2024, 17:25 Can't see it.
Canelo would be docked points for low blows etc....there is no way Canelo wins, not because he isn't good enough etc....You just don't get the W vs Ottke in Germany.
Watched his fights with Brewer I & II, Tate, Glencoffe, Mitchell and Reid and with a lot of help from the refs, some very generous scoring, won those bouts, which he probably would have lost in any other country.
Back then, Germany was notorious for favouring the hometown fighters, no matter how the fight panned out.
Short of knocking him spark out, he isn't winning and even then, he would probably be disqualified for some kind of foul.
I am with you anywhere but Germany. I think an in-form Canelo could dominate Ottke. But in terms of scoring/refereeing fights, while there are bad decisions most places, Germany during that era set a standard for corruptionEdwardRevolver1993 wrote: โ10 May 2024, 05:01I hear you. But... I decided to take a little risk hereNazNaci1 wrote: โ09 May 2024, 17:25 Can't see it.
Canelo would be docked points for low blows etc....there is no way Canelo wins, not because he isn't good enough etc....You just don't get the W vs Ottke in Germany.
Watched his fights with Brewer I & II, Tate, Glencoffe, Mitchell and Reid and with a lot of help from the refs, some very generous scoring, won those bouts, which he probably would have lost in any other country.
Back then, Germany was notorious for favouring the hometown fighters, no matter how the fight panned out.
Short of knocking him spark out, he isn't winning and even then, he would probably be disqualified for some kind of foul.. I believe in Canelo, in this particular match-up. Though, of course, all the things you mentioned will make it tough even for a VIP fighter to get a clear decision.
Yes, true. Interestingly, Axel Schulz may have been the unluckiest German boxer of that time. Back in the days, when it was very hard for a visiting fighter to win a decision in Germany, Schulz appeared on the wrong end of two close decisions - against Moorer and Botha. Ironically, Schulz had a very good case of actually winning both fightsgiacomino wrote: โ10 May 2024, 14:59I am with you anywhere but Germany. I think an in-form Canelo could dominate Ottke. But in terms of scoring/refereeing fights, while there are bad decisions most places, Germany during that era set a standard for corruptionEdwardRevolver1993 wrote: โ10 May 2024, 05:01I hear you. But... I decided to take a little risk hereNazNaci1 wrote: โ09 May 2024, 17:25 Can't see it.
Canelo would be docked points for low blows etc....there is no way Canelo wins, not because he isn't good enough etc....You just don't get the W vs Ottke in Germany.
Watched his fights with Brewer I & II, Tate, Glencoffe, Mitchell and Reid and with a lot of help from the refs, some very generous scoring, won those bouts, which he probably would have lost in any other country.
Back then, Germany was notorious for favouring the hometown fighters, no matter how the fight panned out.
Short of knocking him spark out, he isn't winning and even then, he would probably be disqualified for some kind of foul.. I believe in Canelo, in this particular match-up. Though, of course, all the things you mentioned will make it tough even for a VIP fighter to get a clear decision.
Sturm was an odd case. He got favorable decisions on several occasions in his prime in Germany but he also had a couple that he lost/drew later in his career where he could have gotten the nod.EdwardRevolver1993 wrote: โ11 May 2024, 02:46Yes, true. Interestingly, Axel Schulz may have been the unluckiest German boxer of that time. Back in the days, when it was very hard for a visiting fighter to win a decision in Germany, Schulz appeared on the wrong end of two close decisions - against Moorer and Botha. Ironically, Schulz had a very good case of actually winning both fightsgiacomino wrote: โ10 May 2024, 14:59I am with you anywhere but Germany. I think an in-form Canelo could dominate Ottke. But in terms of scoring/refereeing fights, while there are bad decisions most places, Germany during that era set a standard for corruptionEdwardRevolver1993 wrote: โ10 May 2024, 05:01
I hear you. But... I decided to take a little risk here. I believe in Canelo, in this particular match-up. Though, of course, all the things you mentioned will make it tough even for a VIP fighter to get a clear decision.
![]()
Oh, yeah. Geale, Murray and Soliman (1st bout) fights all could've went Sturm's way. All took place in Germany. But Sturm is 0-1-1 in those fights.giacomino wrote: โ11 May 2024, 14:08Sturm was an odd case. He got favorable decisions on several occasions in his prime in Germany but he also had a couple that he lost/drew later in his career where he could have gotten the nod.EdwardRevolver1993 wrote: โ11 May 2024, 02:46Yes, true. Interestingly, Axel Schulz may have been the unluckiest German boxer of that time. Back in the days, when it was very hard for a visiting fighter to win a decision in Germany, Schulz appeared on the wrong end of two close decisions - against Moorer and Botha. Ironically, Schulz had a very good case of actually winning both fights![]()