Page 1 of 1
Tyson headed for 4-rounders?
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 11:38
by Neri
Fightnews.com
Mike Tyson trainer Jeff Fenech reportedly headed to Phoenix today for negotiations involving a four-round tournament against the likes of Tyson, Evander Holyfield and Riddick Bowe. "Mike does not want to go out of boxing as a loser against Kevin McBride," Fenech said told Aussie boxing writer Grantlee Kieza. "He is one of the greatest heavyweight champions of all time and is still explosive for four rounds. He doesn't want to compete in ten-round fights because after 20 years as a big-name fighter it is hard to keep backing up in the gym."
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 11:39
by nickd
Oh dear.
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 11:47
by Coconut
This is tragic.
And he's got to work on his fitness if he's going to last four rounds.
Tyson vs Butterbean. You know it.
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 11:55
by DavidPayne
Hey a legends tournament....
Tyson, Bowe, Tubbs, McCall, Moorer, Sanders, Holyfield and Mercer.
Clay-Bey on stand-by.
What do you think?
Winner to face Butterbean?
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 12:12
by KOJOE90
And guess what?
George Forman has offered to train and manage Mike Tyson.
http://www.blackathlete.net/artman/publ ... 0830.shtml
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 12:31
by mikewl
I actually would not mind this too much, at least they would not be trying to sell the public into beleiving he was on his way to a title shot, also as long as this is not a pay to watch thing then it would definetely have me tuning in to watch.
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 12:38
by jab
A while back I made a joke saying that if Tyson keeps fighting to pay his bills and alear his debts, his next foe is likely to be Butterbean. But I intended it as a joke. Now with this 4 rder thingy, it may just become reality.
It would be pathetic if Tyson loses to Bean too. He should retire. But he just cannot do it with all those debts. Who would have thought in the 80s that Tyson will sink this low to fight in 4 rders? IF you told someone this back then you would have been certified as insane. But sometimes reality is more weird than delusions. Go figure.

:(
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 12:56
by jamesmcdonnell
Oh this is terrible, so now Mike is going to be fighting butterbean, I joked about it on maxboxing recently, and now it looks like happening.
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 13:02
by nickd
Butterbean will probably beat him.
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 13:41
by KOJOE90
jab wrote:Who would have thought in the 80s that Tyson will sink this low to fight in 4 rders? IF you told someone this back then you would have been certified as insane. But sometimes reality is more weird than delusions. Go figure.

:(
Yeah, I know exactly what you mean whilst in his hey-day of the mid eighties I always knew he would lose eventually but it is kind of strange looking at his recent fight results.
I started a relevent thread on this subject a while back.
http://www.boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=23731&
Maybe it's time to add Tyson vs McBride to my list.
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 13:43
by KOJOE90
nickd wrote:Butterbean will probably beat him.
You may well be right.
To my mind if Butterbean beat Tyson I would not consider it an upset.
Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 16:59
by jab
KOJOE,
yes, looking at your list Kevin McBride definitely deserves a spot in there. The result was ver unlikely. Williams might have deserved it too, but the Tyson foot breaking precludes it. IT was genuine injury and it did affect the result. Freak injuries dont count. But freak resulty without injury do deserve a place on your list.
As to your point that Tyson was bound to lose eventually, I guess that is normal for everyone eventually. But losing to Lewis or Holyfield is one thing, losing to McBride is another. Even the loss to Buster Douglas has some explanations. McBride doesnt. Though again, that Douglas fight is borderline. Maybe it should be in there. But at least Douglas did beat a few quality guys so it is not as clear cut.
As for Butterbean, yes, if he catches Tyson with a power punch, Mike is history. He cant take 400lb of blubber smack in his face at this age.
Tyson is just showing how mentally screwed up he is: he said he will become missionary, then good will ambassador to Africa. Now he changed his mind (only 3 weeks later) and says he will be a 4 rounder. Who knows what he decided next month??

Posted: 29 Jun 2005, 17:09
by Hesketh Vampire
jab wrote:Who knows what he decided next month??

A 2-rounder probably, with 2 minute rounds. To be honest the idea of a "legends" tournament, probably to be staged in some boxing-backwater US state, was bound to come up sooner or later now Tyson is all washed up as a "regular" boxer. There are just too many old "name" heavies lurking about who refuse to go away that with Tyson now on the market some budding entrepreneur couldn't resist. Still, might be worth watching - Tyson, Holyfield, Bowe, Mercer, Moorer, Tubbs, plus some other US heavies we'd forgotten that we'd forgotten about.
Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 04:53
by steve689
With Mayweather-Gatti and then this sort of news, only Boxing can thrill and then disgust me in the space of a week

Re: Tyson headed for 4-rounders?
Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 06:11
by BubiScholz
Neri1983 wrote:Fightnews.com
Mike Tyson trainer Jeff Fenech reportedly headed to Phoenix today for negotiations involving a four-round tournament against the likes of Tyson, Evander Holyfield and Riddick Bowe. "Mike does not want to go out of boxing as a loser against Kevin McBride," Fenech said told Aussie boxing writer Grantlee Kieza. "He is one of the greatest heavyweight champions of all time and is still explosive for four rounds. He doesn't want to compete in ten-round fights because after 20 years as a big-name fighter it is hard to keep backing up in the gym."
They should pick up Foreman, Moorer and Hide and should all box daily at the Octoberfest in Munich vs these Circusboxers.....

Re: Tyson headed for 4-rounders?
Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 06:19
by nickd
BubiScholz wrote:Neri1983 wrote:Fightnews.com
Mike Tyson trainer Jeff Fenech reportedly headed to Phoenix today for negotiations involving a four-round tournament against the likes of Tyson, Evander Holyfield and Riddick Bowe. "Mike does not want to go out of boxing as a loser against Kevin McBride," Fenech said told Aussie boxing writer Grantlee Kieza. "He is one of the greatest heavyweight champions of all time and is still explosive for four rounds. He doesn't want to compete in ten-round fights because after 20 years as a big-name fighter it is hard to keep backing up in the gym."
They should pick up Foreman, Moorer and Hide and should all box daily at the Octoberfest in Munich vs these Circusboxers.....

Hide will do it if he can wear a protective helmet.
Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 07:23
by stujones
A little harsh on Moorer, his stamina is okay.
Posted: 30 Jun 2005, 08:54
by Syntax Error
Tyson can't even manage 4 rounds these days.