Page 1 of 1
The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 05:36
by Sweet Dick Willie
I mean, fornicate, man. I've followed them from day one and both of them, not just the lil one but both of them, were supposed to be the future of the sport. And still I think they could've been, it's just the motherfucking family, money, love, ego and every other sad thing that makes us human. fornicate!
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 07:13
by Ruthless-RKO
Jermell still did ok.
When Jermall moved to 160. He couldn’t get a fight. There was no in-house fights for him.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 09:56
by Cent0089
Jermell was undisputed champ, pretty solid achievement IMO. Found his limits against top oposition, but his only real loss was to Canelo. maybe he will end up in HoF. Jermall protected his 0 too much and became irrelevant last years.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 13:46
by apollo creed
Mell is the more psychically stronger between them. Mall was avoiding Jacobs, GGG, Canelo at 160. I think Mall is gonna return and sell/cash out his 0 to Canelo.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 13:47
by Ruthless-RKO
[quote="apollo creed" post_id=6078283. I think Mall is gonna return and sell/cash out his 0 to Canelo.
[/quote]
No one wants to see that now.
Too late.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 14:36
by Sweet Dick Willie
Yes, Mell's only real loss was to Canelo, but he hidn' teven try to win.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 15:20
by apollo creed
Ruthless-RKO wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 13:47
[quote="apollo creed" post_id=6078283. I think Mall is gonna return and sell/cash out his 0 to Canelo.
No one wants to see that now.
Too late.
[/quote]
Canelo would sell this fight big time. Another money grab.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 16:10
by Jeff_lacy_ko
Jermall made good money fighting once a year for haymon. He is probably set for life with minimal damage
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 07:29
by apollo creed
JackSprocket wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 14:36
Yes, Mell's only real loss was to Canelo, but he hidn' teven try to win.
Indeed, he was like let's survive and collect that big cheque. Don't want to risk to get t/ko'd.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 07:37
by apollo creed
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 16:10
Jermall made good money fighting once a year for haymon. He is probably set for life with minimal damage
I think he made good business. Also I think he has some good investments too that allows him to fight when he wants. I wanted to see him fighting Jacobs or GGG back in the day.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 06 Jan 2025, 14:06
by dempseyfire
JackSprocket wrote: ↑05 Jan 2025, 14:36
Yes, Mell's only real loss was to Canelo, but he hidn' teven try to win.
He got a gift vs Castano in their first fight. Would've lost to Trout if not for two KDs.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 17:17
by ordsalloriginator
the are BUMS
Privileged, pampered, protected, over paid, great black hope, diva BUMS
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 08 Jan 2025, 18:10
by apollo creed
ordsalloriginator wrote: ↑08 Jan 2025, 17:17
the are BUMS
Privileged, pampered, protected, over paid, great black hope, diva BUMS
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 09 Jan 2025, 10:53
by Sweet Dick Willie
I kinda like this, though I totally disagree
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 03:14
by Taansend
I'd pay $9.99 to see them fight each other
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 11:51
by cormack
charlos are the US version of Eubank JR
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 16:28
by apollo creed
stevec@france wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 11:51
charlos are the US version of Eubank JR
yep, its a pity they didn't fight like mall vs cej
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 16:43
by gilgamesh
They're both good boxers. Even very good. They got very near the top of their profession, and in Jermell's case he fought some of the guys that were on top. Everybody can't be the best. and that's ok. It doesn't mean they're bums. They're just not the best.
The fact that 1 family produced 2 guys that went pretty far in the sport is impressive, and not something that happens too often. They're still relevant enough that other significant wins for either of them aren't out of the question.
Re: The Charlos
Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 17:56
by Sweet Dick Willie
gilgamesh wrote: ↑12 Jan 2025, 16:43
They're both good boxers. Even very good. They got very near the top of their profession, and in Jermell's case he fought some of the guys that were on top. Everybody can't be the best. and that's ok. It doesn't mean they're bums. They're just not the best.
The fact that 1 family produced 2 guys that went pretty far in the sport is impressive, and not something that happens too often. They're still relevant enough that other significant wins for either of them aren't out of the question.
Good post this, thanks!