Page 1 of 1
Barnes stripped of British title
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 08:06
by kevin
Following his defeat on Saturday David Barnes has been stripped of the British title.
More at BBN
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 08:07
by Foggy
Maybe Michael Jennings will fight for the vacant title
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 08:09
by kevin
Read the article you might be happy

Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:10
by steve689
I'm lazy and can't find the article :P Why has he been stripped of the British title after losing in a Commonwealth title challenge?
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:15
by DavidPayne
And surely, its double standards if Graham Earl was allowed to keep his belt particularly as he lost it to a British fighter.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:16
by Coconut
Not being able to defend it in a certain time because he was stopped.
How is he, anyone know?
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:20
by Slapsie Maxie
Only saw this yesterday on my return from the US.
He really did look shocking and I can only assume that something was wrong.
while I hope he is OK medically, part of me did feel a certain schadenfreude in his defeat particularly following the gift versus Vincent and the temper tantrums last time out
Was watching Million Dollar Baby on the plane on the way home and Morgan Freeman described a gym bully as having " all the skills but the heart of a split pea"
Thought of that as I watched the Barnes fight.
slapsie
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:27
by kevin
steve689 wrote:I'm lazy and can't find the article :P Why has he been stripped of the British title after losing in a Commonwealth title challenge?
Lazy git!!
He was due to fight a mandatory defence against Vincent, he is now suspended for 45 days following the stoppage. He was stripped because he is unable to make the mandatory defence.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:29
by Priff
OK, does that mean Vincent versus XX are guaranteed to fight for the vacant title?
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:30
by kevin
Yes Jennings and Vincent will now fight for the Vacant title
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:49
by Priff
I (like many many others no doubt) hope Vincent can take this chance. Hopefully he can reclaim the form from the first Barnes fight which was an exception performance for him.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:55
by Coconut
Is Barnes slotted in as first defence?
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 09:59
by Southpaw Stylist
Lol.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 10:35
by DavidPayne
How does Barnes lose his title but Earl keeps his?
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 10:43
by kevin
Earl lost on points and therefore wasn't suspended.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 11:02
by DavidPayne
mmmm.....so the stoppage defeat means he loses the title?
the fact Earl got humilated by a novice fellow Brit doesn't?
Doesn't make sense to me.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 11:22
by Priff
DavidPayne wrote:mmmm.....so the stoppage defeat means he loses the title?
the fact Earl got humilated by a novice fellow Brit doesn't?
Doesn't make sense to me.
Stoppage means he's banned from sparring dun't it. 60 days or something?
Therefore, he's Ineligable for the defense.
Not a matter of who was 'humiliated', but that he is unable to make a mandatory defence.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 11:39
by Loynesy
Slapsie - I reckon that is the first time someone has used the word "schadenfreude" on this site (unless Bubi has had a go)
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 11:43
by Slapsie Maxie
I live to inform
well knowing me, I am told, is an education because, every time I go out on a first date, the woman always leaves me saying " well that taught me a lesson"
S
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 11:46
by kevin
DavidPayne wrote:mmmm.....so the stoppage defeat means he loses the title?
the fact Earl got humilated by a novice fellow Brit doesn't?
Doesn't make sense to me.
A stoppage or KO means he is automatically for 28 days, Barnes was upped to 45 days by the ringside doctor.
Therefore he can not fulfil his mandatory with Vincent.
Here is the ruling from the BBBoC rulebook.
22.12 - A Champion shall forfeit his title in the following circumstances
(e) If a Champion is for any reason unable or unwilling to defend his title when required by the Board to do so.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 12:18
by jomothepure
This is all from the latest releases by the Commonwealth committee Kev? Did they say anything about the vacant Heavyweight title, or are they going to wait for Skelton/Williams?
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 12:21
by kevin
This is the latest release from the British Boxing Board of Control, nothing about the Heavyweight title, I thought Skelton/Williams was also for the Commonwealth title or did they not sanction it?
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 12:26
by jomothepure
Kevin wrote:This is the latest release from the British Boxing Board of Control, nothing about the Heavyweight title, I thought Skelton/Williams was also for the Commonwealth title or did they not sanction it?
It all passed me by too this one. Apparently those clever aussies stripped Skelton as soon as he fought Moli for the WBU. I saw a pool of about 9 or 10 who were in line to fight for the now vacant title ie. any two. Skelton and Williams were in there (so I don't know why they won't be fighting for it) as was Sprott.
Posted: 09 Jun 2005, 13:15
by stujones
A bit of bad luck for Vincent, Jennings is a much tougher prospect than Barnes. Always thought he was the better fighter.
I wanted to see Jennings fight for the Commonwealth belt cause that fighter is well beatable - perhaps Jennings' other stable mate Tony Doherty can go that route.