Page 1 of 2

The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 22:51
by Sweet Dick Willie
I really digged Maurico Lara and Florian Marku. Neither of them really amounted to anything. Well Lara had a great victory over Wood but turned out he was a drug cheat. Also Edis Tatli could have been someting but no one was willing to fight him.

And then theres of course Tank and Haney...

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 23:04
by gregregegg
Josh Kelly.

Louis Ortiz

Hughie fury

Gassiev.

The charlos.

Jalov, yoka, Dychco.

Gorman

Milas

Strong heavyweight bias, I guess it s the Div where someone can seem like a sure thing and not be.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 23:08
by margaret thatcher
victor ortiz, still won a world title, but he was so good offensively and with that couldve done a lot more with his head on straight

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 23:16
by gilgamesh
Kelly Pavlik was a letdown after becoming Champion.

I suppose Gervonta Davis has been a letdown his whole career as he kinda seemed like he was a fighter on the way up, and he just kinda stayed a fighter on the way up without ever going up :lol:

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 15 Jun 2025, 23:27
by gregregegg
Buatsi, eubank, billy joe, kell brook, brock jarvis, Thurman,

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 04:39
by JC
Joan Guzman and Frankie Gavin come to mind.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 10:02
by robbydecker
The one that stands out the most at the moment imo is "Bahkrum Murtalaziev".
Hopefully I spelled his name correctly.
He has basically seemingly disappeared or fallen into The Bermuda Triangle after his Epic Victory over "Tim Tsyzu".
:-?

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 14:03
by RajC
Current active boxers id go:
Bakhodir Jalolov- underwhelming double Olympic gold medalist yet has fought next to no one, and his next fight vs Cardillo continues the trend.

Nicholas Walters- icing Donaire and Dorchinyan, then quitting vs Loma and disappearing then coming back this year and not looking the same.

Keith Thurman- I know he’s a former unified world champ at 147 but I still think he could have been even better if it wasn’t for the injuries and the time out the ring.

HM- Andy Ruiz/Jared Anderson/Demetrius Andrade/Joshua Buatsi

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 16 Jun 2025, 23:18
by Jeff_lacy_ko
Pavliks decision to take slightly more money to fight hopkins rather than winky wright is an all time bad decision

Fighters who are wastes of talent disappoint me. Joan guzman is high up for me

James toney could have been the best ever if he would have ate less food

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 17 Jun 2025, 15:05
by giacomino
This goes back a ways, but, a few who won alphabet belts but could have had better careers:
Danny Romero
Jorge Castro (trained by fighting and ate his way from welterweight to cruiserweight)
Hugo Garay
Leeonzer Barber
Pablo Chacon

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 17 Jun 2025, 16:25
by IKSRTFO
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 16 Jun 2025, 23:18 Pavliks decision to take slightly more money to fight hopkins rather than winky wright is an all time bad decision

Fighters who are wastes of talent disappoint me. Joan guzman is high up for me

James toney could have been the best ever if he would have ate less food
I think he would've been beaten by Winky for less money. Would've have been the domination that Hopkins did, but beaten by Wright.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 17 Jun 2025, 16:41
by Lenny Cravats
Odlanier Solís has to be up there. Outstanding amateur, was fat and lazy the minute he turned pro.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 17 Jun 2025, 19:15
by Jeff_lacy_ko
IKSRTFO wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 16:25
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 16 Jun 2025, 23:18 Pavliks decision to take slightly more money to fight hopkins rather than winky wright is an all time bad decision

Fighters who are wastes of talent disappoint me. Joan guzman is high up for me

James toney could have been the best ever if he would have ate less food
I think he would've been beaten by Winky for less money. Would've have been the domination that Hopkins did, but beaten by Wright.
I dont think so. Winky was small for 160, didnt fight at angles like hop/martinez and stood right in front of people

I think it would have been even

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 17 Jun 2025, 20:11
by IKSRTFO
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 19:15
IKSRTFO wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 16:25
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 16 Jun 2025, 23:18 Pavliks decision to take slightly more money to fight hopkins rather than winky wright is an all time bad decision

Fighters who are wastes of talent disappoint me. Joan guzman is high up for me

James toney could have been the best ever if he would have ate less food
I think he would've been beaten by Winky for less money. Would've have been the domination that Hopkins did, but beaten by Wright.
I dont think so. Winky was small for 160, didnt fight at angles like hop/martinez and stood right in front of people

