Page 1 of 1
Ray Joval beats Shannon Taylor
Posted: 27 Nov 2005, 11:32
by Zhuge
fightnews.com wrote:
Dutchman Raymond Joval (35-4) retained the IBO middleweight title when he stopped Shannan Taylor (42-4-2) in round ten at the Vodafone Arena, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia on Sunday. Taylor scored with solid body shots in round one and two that visibly hurt the champion but it was the busier work rate of Joval that had him in ahead on the scorecards when American referee Pat Russell saved the game challenger from further punishment at 2 minutes of round ten.
I'm somewhat surprised by that -- given the way Joval was soundly whipped by Soliman, I figured he was pretty much done.
Re: Ray Joval beats Shannon Taylor
Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 06:09
by knockout
Zhuge wrote:fightnews.com wrote:
Dutchman Raymond Joval (35-4) retained the IBO middleweight title when he stopped Shannan Taylor (42-4-2) in round ten at the Vodafone Arena, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia on Sunday. Taylor scored with solid body shots in round one and two that visibly hurt the champion but it was the busier work rate of Joval that had him in ahead on the scorecards when American referee Pat Russell saved the game challenger from further punishment at 2 minutes of round ten.
I'm somewhat surprised by that -- given the way Joval was soundly whipped by Soliman, I figured he was pretty much done.
Sam is one of the best middleweights in the world though where as Shannon never was a middleweight and was never as good pound for pound either.. I am happy for Ray, he is a really nice guy...Shame him and Sam had to fight TWICE.. they are good friends from when they used to be down at the Peacock together
Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 06:36
by Cuban Lion
If Sam Soliman is one of the best middleweights in the world the division is poorer than the heavyweights.
Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 06:37
by knockout
Cuban Lion wrote:If Sam Soliman is one of the best middleweights in the world the division is poorer than the heavyweights.
Then the middleweight division must be poorer than the heavyweight division then
Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 06:41
by Cuban Lion
Yes it is poorer than the heavys.
Posted: 28 Nov 2005, 06:49
by knockout
Cuban Lion wrote:Yes it is poorer than the heavys.
i dont know how you work that out...
In the middleweight division you have two future hall of famers in Hopkins and Wright, who can still deliver the goods (ie not shot and hanging around for a payday like they do in the heavyweights)
You have 4 undefeated fighters in Ikeke, Abrahams, Sturm and Taylor who all show great potential...
You have Sam who hasn't lost a fight in nearly 5 years...
I would say the middleweight division is pretty damn good