BoxRec

WBA - Three world champions.
WBO - Ranks anyone Fwank knows.
WBC - Ranks a 46 year old who hasn't fought in four years and hasn't won in six.
IBF - Strips world champion the day after they win the title.

They all have some bad traits.

WBC generally favour boxers they want to.

WBO also rank Bob’s guys. They always seem to go for the WBO title too.

IBF don’t only strip boxers a day after they wins they also have crap rankings.

WBA let’s not go there.

WBA the worst for me.

Can we add an ALL OF THEM option?

As organizations I really don't have respect for any of them.

I don't think any one Championship is superior to the other. The quality of the Champion is what makes these belts matter.

I hate the IBFs shitty rankings. That they force the mandatories is a good thing, but completely negated by constantly ranking god awful canadians as the challengers.