Page 1 of 3

Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 09:45
by straali
I remember when there used to be frequent comment on here about how annoying Jim Watt was as a Sky pundit.
My God......I'd be DELIGHTED if we could get someone like Watt back instead of the miserable, banal, platitude-factory that is Matthew Macklin. Does he hold a cache of Adam Smith donkey-sex videos? He can't be employed for his personality or insight, that's for fornicating sure.
And don't even get me started on Johnny Nelson.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 09:51
by Nightmare Roy
Arum punches, right on the chen :yay: o thought he was decent

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 09:51
by Ruthless-RKO
Nelson is the cringiest of the cringiest. There are no words!

Everytime he does interviews with IFL or whoever, he always seems to be chewing on something.

They give him too much airtime.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 09:55
by Coco
Sky coverage is poor, their promotor is poor too.

Nelson is well spoken and has forgotten more than most folk will ever know but he has to follow the sky script, probably written by Smith.

Saying that, talking about commentators, Shane McGuigan was excellent last night

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 10:06
by Fray Bentos
The best for me was Steve Holdsworth - a masterclass in delivering the perfect fight commentary, probably far too honest to become a Sky bumlicker. :verysad:

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 10:27
by forcefraser
No one comes close to Ron and his fistilistic fusilage

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 11:03
by maverick23
I enjoyed listening to Adam Smith again last night on the DAZN feed.

He got a lot of heat on Sky, similar to Watt, but I thought he was good last night and didn’t favour the supposed home fighters.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 11:15
by Fearful_Freddie
forcefraser wrote: 22 Dec 2024, 10:27 No one comes close to Ron and his fistilistic fusilage
Loves talking about clock faces does our Ron.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 11:18
by Jimmy2025
Fray Bentos wrote: 22 Dec 2024, 10:06 The best for me was Steve Holdsworth - a masterclass in delivering the perfect fight commentary, probably far too honest to become a Sky bumlicker. :verysad:
I liked him too. Steve was well suited to what he did back in the Eurosport days. Working by himself, often, hundreds of miles from where the fight was happening or happened. Similar to Craig Charles commentating on Takeshi's Castle.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 11:18
by JamesPhilips
Nightmare Roy wrote: 22 Dec 2024, 09:51 Arum punches, right on the chen :yay: o thought he was decent
Bang on the chen
Lmao I miss him I thought he told it as it was

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 11:23
by Noxy
Watt was quality, one of the best. Nelson is always roaring with laughter at whatever anyone says to him. I don’t doubt he has the knowledge, but it’s what you do with the knowledge that matters.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 11:59
by stujones
Jesus, I thought he died then. Yes he was the very best. When you really couldn’t not tell he was a boxer, he was so articulate when he spoke. He is so dearly missed.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 12:46
by black panther
I miss Jim Watt I thought he was quality.
https://x.com/loveirishboxing/status/35 ... 40/photo/1

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 13:24
by dan28uk
stujones wrote: 22 Dec 2024, 11:59 Jesus, I thought he died then. Yes he was the very best. When you really couldn’t not tell he was a boxer, he was so articulate when he spoke. He is so dearly missed.


that one shook him right down to his boots

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 13:32
by margaret thatcher
i liked watt, wasnt perfect but one of the better comms

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 13:43
by Ricky
Jim Watt on Sky & the HBO team inc Manny Steward, mid naughties... those were the days of peak boxing coverage imo.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 13:56
by handsofstone
Ricky wrote: 22 Dec 2024, 13:43 Jim Watt on Sky & the HBO team inc Manny Steward, mid naughties... those were the days of peak boxing coverage imo.
Agreed

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 14:04
by TheLeprechaun
I always hated the stick Watt got. He spent decades as a pundit/commentator and knew what he was doing. Watt was one of the most boring fighters I've ever seen when he was active but he was effective. He went 15 rounds with a peak Alexis Arguello which says it all. As a commentator, he did bring some insight. One of the criticisms was that he formed an opinion and didn't change it but I just think he was true to his opinions and honest. He was always good at scoping out whether or not an import was good within the first minute of the fight.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 14:27
by a force
He was brilliant for a long time but his time was up. Some of his commentary in his latter years were really poor.

His commentary on Valuev - Haye & Porter - Brook were especially bad.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 14:44
by Coco
TheLeprechaun wrote: 22 Dec 2024, 14:04 I always hated the stick Watt got. He spent decades as a pundit/commentator and knew what he was doing. Watt was one of the most boring fighters I've ever seen when he was active but he was effective. He went 15 rounds with a peak Alexis Arguello which says it all. As a commentator, he did bring some insight. One of the criticisms was that he formed an opinion and didn't change it but I just think he was true to his opinions and honest. He was always good at scoping out whether or not an import was good within the first minute of the fight.
Top commentator, generally the Johnny come latelys are poor, don't think much of Macklin, Barker is ok, Woodhall is good, McCory was great, McGuigan was really good last night.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 15:18
by maninthemiddle
Jim Watt was one of the smartest most knowledgeable people around boxing in his time..just look at some of the decisions he made in his own career, one shrewd guy. Like everyone people got too familiar and tired of his analysis. The one thing that surprises me since is much less skilled men have held the same role for a period that much outstays their worth…
Can’t believe of all the channels the only variety they seem to offer is the addition of female pundits/presenters. They haven’t gone for a varied line up of boxers, trainers, managers, referee/judge etc.
The innovation is surprisingly limited even from the “game changers”

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 18:10
by rob h
What happened to Ian Darke?

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 18:15
by TheLeprechaun
He got offered big money to commentate on football. I reckon Adam Smith was delighted because it paved the way for him to pollute broadcasts with this bullsh*t commentary. Nothing more nauseating than the "A star" commentator rolling up to commentate on the main card, forcing myself and my mates to mute the broadcast. Just when you thought the cockroach was gone, he resurfaces and continues to poison broadcasts with his toxicity. Absolute pillock.

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 19:04
by Coco
Who was it that said Smith always turned up to commentate on the main event, like Sinatra in LV at The Sands.

By then he was too high profile to do the undercard fights

Re: Jim Watt

Posted: 22 Dec 2024, 19:07
by margaret thatcher
the worst for me was nick halling, just off the chart levels of cheerleading for the house fighter

smith isnt much farther behind. a performance that sums him up to me was when kieran molloy was fighting some tough mexican. it was a gruelling battle where molloy was dropped and had to absolutely dig it all out of himself to win a 1 point decision (the right score). instead of focusing on how good and competitive a fight it was, smith just went on about how 'classy' molloy boxed and how he was levels above other than the kd, and how the score was too close. he just has some compulusion with trying to sell a bs narrative

watt i always liked. ya he had off nights but who doesnt. he was much more balanced than most.

ahhhhhhrm puncheeeees

bang on the chen