Page 1 of 1

Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 21 Feb 2026, 10:57
by keithmoonhangover
12 rounds. Who ya got?

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 21 Feb 2026, 13:51
by Noxy
Jonesy, provided he isn’t weakened by making weight. He was just too quick.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 21 Feb 2026, 13:58
by Nile4000
Jones, and only if it's a 12 round fight.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 21 Feb 2026, 15:27
by gilgamesh
I think Roy is too fast for Marvin. It's possible Marvin wears him down, and saps his energy for a late rounds assault, but I think he's a step behind Roy all night, and loses a UD.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 21 Feb 2026, 17:38
by elmersalsa
It's a toss up for me. But, I am more on Roy Jones Jr side. Too fast. Too slick. Too quick.

If Sugar Ray Leonard was fast, Jones was much more faster.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 03:02
by gilgamesh
elmersalsa wrote: 21 Feb 2026, 17:38 It's a toss up for me. But, I am more on Roy Jones Jr side. Too fast. Too slick. Too quick.

If Sugar Ray Leonard was fast, Jones was much more faster.
And hit harder

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 05:59
by Cent0089
Jones is better in every single aspect except punch resistance and toughness. That aspect is however a big one. But Jones speed, power and size would be too much for Hagler and maybe even good enough for stopping Marvelous. Still, solid chance for Hagler to hit and hurt Jones and got a win after that.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 11:38
by goose 5
Good points raised about the length of the bout and Jones possibly being weakened by the weight. Same day weigh-in leads to a Hagler win.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 12:58
by keithmoonhangover
Cent0089 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 05:59 Jones is better in every single aspect except punch resistance and toughness.
and ring IQ, determination, grit, switch hitting, reach, experience, fighting at peak weight, chin, strength.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 13:00
by tiny_acres
goose 5 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 11:38 Good points raised about the length of the bout and Jones possibly being weakened by the weight. Same day weigh-in leads to a Hagler win.
Great points. I also want to add that Jones was not yet at peak at 160. His peak weights were 168 and 175.
I think Hagler pulls this off with the closest of margins

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 13:13
by goose 5
I'd say Hagler had a better jab than Jones.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 13:27
by tiny_acres
goose 5 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 13:13 I'd say Hagler had a better jab than Jones.
Jab, chin and endurance

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 16:59
by Cent0089
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 12:58
Cent0089 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 05:59 Jones is better in every single aspect except punch resistance and toughness.
and ring IQ, determination, grit, switch hitting, reach, experience, fighting at peak weight, chin, strength.
I disagree.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 22 Feb 2026, 17:12
by keithmoonhangover
Cent0089 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 16:59
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 12:58
Cent0089 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 05:59 Jones is better in every single aspect except punch resistance and toughness.
and ring IQ, determination, grit, switch hitting, reach, experience, fighting at peak weight, chin, strength.
I disagree.
Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.

Are you gonna argue that Roy had more experience? That Roy was at his peak weight at 160? That Roy had a longer reach? If so, let's hear it.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 23 Feb 2026, 00:28
by Cent0089
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 17:12
Cent0089 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 16:59
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 12:58

and ring IQ, determination, grit, switch hitting, reach, experience, fighting at peak weight, chin, strength.
I disagree.
Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.

Are you gonna argue that Roy had more experience? That Roy was at his peak weight at 160? That Roy had a longer reach? If so, let's hear it.
I wrote that toughness and punch resistance was Hagler advantage. That includes chin too. Jones had advantage in every other things

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 23 Feb 2026, 05:32
by keithmoonhangover
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 00:28
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 17:12
Cent0089 wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 16:59

I disagree.
Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.

Are you gonna argue that Roy had more experience? That Roy was at his peak weight at 160? That Roy had a longer reach? If so, let's hear it.
Jones had advantage in every other things
You think Jones has advantage in experience? Peak weight? Reach?

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 23 Feb 2026, 08:16
by Cent0089
keithmoonhangover wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 05:32
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 00:28
keithmoonhangover wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 17:12

Yeah, but I'm right. At 160, Hagler took clean shots by Thomas Hearns and kept on coming. That sir, is emphatic proof that Marvin's chin was solid.

Are you gonna argue that Roy had more experience? That Roy was at his peak weight at 160? That Roy had a longer reach? If so, let's hear it.
Jones had advantage in every other things
You think Jones has advantage in experience? Peak weight? Reach?
Yes. But it is my opinion, you can disagree :TU:

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 23 Feb 2026, 08:26
by keithmoonhangover
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 08:16
keithmoonhangover wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 05:32
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 00:28
Jones had advantage in every other things
You think Jones has advantage in experience? Peak weight? Reach?
Yes. But it is my opinion, you can disagree :TU:
I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 23 Feb 2026, 09:46
by Cent0089
keithmoonhangover wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 08:26
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 08:16
keithmoonhangover wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 05:32

You think Jones has advantage in experience? Peak weight? Reach?
Yes. But it is my opinion, you can disagree :TU:
I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.
Longer reach doesnt mean a boxer is better in something or?

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 23 Feb 2026, 10:05
by keithmoonhangover
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 09:46
keithmoonhangover wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 08:26
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 08:16

Yes. But it is my opinion, you can disagree :TU:
I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.
Longer reach doesnt mean a boxer is better in something or?
It means he has a longer reach.

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 23 Feb 2026, 10:18
by Cent0089
keithmoonhangover wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 10:05
Cent0089 wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 09:46
keithmoonhangover wrote: 23 Feb 2026, 08:26

I am going to disagree, because Hagler had a longer reach, that sir, is a fact.
Longer reach doesnt mean a boxer is better in something or?
It means he has a longer reach.
:TU:

Re: Marvin Hagler vs RJJ @ 160

Posted: 24 Feb 2026, 11:32
by elmersalsa
gilgamesh wrote: 22 Feb 2026, 03:02
elmersalsa wrote: 21 Feb 2026, 17:38 It's a toss up for me. But, I am more on Roy Jones Jr side. Too fast. Too slick. Too quick.

If Sugar Ray Leonard was fast, Jones was much more faster.
And hit harder
:TU: