Page 1 of 1

Calzaghe won't go to USA because....

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 11:17
by s9s
He's scared that the decision might go against him, quote.

"While the Mancunian was outclassed, Calzaghe believes Reid got a raw deal from the judges and admits he fears a lopsided decision should he fight on Lacy's turf. "

"To be honest, looking at the judging with the Robin Reid fight I don't think I'd go to Florida, because that was disgusting the way Robin Reid got cheated," Calzaghe said.

So he's definately not going to fight Lacy, I cant see Lacy coming back over here after the postponment.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/4274462.stm

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 11:19
by Goz
I don't care!

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 11:25
by kevo
Nobody does!

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 11:50
by Manos de Oro
Calzaghecott!

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 12:20
by Kilburn
Calzaghe seemed to be referring more to the ref than the actual judges. I thought he came across pretty well in the interview last night.

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 12:33
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
The Ref was a disgrace, Lacy would have won anyway but in a tight fight a ref like that would tip the scales. I wouldnt want to fight 2men at the same time either

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 12:36
by Neri
Reid even though getting hammered, showed balls by going into Lacy's backyard. It's something Calzaghe will never have, if Calzaghe is really No. 1 Super middle then shouldnt he turn round and say 'ok ill come over, it doesnt matter, im a true champion and will knock you out regardless of the venue' ?. Look for Hatton to fight in the US next year, look for Calzaghe to stay at home.

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 12:45
by KOJOE90
A Calzaghe quote from the BBC.
"This is the first time a champion has put his title on the line, but I've got injured," Calzaghe told BBC Sport.

"But I will fight Jeff Lacy, regardless of money, regardless of anything else, it's a fight I definitely want."
However I still doubt the Lacy fight will ever happen.

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 12:52
by Old bones Ian
KOJOE90 wrote:A Calzaghe quote from the BBC.
"This is the first time a champion has put his title on the line, but I've got injured," Calzaghe told BBC Sport.

"But I will fight Jeff Lacy, regardless of money, regardless of anything else, it's a fight I definitely want."
However I still doubt the Lacy fight will ever happen.
I'm not to sure it won't, even Calzaghe's biggest fans must know that he can't call himself No1 in the division without fighting Lacy.
Every interview he has the only thing he gets asked is when is the fight happening, so i feel even Joe will want to get this fight on.

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 13:14
by mrbassie
Phenomenal-Nutrition wrote:The Ref was a disgrace, Lacy would have won anyway but in a tight fight a ref like that would tip the scales. I wouldnt want to fight 2men at the same time either
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Of course that kind of refereeing never happens here and certainly not at the MEN, no, never!

Posted: 23 Sep 2005, 18:59
by Max Molyneux
Calzaghe seems to be honest in some interviews but dodgey decisions happen everwhere. Maybethe knockdowns and other things might of not have happened if the ref wasn't Lacy biased.

Perhaps they wanted to ensure Reid got stopped instead of it going to a Lacy decision, so they could intimidate Joe and take advantage of the fact that Joe has injuries everytime he gets offered a good fight and play off that since people distrust Joe now maybe so they could gain more fans?

Posted: 24 Sep 2005, 09:52
by kevo
Max Molyneux wrote: Maybethe knockdowns and other things might of not have happened if the ref wasn't Lacy biased.
:o

And maybe Reid would have won if Lacy didn,t keep punching him in the face :wink:

Re: Calzaghe won't go to USA because....

Posted: 24 Sep 2005, 10:45
by steve689
s9s wrote:Calzaghe believes Reid got a raw deal from the judges and admits he fears a lopsided decision should he fight on Lacy's turf. "
I don't understand this statement :o But as for the rest, well....yawn :oops:

Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 07:11
by J
Kevo wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote: Maybethe knockdowns and other things might of not have happened if the ref wasn't Lacy biased.
:o

And maybe Reid would have won if Lacy didn,t keep punching him in the face :wink:
it made no differnce in the long run but Reid was smacked on the break for the first KD.

I dont think anyone was saying that in the Zoo fight Ricky duid not have the best of the reffing decisions, this point is being brought up in refute of the fact that it doesnt just happen here.

If you listen to the yanks about hatton you would think that the MEN is the only place you get hometown reffing. Which is bullshit.

Lennox v Tyson another example of the crap reffing that can occur both stateside and here.

I actually didnt think Dave parris was that bad at the MEN, but then again i would say that, but most folk seem to forget Kostya was dishing out more than his fair share of low blows, shoulder charges etc AND by the way Cotto threw more low blows at the weeknd than ive seen in the whole of hattons career.

one in particular really hurt Torres and he got away with it.

Cotto was a very lucky man at the weekend and is beggining to get found out if you make him work outside his own pace.

Hatton and mayweather eat cotto alive based on his recent perfomances.

So much for his fantastic defence huh :roll:
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 07:46
by Max Molyneux
Kevo wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote: Maybethe knockdowns and other things might of not have happened if the ref wasn't Lacy biased.
:o

And maybe Reid would have won if Lacy didn,t keep punching him in the face :wink:
True but it might of been more likely a decision or a later stoppage.

Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 08:12
by Coconut
Max Molyneux wrote:
Kevo wrote:
Max Molyneux wrote: Maybethe knockdowns and other things might of not have happened if the ref wasn't Lacy biased.
:o

And maybe Reid would have won if Lacy didn,t keep punching him in the face :wink:
True but it might of been more likely a decision or a later stoppage.
The thing with Reid, who has / had a solid chin, was to make the first real dent. After that, he's more susceptible.



J, I'm with you on Parris. I think he did a decent job in that he was reasonable to both sides in a hard bout to ref.



But yes, fans disagree with refs all over the world and the US is far from immune to horrible reffing. It'd just be nice if they realised that...

Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 08:15
by Max Molyneux
Dave Parris was a good ref. :TU:
The thing with Reid, who has / had a solid chin, was to make the first real dent. After that, he's more susceptible
Just because of one fight?

Posted: 26 Sep 2005, 09:57
by Coconut
Max Molyneux wrote:Dave Parris was a good ref. :TU:
The thing with Reid, who has / had a solid chin, was to make the first real dent. After that, he's more susceptible
Just because of one fight?
No, sorry, should've maybe been clearer.


Reid's got a good chin in general play but if you get a free shot on it then he's not going to be 'right' immediately afterwards and will therefore be more susceptible in the remainder of the fight.