Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160
Posted: 21 Feb 2026, 10:57
12 rounds. Who ya got?
And hit harderelmersalsa wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 17:38 It's a toss up for me. But, I am more on Roy Jones Jr side. Too fast. Too slick. Too quick.
If Sugar Ray Leonard was fast, Jones was much more faster.
Great points. I also want to add that Jones was not yet at peak at 160. His peak weights were 168 and 175.
I disagree.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 12:58and ring IQ, determination, grit, switch hitting, reach, experience, fighting at peak weight, chin, strength.
Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.Cent0089 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 16:59I disagree.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 12:58and ring IQ, determination, grit, switch hitting, reach, experience, fighting at peak weight, chin, strength.
I wrote that toughness and punch resistance was Hagler advantage. That includes chin too. Jones had advantage in every other thingskeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 17:12Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.Cent0089 wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 16:59I disagree.keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 12:58
and ring IQ, determination, grit, switch hitting, reach, experience, fighting at peak weight, chin, strength.
Are you gonna argue that Roy had more experience? That Roy was at his peak weight at 160? That Roy had a longer reach? If so, let's hear it.
You think Jones has advantage in experience? Peak weight? Reach?Cent0089 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 00:28Jones had advantage in every other thingskeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 17:12Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.
Are you gonna argue that Roy had more experience? That Roy was at his peak weight at 160? That Roy had a longer reach? If so, let's hear it.
Yes. But it is my opinion, you can disagreekeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 05:32You think Jones has advantage in experience? Peak weight? Reach?Cent0089 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 00:28Jones had advantage in every other thingskeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 17:12
Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.
Are you gonna argue that Roy had more experience? That Roy was at his peak weight at 160? That Roy had a longer reach? If so, let's hear it.
I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.
Longer reach doesnt mean a boxer is better in something or?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 08:26I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.Cent0089 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 08:16Yes. But it is my opinion, you can disagreekeithmoonhangover wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 05:32
You think Jones has advantage in experience? Peak weight? Reach?![]()
It means he has a longer reach.Cent0089 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 09:46Longer reach doesnt mean a boxer is better in something or?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 08:26I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.
keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 10:05It means he has a longer reach.Cent0089 wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 09:46Longer reach doesnt mean a boxer is better in something or?keithmoonhangover wrote: ↑23 Feb 2026, 08:26
I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.
gilgamesh wrote: ↑22 Feb 2026, 03:02And hit harderelmersalsa wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 17:38 It's a toss up for me. But, I am more on Roy Jones Jr side. Too fast. Too slick. Too quick.
If Sugar Ray Leonard was fast, Jones was much more faster.