Page 1 of 1

Michael Nunn vs Terry Norris

Posted: 16 Nov 2005, 16:27
by cybox
Would Terry's pressing and power be too much for a slick Nunn or would he be able to elude Terrible Terry and win a decision much like he did in the Barkley fight?

Posted: 16 Nov 2005, 16:39
by Autobarn
After being stopped by ex welter Simon Brown, I think Norris knew he was no middle. Even though he beat some future middle champs (Quincy taylor, Steve Little, Jorge Castro). Nunn was a massive middle.

Interesting that Nunn was supposed to have got lucky vs Marlon Starling, but I don't think Norris could've withstood going in with the far bigger (6'3 or 6'4) man

Posted: 16 Nov 2005, 17:02
by cybox
I've stood next to Michael and he is maybe 6'1"

Posted: 17 Nov 2005, 03:54
by Autobarn
i remember nunn towered over toney (5'9). there wasn't much difference in size between he and barkley who is listed as 6' 1, however

Posted: 17 Nov 2005, 08:36
by KO Artist
Nunn was a 6'2" middleweight who imo was one of the most complete fighters of modern times.

He moved up to 168 and was still world class.

Norris was a 5'9" light middle who weighed as little as 150lbs.

Nun stopped granite chinned middles, Curtis Parker and Sumbu Kalambay, and also stopped Crawford Ashely with body shots.

Nunn - Norris is a mismatch, with Nunn winning inside 4 rounds.

Posted: 22 Nov 2005, 03:45
by hawaiianpunch
KO Atrist wrote:
Nunn - Norris is a mismatch, with Nunn winning inside 4 rounds.
I agree, but I'd be routing for Norris all the way!