Page 1 of 1

Warren decides against injunction

Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 13:42
by kevin

Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 14:17
by states
Hmm, not sure I can agree with Ricky that he was being put in with dangerous fighters all the time, and that Frank didn't care about his best interests. Still, this does suggest that Frank might be accepting that it's over, as long as he gets compensated.

Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 14:36
by nickd
Ricky continues in his statement by saying that "allegedly would put me into whatever fights as made the most money for them as quickly as possible. They would put me into three successive brutal defences against the best fighters in the world regardless of the fact that that would not be appropriate course for me, my health or career".
Three successive brutal defences? Hatton has had 1 brutal fight against Tszyu and plenty of easy nights. Making a statement like that is just plain ridiculous.

Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 16:26
by Max Molyneux
Hatton might be going the way Naz and Coneteh did. :roll:

Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 18:38
by stujones
So that press release in English please?

Does this mean that Hatton vs Maussa will definately go ahead as planned?

Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 19:09
by kevin
I believe he won't try and stop the fight happening but will still claim compensation etc from Hatton for breach of contract

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 08:05
by MightyWarrior
Humble pie at SN head office by the sounds of it!

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 09:50
by THEBUTCH
Hatton's gone (for now) and Warren had better get used it.

He's lost, so now he can start hatching more little schemes to get back at Ricky in the adult manner we've come to expect from him.

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 09:55
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
nickd wrote:
Ricky continues in his statement by saying that "allegedly allegedly would put me into whatever fights as made the most money for them as quickly as possible. They would put me into three successive brutal defences against the best fighters in the world regardless of the fact that that would not be appropriate course for me, my health or career".
Three successive brutal defences? Hatton has had 1 brutal fight against Tszyu and plenty of easy nights. Making a statement like that is just plain ridiculous.
Does that mean hes going to step away from the top P4P Comp of brutes like Vilches and Pederson and step down the comp :lol: CHEEKY B******

Also don't miss Billy telling us like it is:

"Ricky's trainer Billy Graham stated recently on Sky Sports Ringside programme: "do I fancy him [Maussa] for Ricky? I don't think anybody would really pay to see it." :lol:

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 09:55
by BunglesFingers
I see that FW also had a pop at Fight Academy for not being licenced promoters :roll:

http://www.secondsout.com/UK/news.cfm?ccs=228&cs=17656

Posted: 17 Oct 2005, 09:55
by Phenomenal-Nutrition
stujones wrote:So that press release in English please?

Does this mean that Hatton vs Maussa will definately go ahead as planned?
No its too much of a 'BRUTAL DEFENSE'