So what do you guys think about Hector Camacho?
Posted: 13 Oct 2025, 03:43
For me he is the number one of all time. He might have been the quickest boxer ever. The most macho for sure.
Great fighter that was the Island of Puerto Rico' most complete boxer ever. He could do it all and was very flamboyant. He knew how to sell tickets in boxing.JackSprocket wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 03:43 For me he is the number one of all time. He might have been the quickest boxer ever. The most macho for sure.
I could count with one hand and to tell you the truth, there are not many.JackSprocket wrote: ↑13 Oct 2025, 16:14 What do you think elmersalsa, was there ever a faster boxer than Hector "Macho" Camacho?
Speaking of fighters that had faster hands and feet than Hector "Macho" Camacho, in my view, would be:JackSprocket wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 01:05 I'm finding it hard to think of any. Who do you have in mind?
Roy Jones Jr was a total beast.JackSprocket wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 10:24 Ray Leonard, yes. He might have been faster. But Roy Jones, never!
Camacho could probably have taken Cotto don't ya think? Would've been competitive though. I can see he and Benitez being very competitive as well.
Have you lost leave of your senses Jack.elmersalsa wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 18:17Roy Jones Jr was a total beast.JackSprocket wrote: ↑14 Oct 2025, 10:24 Ray Leonard, yes. He might have been faster. But Roy Jones, never!
The Limón fight was an example of two guys heading in a different direction and of styles. Bazooka was perfect for an up-and-coming Camacho. He had been through the Chacon wars and was a relatively slow banger who, at his best, tried to wear his opponents down. He was never the same after the last Chacon fight and was on the way down. Camacho was super fast and on his way up, he hadn’t been involved in a lot of tough fights and just blitzed Limón. His speed and skills would always have given Limón a rough time but at 29, Bakooza was shot. He won only three of his last 14 fights after the last war with Chacon.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑15 Oct 2025, 19:34 Watched Camacho some before he got a title shot. He looked like he was going to be the next superstar. Looked great against Limon. Had some other impressive performances for a while after that. Then he started to gradually regress. Started to become just a guy acting goofy and not actually doing anything in the ring. By the time he fought Mancini he looked awful. Regrouped a little bit and was at the Greg Haugen/Vinny Pazienza level for while.
Guess we should not judge him on how great he could have been and judge him by what happened. Certainly deserving of being in the HOF.
He lost onesidedly to Trinidad when he moved up to welterweight (past his best) . I dunno about Cotto. Remember, at 140, Camacho struggled with Mancini, who hadn’t fought in four years, split fights with Haugen and lost every minute of his bout with Chavez (as did Haugen). Cotto would have beaten the versions of Mancini and Haugen who fought Camacho. A fight with Benitez would have been a chess match but I don’t see the Camacho who we saw post-Rosario beating him
Agree with everything in both of these posts. That Rosario fight was the damndest thing. Camacho hung on and won, but he was never the same fighter after that fifth round. It was like getting hurt changed him forever.giacomino wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025, 02:03The Limón fight was an example of two guys heading in a different direction and of styles. Bazooka was perfect for an up-and-coming Camacho. He had been through the Chacon wars and was a relatively slow banger who, at his best, tried to wear his opponents down. He was never the same after the last Chacon fight and was on the way down. Camacho was super fast and on his way up, he hadn’t been involved in a lot of tough fights and just blitzed Limón. His speed and skills would always have given Limón a rough time but at 29, Bakooza was shot. He won only three of his last 14 fights after the last war with Chacon.Ambling Alp II wrote: ↑15 Oct 2025, 19:34 Watched Camacho some before he got a title shot. He looked like he was going to be the next superstar. Looked great against Limon. Had some other impressive performances for a while after that. Then he started to gradually regress. Started to become just a guy acting goofy and not actually doing anything in the ring. By the time he fought Mancini he looked awful. Regrouped a little bit and was at the Greg Haugen/Vinny Pazienza level for while.
Guess we should not judge him on how great he could have been and judge him by what happened. Certainly deserving of being in the HOF.
Camacho finally looked vulnerable vs Rosario, a fight that could have gone either way.
Rosario was one of the biggest hitters in lightweight and jr. welterweight history, and a good boxer when he was patient, which wasn't always the case. I thought he won the Camacho fight but Camacho clearly backed off after being hurt because he'd never been rattled like that. He probably did OK in the bank account department considering he got paid well to fight a shot Mancini, Haugen, Chavez, Trinidad and De La Hoya. All of those were money fights then and vs Chavez, Trinidad and De La Hoya, he knew going in he just wanted to last the distancegilgamesh wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025, 16:45 It's not uncommon for a guy to start to become gunshy after being knocked out, but it's a little unusual to see a guy be gunshy for the rest of his career after simply being hurt.
He was never stopped though so maybe being gunshy was ultimately the right call. For his long term health anyway, maybe not his bank account.
Even though Hector "Macho" Camacho fought those guys you mentioned, he could take a shot. Julio Cesar Chavez kicked his azz very bad, but he didn't go down at any point.giacomino wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025, 06:50Rosario was one of the biggest hitters in lightweight and jr. welterweight history, and a good boxer when he was patient, which wasn't always the case. I thought he won the Camacho fight but Camacho clearly backed off after being hurt because he'd never been rattled like that. He probably did OK in the bank account department considering he got paid well to fight a shot Mancini, Haugen, Chavez, Trinidad and De La Hoya. All of those were money fights then and vs Chavez, Trinidad and De La Hoya, he knew going in he just wanted to last the distancegilgamesh wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025, 16:45 It's not uncommon for a guy to start to become gunshy after being knocked out, but it's a little unusual to see a guy be gunshy for the rest of his career after simply being hurt.
He was never stopped though so maybe being gunshy was ultimately the right call. For his long term health anyway, maybe not his bank account.
Yes, but the fact that he wasn’t very often speakselmersalsa wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025, 08:56Even though Hector "Macho" Camacho fought those guys you mentioned, he could take a shot. Julio Cesar Chavez kicked his azz very bad, but he didn't go down at any point.giacomino wrote: ↑17 Oct 2025, 06:50Rosario was one of the biggest hitters in lightweight and jr. welterweight history, and a good boxer when he was patient, which wasn't always the case. I thought he won the Camacho fight but Camacho clearly backed off after being hurt because he'd never been rattled like that. He probably did OK in the bank account department considering he got paid well to fight a shot Mancini, Haugen, Chavez, Trinidad and De La Hoya. All of those were money fights then and vs Chavez, Trinidad and De La Hoya, he knew going in he just wanted to last the distancegilgamesh wrote: ↑16 Oct 2025, 16:45 It's not uncommon for a guy to start to become gunshy after being knocked out, but it's a little unusual to see a guy be gunshy for the rest of his career after simply being hurt.
He was never stopped though so maybe being gunshy was ultimately the right call. For his long term health anyway, maybe not his bank account.
Has Camacho ever been knocked down?