I think it would have been even
Pavlik is slow of hand and foot, no lateral movement and best victory outside of Taylor is Edison Miranda. He's never given me indication that he could comfortably beat someone like Winky. Even when the Hopkins fight was announced, I was shocked by those thinking he would walk through Hopkins. When Taylor realized his power wouldn't pull through, he gave Winky trouble with movements and angles, something Pavlik didn't have.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 17 Jun 2025, 20:36
by goose 5
Mauricio Lara was a great choice, imo.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 19 Jun 2025, 10:42
by robbydecker
giacomino wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 15:05 This goes back a ways, but, a few who won alphabet belts but could have had better careers:
Danny Romero
Jorge Castro (trained by fighting and ate his way from welterweight to cruiserweight)
Hugo Garay
Leeonzer Barber
Pablo Chacon
Good call on Romero and Castro.
I remember both of them fellows.
Romero was initially billed as a Mike Tyson of The Flyweight division. He was one Huge 112 lb'er with Huge Power.
Castro was a Tank, Durability wise, and also was equipped with a Great Stamina capacity. The proverbial Action Fighter.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 19 Jun 2025, 10:54
by JC
giacomino wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 15:05Hugo Garay
That's a name I had totally forgotten about. I remember him being one tough looking dude, but not much about his career. Did you fell he had a lot of potential?

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 19 Jun 2025, 11:13
by Ruthless-RKO
Lots of pointless boxers that were hyped and amounted to very little. Hearn was the perfect salesman in the last 10 years.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 19 Jun 2025, 11:53
by giacomino
JC wrote: 19 Jun 2025, 10:54
giacomino wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 15:05Hugo Garay
That's a name I had totally forgotten about. I remember him being one tough looking dude, but not much about his career. Did you fell he had a lot of potential?
I thought he won at least one of the fights with Erdei (definitely the first) but they were in Germany and nobody was getting a win against Erdei there. I was impressed with how he won a belt, then pretty much dominated a highly regarded Braehmer. But then he just got outworked by Campillo and kind of fell off the wagon. I thought he had a good work rate and (until then) a solid chin, what he lacked was stopping power. He could have been an alphabet belt holder longer than the year that he was, but he was pretty well done before he turned 30

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 19 Jun 2025, 20:36
by Perseus
IKSRTFO wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 20:11
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 19:15
IKSRTFO wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 16:25

I think he would've been beaten by Winky for less money. Would've have been the domination that Hopkins did, but beaten by Wright.
I dont think so. Winky was small for 160, didnt fight at angles like hop/martinez and stood right in front of people

I think it would have been even
Pavlik is slow of hand and foot, no lateral movement and best victory outside of Taylor is Edison Miranda. He's never given me indication that he could comfortably beat someone like Winky. Even when the Hopkins fight was announced, I was shocked by those thinking he would walk through Hopkins. When Taylor realized his power wouldn't pull through, he gave Winky trouble with movements and angles, something Pavlik didn't have.
After his fights with Taylor I would like to have seen Pavlik fight any of: Abraham, Williams, Sturm, Mundine and Wright.... all of whom HBO talking heads were naming as potential opponents.
......but Kelly and his team tried to cherry-pick an old-man with name value and it back-fired big time.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 26 Jun 2025, 16:13
by Syntax Error
Audley Harrison - Olympic champion, turns pro with all that hype, gives it the chat, then as soon as he fights someone that could hit him back, he becomes terrified of his own shadow.

Honourable mention to Dominick Guinn whom, along with Harrison, I thought were going to rule the division post Lewis, Tyson and Holyfield, but nothing of the sort happened.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 27 Jun 2025, 15:05
by leftrightleft
I always thought Frankie Gomez i think he was a welterweight, was going to do something but he just disappeared

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 28 Jun 2025, 12:08
by BroughtonRulesRefuge
IKSRTFO wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 20:11
Jeff_lacy_ko wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 19:15
IKSRTFO wrote: 17 Jun 2025, 16:25

I think he would've been beaten by Winky for less money. Would've have been the domination that Hopkins did, but beaten by Wright.
I dont think so. Winky was small for 160, didnt fight at angles like hop/martinez and stood right in front of people

I think it would have been even
Pavlik is slow of hand and foot, no lateral movement and best victory outside of Taylor is Edison Miranda. He's never given me indication that he could comfortably beat someone like Winky. Even when the Hopkins fight was announced, I was shocked by those thinking he would walk through Hopkins. When Taylor realized his power wouldn't pull through, he gave Winky trouble with movements and angles, something Pavlik didn't have.

- After Pavlik won the title in his epic Taylor series that was quite impressive, he sorta went off the wagon in celebration and ended up putting a fist through a window that resulted in some permanent physical damage and blood infection that may have put him in ICU, but it's been a while and full details are now hazy. Neither he and most especially Taylor have ever been the same as substance abusers.

40-2, 35 KOs ain't shabby. He came, he saw, he conquered and then made a soft landing.

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 28 Jun 2025, 22:09
by Les Norton
Panchito Bojado and Felix Verdejo

Re: The most disapointting boxers?

Posted: 28 Jun 2025, 22:40
by skanksta
:salut: those two