Page 1 of 4
Naz, you are a porker
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 06:15
by states
In todays Sun, Confirming what we've all known for a while now: The prince is a fat git who won't be making a comeback:
Story (of sorts) here:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005390810,00.html
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 06:19
by deadpan
He makes an off-duty Hatton look skeletal.
He must look a sack of shit in the flesh. A 5 foot 3 inch lardarse.
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 07:17
by steve689
Wow Naz looks like a greasy kebab shop owener

Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 07:19
by DA_SERGEANT_WRIGHT
OH NO MY OLD HEROES FINISHED OH WELL HE MADE HIS MONEY LET HIM B HAPPY BUT HES GOT BREASTS NOW NOT A CHEST
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 07:23
by silkov
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 07:24
by silkov
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 08:09
by Syntax Error
Well he did always say that the Prince would become the King!
He's got a King's girth now!!!!!

Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 08:38
by silkov
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 08:44
by Max Molyneux
steve689 wrote:Wow Naz looks like a greasy kebab shop owener

So true.

Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 09:58
by johnswan1
That is fornicating unbelievable but also very sad. Such a waste of so much talent. Not saying I liked the guy but come on, we all used to look forward to seeing him fight.
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 10:22
by silkov
johnswan1 wrote:That is fornicating unbelievable but also very sad. Such a waste of so much talent. Not saying I liked the guy but come on, we all used to look forward to seeing him fight.
Maybe he's happy?... he's got the money, family etc... quite a few fighters pile on the pounds after they retire following years of weightmaking and watching what they eat etc. 'Pound for pound' (sorry

!) Hamed is probably in no worse shape than Hatton lets himself get into between fights, and Hatton is still active!......

.
Having said that I do think Hamed fell far short of using his talent to the full during his career and the way he just dissapeared from boxing is a shame....
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 12:04
by Old bones Ian
Bet Naz is on the running machine right now, nothing worse than seeing yourself in a photo and you realise how much weight you've put on.
I lost 2 stone after seeing myself in a photo.
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 12:33
by stujones
He looks furious in that pic.
I wouldn't say Hamed wasted his talent. I think Barrera exposed him as a good B level champion. I just think Barerra was the first A level champion at the top of his game he faced.
Hamed did very well and was promoted very well, he came at a time when the best names were fading (Johnson, Vasquez Kelly). He fought Robinson giving the champion 4 weeks notice and he never fought probably the two "in their prime" champions, Espinosa and Norwood.
Medina remains Hamed's best win by far.
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 13:00
by mrbassie
Is that even him? His eyes and nose look different, it wouldn't surprise me if that was just some bloke with the same haircut.
(just considering the source)
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 13:36
by stujones
mrbassie wrote:Is that even him? His eyes and nose look different, it wouldn't surprise me if that was just some bloke with the same haircut.
(just considering the source)
I think it his him, I can definately see it his him.
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 13:56
by Slapsie Maxie
wow
Fighter with £20,000,000 in the bank retires to enjoy the good life with wife and kids!
What a scoop. Good to see The Scum is still at the cutting edge of journalism.
Slapsie
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 17:18
by Southpaw Stylist
I don't think that's him.
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 17:25
by stujones
Southpaw Stylist wrote:I don't think that's him.
Look at his hands (fingers), those are boxers hands not keebab cook hands.
Posted: 27 Aug 2005, 22:09
by Southpaw Stylist
I don't care, I'll need more to convince me...
Posted: 28 Aug 2005, 01:26
by 6 Pack
stujones wrote:He looks furious in that pic.
I wouldn't say Hamed wasted his talent. I think Barrera exposed him as a good B level champion. I just think Barerra was the first A level champion at the top of his game he faced.
Hamed did very well and was promoted very well, he came at a time when the best names were fading (Johnson, Vasquez Kelly). He fought Robinson giving the champion 4 weeks notice and he never fought probably the two "in their prime" champions, Espinosa and Norwood.
Medina remains Hamed's best win by far.
I agree he was moved very well, and fought guys at the exact right moment. for instance, Tom "Boom Boom" Johnson was a hell of a Champion, and still champ when he fought Hamed, but he looked like he was fading, and then Hamed took him out, and then he started loosing to every one he fought!
Same with Kelley, and other Champions Naz beat. He did meet a prime Barrera though. Plenty of prime fighters out there he did not stick around to fight (morales comes to mind too)
Posted: 28 Aug 2005, 03:34
by Syntax Error
The Prince better be careful, or he will be getting a call from Audley about a fight!
Audley likes picking on small heavyweights!!!! :P

Posted: 28 Aug 2005, 05:11
by Wrists
Listen guys
In the last 20 years we have had very few boxers to shout about, Benn Eubank, Lewis, Hatton and Naz
lets remember these guys how they should be, for me Naz was a very good fighter who was unfortunately judged on biased perceptions by the british media who preferred the 'i tried my best but was not quite good enough' type of sportsman.
the guy put bums on seats turned me from a casual fight fan to a boxing nut
he provided many many thrilling moments and was the best thing to happen to british boxing for years.
People say he was over hyped, I suppose the loss to Barrera takes the gloss off but I honestly believe his resume was under rated.
Robinson
Johnson
Kelley
Vasquez
Medina
Ingle
Soto
Bungu
McCullough
all of them world class fighters and all beaten some very easily and others not so but still beaten on bad nights.
Why is a picture of a man shopping with his kids used in a way in which to run a man down.
Let him enjoy his money (he worked hard to earn it) and let the man live his life.
Thanks Naz for the memories
Wrists
PS. small part of me hopes the miracle happens he comes back and shuts a lot of people up
Calzaghe w ko 8 Lacy
Cheers
Posted: 28 Aug 2005, 06:45
by stujones
6 Pack wrote:
I agree he was moved very well, and fought guys at the exact right moment. for instance, Tom "Boom Boom" Johnson was a hell of a Champion, and still champ when he fought Hamed, but he looked like he was fading, and then Hamed took him out, and then he started loosing to every one he fought!
Same with Kelley, and other Champions Naz beat. He did meet a prime Barrera though. Plenty of prime fighters out there he did not stick around to fight (morales comes to mind too)
Yeah, I agree. These criticisms get labelled at DLH aswell although for me the critical difference between when Hamed fought Kelley/Johnson etc and DLH fought Whittikar/Chavez is that although Whittikar and Chavez were definately fading - they were still considered universally the #1 fighter in the devision. Johnson and Kelley were not.
Although, yes you have to rank Hamed as the #1 featherweight at the time (with all the decent wins he did rack up) for most publications the fighters right below him for a large period of his championship reign were Espinosa and Norwood.
I agree with Wrists we should be greatful for his achievements and yes he made me watch every SBO show (just incase he would lose I must admit), for what he did he has to be in the #10 greatest British fighters of all time and in the top #2 of the last 25 years. Having said that, part of me does feel aggreived that his bank balance is probably significantly better than better fighters such as Barrera and Morales and even less skilled but warriors like a Micky Ward.
Posted: 28 Aug 2005, 08:47
by hitman_hatton1
i watched some hamed fights earlier.
his fights with juan polo perez and wilfredo vasquez.
naz was wbo no1 for marco antonio barrera's super bantam title back around the time he fought perez.
imagine naz v barrera back in 95. what a fight that would have been.

Posted: 28 Aug 2005, 17:44
by Manos de Oro
He got out at the right time, IMO.