Page 1 of 1
Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 00:08
by Les Norton
Ring Magazine claims that a “source” has advised that the bout has been cancelled.
If true, that didn’t take long to fall over
Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 02:29
by Cent0089
Good, i was not fan of that fight. But i am worried now about Jake Paul BS

Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 10:05
by squiggy
Good. Just as a hypothetical fight it has sucked all the air out of the room long enough.
Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 10:33
by JC
Reckon they have access to a pretty reliable 'source' on this one.
Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 13:18
by JCS
Cent0089 wrote: ↑06 Feb 2025, 02:29
Good, i was not fan of that fight. But i am worried now about Jake Paul BS
Why? It will be wonderful to see Jake Paul get beat down.
Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 13:33
by gilgamesh
Crawford needed this one a lot more than Canelo did. I wonder what caused it to fall through?
Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 14:30
by cormack
FFS it was never on !
Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 15:50
by Cent0089
JCS wrote: ↑06 Feb 2025, 13:18
Cent0089 wrote: ↑06 Feb 2025, 02:29
Good, i was not fan of that fight. But i am worried now about Jake Paul BS
Why? It will be wonderful to see Jake Paul get beat down.
Yeah i wanna see it too, but it would be great if someone not as good as Canelo would do that damage
Re: Canelo v Crawford OFF??
Posted: 06 Feb 2025, 16:25
by Thomastearns
Canelo will be 35 in July, the same age GGG was when they first fought.
However, he is no GGG.
He's clearly deteriorating and might feel a loss to the even older Crawford will destroy his legacy.
Therefore the Jake Paul fight makes more sense.
I wouldn't blame him, he's always been risk aversive.
But enough of the Canelo fanfare.
Ironically enough, although the Paul fight won't be adding anything to his legacy either, millions of fans would like to see him destroy Paul.
I'd be one of them.